Discussion Locked

Let's talk metaphysics ...

0 helpful
71 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

I have noticed that discussions in the religion/philosophy area attract a lot of interest, whilst not rapidly degrading to the name-calling that seems inevitable in political discussions.

So I will start the ball rolling: As I am totally incapable of comprehending endless space and limitless time, and thus am unable to grasp the fundamental parameters in which I live, I take it for granted that the human mind is not capable of understanding the great cosmic mysteries.

I also assume that as humans we look at the universe from our perspective which, to us, is the middle. So on the one hand we are in awe at the immense size of the universe -- which aparently is rapidly increasing -- while on the other hand we discover smaller and smaller units of matter/energy, up to (or should that be down to) the point that we find particles which do not behave as might have been expected.

So where does homo sapiens (whoever thought up that description of we muddle-headed humans) fit into the big picture? I am not the least bit interested in the creationist versus evolutionist debate, as neither argument is provable.

HOWEVER, I do see our role as the hands and feet of God -- a term which turns some people off, but which I use merely for convenience to describe whatever intelligence caused the universe and ourselves to come into being. As I obviously didn't created my very complex self, then I take it for granted that an intelligence far above mine is responsible for my existence.

Because all organic creatures and plants etc are inextricably interwoven within themselves, then if they do evolve, it has to be a slow process. However as we are able to invent and create items which are assembled from detached pieces, we can greatly exceed our natural limitations. We can travel great distances in trains, ships and planes, and even travel to other planets. We can defy our natural limitation as creatures of the solid land, by travelling underwater in scuba gear or submarines. With the Internet, we can now in an instant access all human knowledge that has been gathered over centuries and millennia.

So, any thoughts please?

71 replies

by oz_media

Interesting views Jules! It is very perplexing to even start to visualize the size of the universe, our brains however programmed are not capable of thinking in such immense proportions, yet. Who knows what lies around the corner for mankind (I don't really dig the Homo-sapien references either)as we discover new ways of exploration and visualizing the universe, we may in time actually be able to conceive much greater things than we do today.

My cat disappeared on Thursday and hasn't shown himself since. I can attribute this to being hit by a car, being catnapped or even the coyotes catching him. I have also considered that he may have gone walkabout. My cat has spent most of his eight years in the same neighbourhood, moving to the island and having a forest behind my house has opened up a new world to him that until lately he was unable to conceive. Perhaps he, as humans do also, has found that his world is much bigger than anticipated and has gone to explore these new areas. When living in Vancouver, his world consisted of a few blocks where he prowled, now it could be many acres.

I guess what I'm getting at is that not unlike my cat, we are only able to conceive what we have already discovered, another reason I don't follow religion too 'religiously', there are too many unanswered questions. Once we are able to venture further into space and perhaps unite with another 'intelligent' life form, we will be able to get a better idea of the big picture.

Man thought the world was flat at one time, this was all they could comprehend because they had never circumnavigated the earth. Now it's an expensive holiday most of us can't afford, but we still know and believe that the world is round.

This therefore opens up the concept that the universe may be smaller than we anticipate, then again it may be much larger. We haven't even begun to explore the depths of our own oceans other than a few deep sea submersibles and a few photos. Yet there is an immense ocean of discovery on our own planet where new life forms are discovered all the time. Space? We have a lot to learn still and probably still will in another few thousand years.

Side note: I was watching some old footage of medieval times and the knights and battles that took place. These GIANT warriors were generally under five feet tall, fully grown men. My son is taller than me at 18, as are most of his friends (6'+). Kids today are taller than kids were 30 years ago. Does this mean perhaps we will eventually grow to the proportions of dinosaurs? Will dogs and cats become massive again? Will dinosaurs walk the earth once again, perhaps starting a new form of evolution as humans grow wings to suit a new habitat?

by john_wills

People knew the world was round like a ball a very long time before they circumnavigated it, which was not till the 16th Century. Dante in the 14th Century assumes a globular world, as taught by Aristotle in the 3rd Century BC, and Aristotle was collating the work of earlier people. We know the world is round because we see ships disappearing over the horizon, because we see the sun moving from east to west and between the tropics - the last was the method by which the size of the earth was first more or less accurately computed, I think by Eratosthenes.

by oz_media

Even though the world was SAID to be round people still had doubts until it was seen first hand. Similar to speculating the size of space, it is completely futile until it is proven.

