Discussion Locked

High Level format Vs. Low Level format

0 helpful
1 reply
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Hi! everyone. Kindly tell me :
1) What is preferrable, a low level format , or a high level format....
2) How does a high level format(HLF) effect the overall performance of the HDD (if it does).
3) Does it reduce the reliability of the media if frequent HLFs are done?
4) Is it preferred to delete file rather than using Fdisk?

1 reply

by shanghai sam

1) It is preferrable not to have to format.
If u have to wipe your hard drive, a high-
level format is usually done. For example,
FORMAT /q C:. This option of format will
quickly format your hard drive. I think
this option just deletes files listed in
the FAT (it doesn't really format your HD)
The option FORMAT C: (the default) will
format your HD by writing 0's to it which
physically overwrites everything on the
HD except the MBR.
The option FORMAT /u C: will format your
HD (writing 0's) and also kills the MBR.

2) The format does not effect the perform-
ance of the hard drive.

3) No, I don't think so. The only thing I
can think of is the magnetic areas
physically on the HD. If any of those
areas degrade, then u start getting bad
clusters. The degrading usually happens
over time. This is normal.

4) The first thing u have to know is what
FDISK is. It stands for FIXED DISK. This
utility is used to create a single or
multiple partitions of any size on your
HD. U can use this utility to wipe your
HD, but once u delete a partition and
re-create it, u must do a HLF anyway
which will write over all of your HD's
data. So, I would say it is wiser to
just delete the unwanted file instead of
using FDISK.

This discussion is closed to new replies.