Community archive

Ask something
Discussion Locked

If you have a moment...

0 helpful
1 reply

by mickster269

Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Can you visit this thread, and give comments?

http://tinyurl.com/bldht

While Jaqui and Rob have replied (and quite nicely, I might add), I was hoping for some more opinions.

(Yeah, I probably shoulda posted it here, but I decided to post it in the proper area first.)

Thanks!

1 reply

by sleepin'dawg

Patent/copyright lawyers and would depend a lot upon just what was included in the sale agreement, which would have probably been drawn up by lawyers. Once that situation is clarified to everyone's satisfaction then the patent/copyright laws will not be aplicable because ownership of the material would have been established in the sale agreement, which BTW should have a non-compete clause in it. I would think that as long as the code wasn't the same there shouldn't be too big of a problem settling this but you have to accept that lawyers are going to be involved.

[b]Dawg[/b] ]:)

This discussion is closed to new replies.