by john_wills

We have a problem with the very word "metaphysics": what does it mean? One book of Aristotle's encyclopaedia got the originally unofficial name "meta ta physika", i.e. "after the science", because it came after the book on natural science. The name was not completely crazy, because the book does indeed deal with things behind or beyond natural science. The intellectual discipline of metaphysics within philosophy analyzes the concepts we more or less assume in natural science, whereas logic analyzes how we manipulate concepts. In the natural sciences we consider many kinds of being or thing; in metaphysics we try to understand being or things in general.
In the 17th Century a set of poets wrote poetry now called "metaphysical"; among them were Marvell, Vaughn, Crasher; perhaps they were trying to say what the philosophers had not managed to say in prose, but I think the coincidence of names is more like plain concidence.
In the early 20th Century some philosophers started talking a lot of rubbish, even nonsense, and called it metaphysics to muddy the waters. And late in the same century a lot of quasimystical stuff got written by half-comprehending students of "oriental" thought, and this too somehow got classed as "metaphysics", regardless of the relevance to the original meaning.

by oz_media

"In the early 20th Century some philosophers started talking a lot of rubbish, even nonsense, and called it metaphysics to muddy the waters. And late in the same century a lot of quasimystical stuff got written by half-comprehending students of "oriental" thought, and this too somehow got classed as "metaphysics", regardless of the relevance to the original meaning"

I guess my posts are metaphysical.

by jardinier

You have overlooked William Blake and many other famous poets in your selection of "metaphysical poets." I am fully aware of the origin of the term, and the current definition in my largest dictionary is:

1. the branch of philosophy that deals with first principles, esp. of being and knowing.
2. the philosophical study of the nature of reality, concerned with such questions as the existence of God, the external world etc.

And a related term, "descriptive metaphysics" is defined as follows:
the philosophical study of the structure of how we think about the world.

So will you please stop talking rubbish and either get back on the train, or get off it altogether.

If you would study eastern philosophy seriously, you would find that there already existed a profound interpretation of metaphysics before the Good Lord Jesus came to save the sinners of the world. Whilst you have not made reference to the Bible, I will do so. It contains absolutely no insight into the realm of metaphysics, except Genesis 1: 1 - 7 which is quite likely a scientifically accurate description of the origin of our planet. But from that point on, and especially Genesis 1: 14 - 18, the writer of this masterpiece of absurdity continues on to say that the stars were created AFTER the earth.

Now Hegel set out a fairly comprehensive overall approach to metaphysics, but after the Theosophical Society was founded in 1875, an extremely comprehensive insight into metaphysics was developed, derived largely from an ancient Tibetan text called "The book of Dzyan." This book describes in allegorical form a detailed account of how the universe came into being.

As I sit at my computer right now, facing me on the wall is a painting -- one of a complete set of 76 -- which illustrate (in pictorial form of course) the Stanzas of Dzyan. I have the good fortune of being a close friend of the artist who painted this collection, which is why I was given one of the paintings in the series, each of which would have had a retail price tag of $AU 1,500.

So there is a vast amount of very serious material on metaphysics available, so I suggest you go back to "philosophical kindergarten" before you continue sprouting your nonsense.

by oz_media

What he said!

And I take it back, my posts are not metaphysical!
pllllllllllllllllll! :-p

by tomsal

Short and sweet...

"An underlying philosophical or theoretical principle: a belief in luck, the metaphysic of the gambler."

Hey I'm a simple guy...lol

by john_wills

The Buddha somewhere said "A woman is a bag of filth which leaks out through nine holes.". I do not generally approve of such a way of thinking about a person, but it may be an appropriate exercise for people with certain persistent inclinations. Master Hua, founder of the Chan Buddhist Gold Mountain Monastery in SF, once said "If there were two such things as sex, no-one could be saved.". I refuse to consider sexuality as evil, but one can see the Master's point. These are considerations of self-control and orientation rather than of metaphysics, but I think they have some relevance in the present discussion.

by oz_media

I was watching my favorite "Monty Pythons and the quest for the Holy Grail" the other night. It was said that the earth was banana shaped!
Now you say it's flat ! Makes sense though, the Grail was filmed in Scotland!

Did you now sheeps bladders can be deployed to prevent earthquakes?

by jardinier

For many years I enjoyed lengthy discussions about all things religions and philophical with a good friend (Tony) who was fully versed in Western Philosophy, and earned his PhD with a treatise on Kierkegaard (who is generally accredited as being the founder of existentialism). But his preferred specialty was Aristotelian logic.

Being the only offspring of Italian parents, his father -- a house-painter -- insisted that the earth was flat, and continually beseeched his son to get "a real job."

