Discussion Locked

No Smokers

0 helpful
156 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

This is page 2 of the discussion. Read the opening post

156 replies

by jamesrl

Are you trying to argue that you are healthier to be smoking? You'd have a hard time arguing that scientifically. As to social interaction - there are some pretty funny commercials about that right now.

Problems you have in quitting are temporary. Your blood pressure, anxiety etc. as a non smoker should be lower than you as a smoker, even though it will perhaps spike a bit during withdrawl.

And in the vast majority of cases, after a year or two of non-smoking has past, ex-smokers are almost as healthy as those who never smoked.

Did you know by the way that smoking considerably increases impotence in men - still wanna smoke?

James

by hal 9000

It would certainly keep my wife happy if I continued to smoke.

But I think the person here is talking about the "Short Term" problems after all it isn't much good it you regain your health only to find a Life Sentence for something you did like Kill that Bloody stupid End User while you where withdrawing would it?

Col :D

by house

I will not quit smoking. I'm far from impotent, but that is pretty scary to think about. :)

PS - I don't need science to back up my examples, I think that they speak for themselves.

by mrafrohead

Me or the bosses?

I agree with your thinking that the bosses think that they own us, but as far as I'm concerned, they don't own me.

I can work other places just as easily as I work here.

There's nothing that I can't do, same as you or anyone else. It's just a matter if we want to or not. If a boss tries to pull some crap like that, screw them and do something else.

:)

Mrafrohead

by jardinier

used to shoot TVs.

I would consider it VERY LIKELY that many computers/monitors have suffered the same fate.

by mrafrohead

I'll tell you, it was one of the absolute HARDEST things I've ever done. Until I actually quit. I look back on it now, and it really wasn't that hard.

It's really just getting past the mental part of it.

I have read that "Wellbutrin" works very well in helping people quit.

Something to consider if you really can't do it on your own. I believe in you though, and I believe that if you TRULY want to quit, you will.

As for the discrimination suits, bring them on. If it's MY company, it's MY rules, that's that. Those crybabies can just suck it. :) I'm not having anyone tell me how I'm going to run my company.

by mrafrohead

I like to consider myself a decent tech. At least that's what I'm told quite often. I'm actually told I'm too humble in my abilities.

And I don't smoke.

by hal 9000

Over here all the really good tech say something like well I'm not all that knowledgeable but I've had a fair bit of practice although I still have a lot to learn. Well at least the ones that I come into contact with and they all smoke.

Even my main wholesalers techs smoke as I have often been asked to fix a problem for them and instead of going straight into the workshop or whatever the head tech comes outside and over a smoke I'm told what is happening, what has been done to try to cure the problem and how like me all sharp objects are removed from anywhere near him. We tend to talk things over and then attack the unit which have always been dual or quad processor Servers.

For some idiot reason these people think I know about these things I really can not understand why though perhaps it is because I buy a lot of these M'Boards but {touch wood} I've always solved the problem "so far!" But I try to do it with the involvement of the techs there just so I do not come across as a "Know it all Bar-Steward" and when I need help they are only too willing to help me out of a problem that I've got lumbered with.

The one funny thing that I have found is that when I get a real problem and ask one of the guys here they all suggest exactly what I've already done perhaps I've been working with them all for far too long,:( but I do find it interesting just how a few people can look at the same thing and not see the obvious. Like yesterday I put down an ATX Power Supply Tester and do you think I could find it again? Even with 3 other techs here we all failed to see it on top of the case that I was about to test. As I say you do not have to be stupid but it sure as hell helps. :D

Col :)

by mrafrohead

I think that it should be illegal unless you brought enough to share with everyone... ;p

Kinda like gum when you were in elementary school.

;p

by jardinier

I also believe that moderate use of relaxing agents (including smoking) MAY be good for you in the long run.

Stress is the major killer today, and I am strongly inclined to think that it is a major cause of some types of cancer.

We can go back as far as Aristotle and the Buddha and follow the Middle Way -- avoidance of extremes.

HOWEVER the real problem relating to smoking is that young people start just to be "cool" or accepted by their peers. Can any former smoker remember their first cigarette? "Cough! Cough! Splutter, Splutter ! Yuk I think I am going to throw up."

About 30 years ago the Rev Ted Noffs of the Wayside Chapel, Sydney, founded the "Life Education" program. He was motivated to this after "burying" about 150 young people who had died of drung overdoses.

HOWEVER the program was all about preventive drug eduction. It teaches young children two things -- how their body functions and to have a respect for their body, and more importantly how to resist peer group pressure regarding taking any kind of drugs, including and especially cigarettes.

This program has been so popular that ALL primary school children in Australia get a chance to go through the program, and there are centres in many countries around the world.

Do a Google search for "life education centres" and you will see just how widely this program has spread.

by oz_media

Ahhh yes and what a smoke it was!

I had smoked pot long before a cigarette though, as most kids here seem to. Pot is easier to come across than money for smokes. Anyone will smoke a joint with you but they won't part with a cigarette these days.

My first smoke was an Export plain (my dad's of course) and after about two years I started smoking Export'A' filter, I have smoked alomst any brand on the market but have always reverted to Export 'A' Light.

I didn't start because it was cool, though I admit many if not most do. I started (beyond the first couple I had scooped from my dad's pack)because I had a cigar on a camping trip in Scouts and then bought a pack of smokes on the way home.
That's when it actually became a habit.