But the story continues. Being unable to get a tenured position in Western Philosphy, he joined the department of religious studies at a Catholic Girls' high school. He introduced his students to logic, and they were so interested that he created a course in logic, and had to write his own textbooks (written to publishable stage on a 286 running Word Perfect in DOS) because none were available.

Well other schools likes the idea, and so he developed an unplanned sideline in publishing his books. There were four, covering four levels of high school.

But the story does not end here. The school at which he taught introduced a course in camparative religions, and each of the teachers in the religious studies department took turns in teaching Christianity as compared with other major religions. Well when it was Tony's turn to teach Hinduism, he became so engrosed in this religion that he asked if I might consider selling him my prized bronze statue of The Dancing Shiva.

by oz_media

Now someone's got the right idea!

"at a Catholic Girls' high school. He introduced his students to logic,..." What a great idea!

'Now I know you're having these sinful feelings since turning 17 and that is quite normal, yet there is only one LOGICAL resolution...'

It's fit for Penthouse Forum!

by jardinier

Well I have learnt something about you: you are 110 per cent heterosexual, and only like natural pussy and not surgical pussy.

However I am surprised that you responded as you did: I really thought you were shock-proof.

So in some future discussion, I hereby challenge you to test my shockability (to my surprise, that is actually a real word listed in the dictionary).

by jardinier

Actually Oz, you remind me of the occasion when I was chastised by a girlfiend for using the words "Intelligent" and "Catholic" in the same sentence.

But seriously, my friend Tony was as surprised as anyone to discover the girls' interest in being taught the formal theory of logic. They apparently tuned into it very readily.

However my friend, being married and a stalwart Catholic did not take advantage of the situation in which he taught. Which reminds me:
The longest lasting live-in relationship of my life (2 years -- I'm bloody difficult to get on with) was with a high school student 20 years my junior. She attended East Hills High, and it was standard practice for the girls to drastically shorten their tunics, so that the poor male teachers had to face a roomful of knickered pussy all day. I daresay they (the teachers) frequently turned to face the blackboard, with an up-and-down motion being observed in their right arms.

Now a true story. When working on the Daily Mirror, one of the copy-takers (girls who type down stories phoned in by journalists) used to sit in a short skirt facing the News Editor. Eventually he could no longer cope with the overstimulation of his hormones, and asked the girl to dress more appropriately.

You and I have at least two things in common: we both love pussy and stirring. If I pay, will you undergo the appropriate operation so that we can REALLY cum together?

by mrbill-

How much time have you got to think? Or how much thought can you give to time?

Assume good old Sol is 4 B years old, and an avarage man lives 72 years. Now say Sol?s span has been man?s, 72 years. Man has only lived one half second of Sol?s life so far. In the time it took to realize I misspelled average you would have been born, married, honeymooned in Las Vegas, gotten that great job, had kids, grandkids, completed your PHD, wrote your best selling autobiography and died. If we assume the universe is 12-15 B years old the US has only been here a half second. Christ died less then 10 seconds ago. Man has only recorded less then the last minute of time.

by pkchukiss

There is so much unknown about this universe, what if one day, we are able to transverse Time as we have done in the 3 dimensions. Then what is the concept of "Past", or "Future", but a linear indicator of direction like "Forward" and "Reverse".

And what after Time? Is there a 5th dimension, and what is it? Is it even something quantifiable in our terms, or does it depend on us travelling in the 4th dimension?

by oz_media

I stopped taking acid when I was a teenager, I'm starting to regret it now.
Not to actually condone drugs but the majority of the most creative minds and geniuses in the world have been on LSD, Opium, Heroin etc. If it wasn't so destructive and people didn't abuse such substances, Tim Leary may have been right in condoning the scientific and military strengths of a good hallucinogen.

by jardinier

During the billionth of a nanosecond which it took me to think out, check the spelling and place the post, TechRepublic had ceased to exist.

by oz_media

The whole operation and coming togethre crap gives me the willies! Tha's not even the remotest bit funny! I see the dead end humor though and I like it! Dry, sarcastic, cutting wit makes the world go 'round.

by oz_media

If you paid, I'd move back to England and think a little more about it (it would never happen but the free flight home would be appreciated).

by oz_media

I just want to keep on posting, ya know!

Actually, sorry but I forgot you're in Australia not England, right? Australia's really fun too (probably my second fav. place)talk about cool women and great fun!

Perhapse I could meet som erandy Sheila and get her to fly me to England. It's not so bad when only there for a few weeks but the permanent move is REALLY expensive!

by jardinier

This is a pretty ancient form of yoga developed within Hinduism. It uses the natural bodily appetites, including (but not exlusively) the sexual urge.

How it works is that a couple bring themselves to the point of orgasm, but instead of ejaculating (with the man) and releasing fluids (with the woman) through concentration the energy aroused is sent up the spinal channel to the Crown Chakra, which is the direct contact point for humans with the universal consciousness.

That funny headgear which you will see on most images of the Buddha actually represents the Crown Chakra, or "many petalled lotus," signifying that the Buddha has achieved enlightenment and is in direct contact with the universal consciousness. The Holy Spirit would probably be the nearest analogy in Christianity.

Actually I suspect that the primary aim of encouraging chastity in Christianity is to contain this energy (Kundalini) so that it will lead to spiritual growth rather than be uselessly dissipated through orgasm.

Unfortunately in the Western world, the New Age movement has corrupted and degraded the true purpose of Tantric Yoga, and instead use it to produced heightened sexual experiences.

I am sure you know that in the Vatican there is a vast library of knowledge which is not available to the general public. In fact a Theosophical friend of mine (the woman who did the paintings) when accessing the Vatican library online, was blocked when she came to a certain area. Yes the Vatican has always had knowledge of these other teachings, but has chosen to keep them carefully guarded from the faithful brethren.

I have read also that Adolf Hitler engaged the services of some Tibetan Lamas in the hope of using this powerful subconscious energy to increase his own power over people. Hitler also believed in astrology, by the way, and used this to some unknown extent to decide on his military tactics.

by john_wills

Presumably whatever books the Vatican Library does not keep on its open shelves are available in other libraries, or even, if we know the titles, from www.alibris.com. May we know the url of the page your theosophical friend had trouble on, and the input she made to get the rejection?

Chastity is incumbent on all; it is part of being truly human. Celibacy is a different matter, but I do not think we have to go into kundalini theory to explain it in monasticism. A monk uproots himself from the world and hollows himself out so that God can play a tune on him as a man does on a hollowed-out reed. The dedication involved precludes the rival dedication involved in marriage. There are, of course, quasimonastic lifestyles allowing marriage, e.g. www.starcross.org, but they are usually under visitation (i.e. inspection) of celibate houses. Whether clergy should be celibate is a distinct if related question.

by jardinier

I am fully aware of the reasoning behind celibacy for the priesthood. Marriage commitments would be in competition with the priest's primary purpose of personal spiritual growth.

I suspect you have not studied Hinduism, or you would not so summarily dismiss my references to it. In Hinduism, you would find a much more enlightened teaching regarding in what circumstances celibacy is appropriate. There does not NEED to be a conflict between the deeper teachings of the various religions. Each has an exoteric and esoteric branch. [See Matt 13:10,11]. As for celibacy of the priesthood, this is surely answered clearly enough in Matt 19:12 -- it is the preferred state, but only for those who feel this particular calling.

As to availability of knowledge, yes of course other teachings are available elsewhere, and a thousand-fold more so since the development of the Internet. As for the particular area which my friend was trying to access, alas I cannot tell you. She is suffering crippling arthritis and probably wouldn't remember. However I will email her and see if she is able recall.

What you are of course revealing, John, is your total commitment to the idea that the Roman Catholic Church provides all the answers one might ever need in regard to spiritual growth.

However it is obvious from the many other postings, that we are constructively and intelligently exploring the bigger picture, rather than focusing on the teachings of a particular branch of a particular religion.

Nevertheless your contributions are appreciated, as all viewpoints together make up the tapestry of human understanding.

by maxwell edison

If the universe is "everything", like I learned in school (a long long time ago in a galaxy far far away), and if the universe is expanding, as Carl Sagen (and others) have suggested, into what is it expanding? Is it expanding into "nothing"? But If the universe is something other than "everything", what is the space in which it resides called? And how far does that space go until it stops? Or is it expanding too? And into what? And on it goes....

I liked the scene at the very end of the movie, "Men in Black" (the first one, I think), where the camera scene zooms up above the buildings, continues up above New York city, above the United States, and it keeps going up and up and up until the earth gets smaller and smaller, up until it becomes only a speck that disappears; but the zoom keeps going and going zooming past the planets and the stars, and continues up, right out of the solar system, out of the galaxy, and out of "the universe" to finally show only a small marble that was tossed by a young boy playing on the sidewalk.

by jardinier

I perceive that you are expressing in different terms the basic premise stated in my initial post: the human mind just does not have the capacity to comprehend the basic paramenters of infinity and eternity in which we live.

The good news is that if there is one thing that sets humanity above animals it is the insatiable quest for knowledge and understanding of the universe in which we live. In this discussion the question of "intelligence" in relation to humans has been raised. But the innate urge to discover, learn and understand cannot be denied.

The reason I like science fiction so much is that it explores all the possibilities which we may one day encounter but which are currently unknown to us.

Colin Luck has read and watched so much science fiction that I am quite surprised that he hasn't yet made the transition to a cyborg. In Australia, and I daresay elsewhere, they are reshowing the Dr Who series. What I used to like about that program was that, whenever I thought my imagination had been stretched to its ultimate boundaries, the Dr Who series would come up with yet another mind-blowing concept.

Yes, yes: Many questions, but few answers.

by onbliss

Yup, I used to ponder about those. Is Universe an object? Like the objects needs place holders to hold it, does the Universe needs a place holder too? If yes does that place holder need its own place holder? If yes, where do we stop?

And how come all these stuff exist? Who or how did they get created?

by oz_media

I live my life based on other people's shock value, I love it and can hit it almost every time.
Unfortunately, such comments and suggestions are not suitable for this public forum (even coming from me)so it will be hard to hit you for shock value. Two beers and I could make you throw up and turn red in the face though, that's my fav!

by onbliss

Have you read any commentaries written by Sankaracharya. He was a Hindu philosopher. Pretty good commentaries from him on metaphysics, Atma (soul) and the being.

happy reading...

by cactus pete

Before technology gets used, there has to be a need for it. Necessity being the mother of invention, and all. [You might argue that curiosity can be as well, but then we just get into another discussion about it being 'necessary' to fulfill your curiosity...]

Anyway, we have developed many technologies to help us with our contemplations of the size of the universe. Additionally, the flipside is just as relevant - Is it at all worthwhile to bother attempting to use all of this technology we have developed to measure something which, by definition, is immeasurable?

I certainly hope this has neatened up the issue for you.

by jardinier

While certain common items have been invented to serve a particular purpose, others have been inadvertant by-products of pure research.

The most outstanding example would be the development of a weapon of terrifying power, as an unplanned result of pure research by Albert Einstein. If there hadn't been a race to develop this technology before the Germans did, it may never have been developed.

The space race has produced technology applicable to many consumer items.

Many of the items we take for granted are not essential. Most of the great music, art, and philosophy were created without the benefit of electricity, telephones, motor vehicles, computers and so forth.

Incidentally the topic of this discussion is Metaphysics and not Astrophysics. We are not trying to measure anything, but rather exchange views on the as yet unsoved mysteries of the universe in which we live.

You start off by saying : "Before technology gets used, there has to be a need for it." But can't you see the contradiction in your argument? This technology that is eventually put to practical use, was developed from pure research, or shall I say the obvious -- man's unquenchable thirst for knowledge and understanding.

If this innate curiosity did not exist, then there would be no pure research, and no corresponding technology developed.

If necessity is the mother of invention, then "How, When, Where, Why" are the parents of pure research which ultimately may be developed into some technology with a practical application.

by thevirtualone

"Metaphysics is the philosophy of that which is beyond thought. In this case philosophy stands for thinking, contemplating and intuiting the essence of reality."

Morpheus: The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window. Or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work. When you go to Church. When you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.

by jardinier

Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.

The idea that what we perceive as the tangible world is only an illusion of the mind, crops up in many schools of philosophy.

The premise upon which most forms of yoga and other paths to "enlightment" are based is the ancient Eastern saying:

"The mind is the slayer of the real: slay the slayer."

by evilspamman

Since we're all being deep, I want to user some big words, too. A popular theory is that the universe is expanding. However, if the universe is endless in size, then what is it expanding into? Is there another universe (which would have to be called a multiverse, lest its name contradict its nature) that is contracting in size? And what is in the empty space that our "universe" is expanding into? Whoooooooaaaahhhhh, Duuuude

by evilspamman

"I want to user some big words." There goes all hopes of sounding intelligent. I've been typing documentation about 'users' all day and now it's a reflex.

This water cooler rules.

by jardinier

I am utterly SHOCKED to learn that you gain satisfaction from engaging in this devilish sport.

P.S. I hope you haven't shocked anyone to death.

by pgm554

There are 2 rules to life:

1.Life sucks, then you die.
2.When in doubt,refer to rule #1.

And the answer to life , the Universe and everthing is 42.

by oz_media

It kinda gives you that warm fuzzy feeling to think that there is no point in living doesn't it?

Talk about a positive outlook, that attitude is gonnna get you places.

Actually it OTHER people having that attitude that gets ME places.

by jardinier

while having an element of truth, is grieviously biased towards the negative. However it reminds me of another rather cute set of rules I encountered in a communal living setting:

Rule No 1: The captain is always right.
Rule No 2: In the event that the captain is wrong, refer to rule No 1.

But I don't think anyone can dispute the following statement:

Life is a terminal illness contracted at birth.

by hal 9000

Actually what I think you meant to say was said by Dr C G Jung in the preface of The Tibetan Book Of The Dead and it is this

"Life is a sexually transmitted disease with an extremely bad prognosis."

If you want to get into some really heavy metaphysical stuff that a good place to start as Dr Jung goes into a lot of the differences between Eastern and Western beliefs and thought processes in this preface. He also goes into great detail explaining just why the "Western" mind can't grasp these ideas.

At the very least it makes for some good light reading.

by pgm554

You realize of course there is good amount of tongue in cheek humor in that post(wink,wink ,nudge ,nudge).

There are chemical solutions to this kind of an attitude , but if everybody did them (and a lot of sysadmins do ), who would read Sartre ,Camus or even good old Bertrand Russell ? Not to wax too philosophical , but without dark there can be no light.

I happened to catch a thread on one of the Novell general discussion groups and the amount of anti drugs (anti-depressant ,anti-anxiety)I hear folks using is food for thought.

In reference to the metaphysical thing ,the Chinese have a saying "May you live in interesting times".

Interesting times and rapid changes were foretold in a book by Alvin Toffler called Future Shock. Check it out a chuckle or two.

by jardinier

I was always under the impression that one of the best and most loved classical works, Rachmaninov's 2nd piano concerto, was composed while he was under the influence of opium. However when I checked before submitting this posting, I read another version which said that this work was his first composition after being freed from a mental block through hypnotherapy.

Actually, referring back to any earlier discussion, when I get the inspiration to start composing a song, I reach for the chocky. Peppermint cream dark chocolate works the best, and I am likely to devour 150 to 200 grams of the stuff to stay at the necessary level of inspiration until I complete the composition.

I also know that nicotine is a brain stimulant, and in the days when I used to smoke (tobacco) whenever a trigger word like "God" came up in the conversation, I would instinctively reach for a cigarette.

by jardinier

Thanks Colin, I was not aware that this quaint little gem originated with Jung. However I am fully aware of the work of Carl Jung, and have read his autobiography and am familiar with most of his ideas.
There was a split between the former colleagues, Freud and Jung, because Freud refused to acknowledge the mystical side of the human experience. Unfornately, because, in my opinion, Jung was about 50 years ahead of his time, the majority of psychologists and psychiatrists followed Freud's ideas.

Incidentally, that prolific Theosophical author, Annie Besant, said that Eastern forms of spiritual development (e.g. certain schools of Yoga) were not appropriate for Westerners because of our different genetic background and makeup.

by onbliss

..awesome. I know you are an Australian. I have read some of your posts. It looks to me that you have made some effort to understand Eastern philosophies. I commend you on that.

Similarly, I hope people from the East make an effort to understand the Western philosophies too. Different schools of thoughts makes life interesting. It does not matter if they contradict or are in conflict.

Let East and West meet........

Jul keep being an All-rounder :-) and Good Luck!!!

by john.m1

I have read every post up above
from east to west to schoolgirl love
catholics to spacemen all evolved
in the time it took for our disc to revolve
the threads contains knowledge (the total sum)
but none of it helps me find pin 1
none the less its so compelling
i even managed english spelling

by jardinier

One thing I have decided, after watching numerous documentaries about animals, plants etc, is that if God had an overall blueprint for creation (or evolution -- who cares) it was to create the maximum possible diversity of creatures and flora. Translating this concept to the human race, then I revel in the diversity of skin colours, cultures and so forth.

In regard to philosophies, I prefer to look for similarities rather than differences. As there is very little cross-conversion between the major religions, I consider most peoples' religion to be nothing more than an accident of birth. A good person born in India will be a good Hindu; a good person born in South East Asia will be a good Buddhist; a good person born in a Western country will be a good Christian.

While I enjoy and revel in the diversity, when it comes to comparing religions and philosphies, I look for commonality rather than difference. When one looks beneath the superficiality of local culture, and examines the core teachings of various religions, the differences become insignificant.

Psychologist Carl Jung (mentioned elsewhere in this discussion) travelled to many countries in the world, and as a result of studying difference cultures, developed the theory of Universal Archetypes. Jung became convinced that, no matter how different the various religions appeared on the surface, they were all based on a common set of symbols.

I daresay over the period of recorded history, as much blood has been shed over religious differences, as has been the case with ambitions of power.

At this point in time -- especially in regard to the current problems associated with Muslim fundamentalists -- we must all learn that most people have no intention of abandoning or changing their native religions. We have to learn to agree to disagree at an international level. As the differences are laid aside, the commonalities will presumably become more obvious.

by hal 9000

Carl Jung didn't originate this coment but only repeated it as it was very popular at the time. He didn't quite agree with it but could not fault the logic in it either.

However I agree with you that he was about 50 years too early and if he hadn't of been involved with Freud he would in all probability be an unknown and we would all be stuck with shrinks beliving in "Penis Fetishes" so tahnkfully there are some who dismiss Freud and place him where he belongs {a sexually repressed mothers boy.}

However unfortantly there are also many who still follow his teachings particuarly the psychologists who do little more than buy their degres blindly follow their teachings and never question them in any way.

Just to prove a point one of my dogs {a bitch} who is now dead got a correspondence psychologisty degre {actually I did the work but in her name} and she was the most highly qualified Great Dane in Brisbane at the time. I only did this to prove a point otherwise it was nothing but a waste of money.

But it did prove impressive when I introduced her as a qualified psychologist to any of the numerious qualified pyschologists that I used to run across, none believe me until I showed them the piece of paper with her name on it along with the Canine Control Councils Birth Paper. I guess that just goes to show my warped sence of humor though.

by john_wills

I was not thinking primarily of clerical celibacy, which has much to be said for and against it. I was referring to celibacy as an essential or almost-essential of the dedicated contemplative life. The great maths of Hinduism, the wats of most kinds of Buddhism, they all recognize this. So did the Muslim monasteries when they existed, and even Presbyterians when they seek such a life, as at Taize, ignore the Westminster Confession's remark that celibacy is impossible.

by hal 9000

Is something done with no concieved solution or benifit in mind when initially started. It is research for the sake of research and only aim is to improve the understanding of mankind. The fact that a lot of usefull devices or products come from this form of research is of no conquence to the research when it is under taken. On the other hand most research now days is done with the aim of producing something it could be a new drug, new device of some kind or what ever but it is always leading mankind down a blind alley as they know what they want when they start and only work to achieve this. Pure Research has no ideals or preconceptions when it starts it has nothing but a quest for knolledge that may prove usefull or may not at the moment but could at some time in the future.

A good example of this is {energy = mass times the speed of light squared} when this hypotis was first exponded it was unprovable but without it the Atom Bomb could never have been made. It is a good example of pure research that eventually led to something being produced and the whole atomic industry both medical and militery are all based around this very principal.

by hal 9000

Pin 1 is at the other end of the connector that could be anything from pin 5 to pin 80 depending on what you are trying to connect at the time.

Sorry for the tounge in cheek answer but currently we are all standing around the water cooler so shop talk isn't on the menu.

by mrbill-

At least when you were sent to the doghouse you had someone to discuss your shortcomings with. What was her rate? 5 milkbones/hour.

by mrbill-

to pin 1 which is near the power connector, or not.

It's too early for me to be funny. Some would say I am not funny anytime, but that's just my wife and family and friends and co-workers and stangers on the street. I get no respect. `:[

by onbliss

I agree gone are the days when people could be converted from one religion to another based on the sword. Ofcourse there is still lots of conversion going on in the third world countries.

I would like to say that we have reached some kind of saturation as far as religious conversions go. We should accept each other, compromise and lead our life. No point in trying to prove which culture/religion/philosophy is the better one.

by oz_media

After reading these last few posts I figured maybe I'd go on a crusade. If only I could think of something to Crusade about!

Perhapse I could write Oz's Media bible, how the media controls out thought processes and buying habits across different nations.

Matbe I could go on a crusade for converting non-smokers into smokers again, I HATE smoking outside the bars! (for those who don't know, we have a Provincial rule that yuo can't smoke in a bar, NO I'm NOT kidding, a bar and you can't smoke!!)

YAY crusade! I think I'll start this weekend.:-)
OM

by john_wills

I think the last major conversion by the sword was that of many people in the Kremlin Empire from whatever they believed before to nothing in particular now. What we might call a positive conversion by the sword occurred late in the 19th - or early in the 20th - Century in Afghanistan, when the people of Kafiristan (pagan land) were told to become Muslim or else, and their country was renamed Nuristan (light land). But violent attempts are being made in India to persuade Muslims and Christians to become Hindus, on the theory that that is their natural religion.
During the 2nd half of the 2nd Millennium a lot of people in many countries became Christian under the influence of imperial Europe, which did not however have such an effect in Dar ul Islam or the East Indies, apart from the Philippines. In the late 1960s I heard an experienced and learned Catholic missionary priest claiming that the next big wave of conversion to Christianity would be indirect, by the example of contemplatives, about whom the people would know but with whom they might have only limited intercourse. I understand from www.chartreux.org that the Pope has persuaded the Carthusians to start their next house in Korea, where there are enough Christians to provide vocations but still a majority of non-Christians, so maybe the Pope has bought that missionary priest's theory. The Cistercians and Camaldolese in California are having at best a slow effect on our post-Christian culture - but perhaps that is all one can expect.

by onbliss

...can't help that. The Hindus traditionally have been a passive community for thousands of years. They did not go about converting others into Hindus by force. Only in these modern times, fundamentalism and fanatism has grown among Hindus. It is sad that they are resorting to such violence.

by jardinier

Over the last few decades I have noted people moving away from mainstream Christianity in a number of ways:

1. Many have converted to Buddhism (because it is based on reason, and you are not required to accept anything "on faith.")
2. A very great number have joined the New Age Movement, partly because you can believe anything you like, but also because, as with Buddhism and Hinduism, belief in reincarnation is virtually mandatory.
3. Many more have tossed aside traditional Christian dogma, while retaining a general belief in God and in Jesus as an example to follow.
4. The most rapidly growing form of Christianity is of the "Charismatic" kind. This usually carries with it an extremely fundamentalist Christian doctrine.
5. A very significant proportion of Roman Catholics no longer feel obliged to follow Papal directives.

Why this drift away from traditional Christianity?
My guess would be that the deployment of atomic bombs on Japan, followed by the Nuclear Arms Race, and the acceleration of new technology have left people generally in a state of uncertainty about the future, or even tomorrow for that matter. So they are looking for something simple to believe in, or in many if not most cases, people have just given up altogether and have chosen the easy road of materialsim and instant gratification.

I think that what Alvin Toffler predicted back in the 60s in his book "Future Shock" has proven to be an acurate projection. People generally just can't adapt to change so rapidly. I have noticed that the younger generation (under 30 years of age) do not find this a problem, because it is the environment into which they were born. For older people, in so many cases it is just all too much, too quickly, and too soon.

by hal 9000

And never complained and was always there wether needed or not. But being a Great Dane she had the idea that she owned all she surveyed and I didn't actually own her but she owned both every member of my family and everything that was in and around the house {you have to have had Great Danes to understand this.}

But from a therpy point of view she was perfect and never interupted you when you where complaining about the only time that she wasn't all that helpful was when she was in season and wanted to get a bit {then you never saw her as she was always after one of the dogs} but any other time she would have made the perfect theripist and better still never have told anyone what you told her.

I used to bred Great Danes so I have a fairly one sided view on them and their ways.

by hal 9000

When these people took off on these they fought for 60 days for their Church and anything that they managed to plunder was given to the Church as spoils of war. They where not obliged to stay longer than 60 days however if they chose to they got half of everything that they managed to plunder. So these where not so much "religious wars" but a means of getting rich quick admittedly at some risk to ones self but rich none the less.

Now OZ I just don't see how you could start a cursade trying to get smoking back into bars where is the profit in this? Where do you get to Plunder Loot and Ravish Young Women without any reprisials from the police and the like because you are doing the Church's bidding so you have their protection?

Maybe I misunderstand your intentions but I don't think you'll get very far unless of course you manage to take down the anti smoking lobby perhaps you could introduce HIV into their airconditioning system so they all get infected and die out. Now that would be doing us all a favour.

by hal 9000

Where a bit of TLC all of which she got anyway but she did love being the centre of attention, well except when there where puppies involved then after they had got to a certian age she wanted nothing to do with them.

I can remember her in labour trying to take off the dogs head when he came in for a look see as he actually liked puppies which is strange for a dog {as apposed to a bitch} she was very protective of them and I was the only one who could touch them untill they reached the age where they went exploring and generally became a nusiance.

by onbliss

Can you provide some links that talk about Christians converting to Buddhism?

I keep hearing that Islam is the fastest growing religions. Heard especially it is true in America.

Well humans created Religion....and I don't believe all Religions are great!!

This discussion is closed to new replies.