I quite for a year and a half once, then yet again was on a canoe trip about (17 years old) and smoked a cigar while floating across a lake with my Lime and Vodka in one hand. After that, back to smoking full time again.

So for me it was camping, I suppose, or drinking, or just that it looked good and was something I craved without before becoming addicted. Aftetr that it was all downhill.

by hal 9000

I'm in AU so it is the middle of the night here so what does that make me? :(

Col :D

by hal 9000

And funnily enough that is exactly what I did well I've done it many times now just walk away smiling.

The one I really loved was when I worked for IBM all those years ago now and I was punished for repairing mainframe boards apparently the "Powers that Be" didn't like the fact that I had a stock of -60 of the things or maybe it was the ones that I fixed didn't break again anyway I was sent to purgatory as the tech for a fuel injection subsidiary who supplied fuel injection equipment to all the AU race teams. Apparently the Electronic Engineers hated this position as they had to attend race meetings on the weekends durring the season and where on call all the time at least durring the season. What they forgot about me was that I had started out building Race Cars from the ground up so instead of punishment it was a reward for me and I got to mix with all the old friends who treated me as an honored guest. After 3 years they eventually put their foot down and demanded that I return to working with those Main Frames so I just walked away straight into one of the race teams then they had to contend with all the others crying foul because the team that I joined had an unfair advantage.

But I did love the look on my immediate boss face when he realized exactly what the accountants had done. I believe quite a few words where said back at head office about not looking up education or previous employment details when handing out punishment to people like me.

But I was only attempting to keep my customers happy and more to the point working after all they had spent so much money on these things and there was a 6 month waiting time for replacement parts. It is kind of hard or at least I find it that way to have tell someone that they are going to be loosing a large portion of their processing power for such a long time. Maybe that is why I'm a tech and not a salesperson. But now I run my own business I can do as I please and for some strange reason I'm selling more new computers now that ever before and I'm enjoying it.

Col :D

by hal 9000

But what is next?

I love to ride big fast motorcycles so should I be considered as a "High Risk Worker?"

The companies that I have worked for have a right to my time while they are paying me but they do not own me body and soul I have a life away {or at least I used to} from work and I believe that people should be able to do whatever they like. Take skydiving for instance to me jumping out of a perfectly good airplane is stupid but I do have friends who partake in this activity and at least one only works to pay for all the jumps he can make. He's represented his country at international competitions and to him work was only a means to an end.

Granted he has now stopped this activity but only after his wife who he meet skydiving got pregnant and they decided that they sought of had a responsibility to the child.

Where is the line drawn? Do you think it acceptable to have genetic testing before you can even be considered for a job?

Col

by dnvrtechgrrl

That's why I ask what's next.
I can see how companies are concerned about their bottom dollar. Lord knows as a business owner I wouldn't want to pay the benefits on someone who's purposely killing their health; knowing I'd have to foot part of the final bill.

I get the economics issue here.

I just think we've crossed a huge line here. As a nation and as a "unified" people.

There are some issues in this country that need to be addressed before they get out of hand. We are finding more and more way to discriminate against one another; not fewer.

Who wants to live under a government where it's people are told whom to marry, how to spend their free time, etc?

Isn't that why our soldiers are dying over seas? Fighting a very similar issue of government overstepping it's bounds?

by oz_media

:) I gotta admit, that'd be pretty dangerous.

I am a licenced mechanic, I understand drinking in a safe yet quickly dangerous environment.

When I was in my apprenticeship as a machinist, I watched a guy lose half his hair in a lathe, while stoned.

I watched a guy blow half his ass of because he was a welder and carried a Bic lighter in his pocket, after a liquid lunch, wouldn't have been that stupid if he had his senses about him.

I can understand your point, it is for workplace safety. In the case of an OFFICE building stopping people from being smokers OFF HOURS, that one just bows my mind.

As i said before, what's next...body fat tests for obesity that may result in an early heart attack and place your company's precious insurance policy at risk of actually being used? Heaven forbid!

They have all these "benefits" but they will curb your own habits in order to make sure the benefits aren't used?

by oz_media

Why Canada has decriminalized small amounts (though replacing criminal charges with fines WAY more harmful that a possesion record).

There IS enough to go around, a few times.

HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

I just read backwards in the thread, assuming that if you were talking about smell and not enough to go around, you weren't talking about popcorn.

Now I fear I may have read that wrong! You prbably WERE talking about popcorn! :D

by tony hopkinson

Pregancy is a fun one.
If an employee becomes pregant, by law an employer must hold her employment open.
If her position is filled, or a restructured out of the business they must offer her an equivalent position.
If they cannot/do not do this they will be prosecuted or must pay her off with a redundancy package which she does not have to accept.

Also now under EU law, her spouse can claim paternity leave and again his job is held open. Bloody socialists eh ?

by jdclyde

The CONDTION of being pregant goes away. It is cureable without meds. Not a life long illness. (catch what I was saying? Attempt at humor, guess not a good one?)

Yes, the job waits for you here as well. (two months I think in US?) Not sure how long they get. (no pay of course)

Though I can't see a mom coming back to work for two years. The kids need a mom there more than they need that second income.

When my twins were born we worked it that my wife stayed home because I had the bigger pay check to get by on. After they got two, we started to work alternative shifts so one of us would almost always be there for the boys.

After paying payroll taxes and daycare, it would have been crazy for us to have done otherwise.

by house

Bloody socialists is right!!!

Let's just say that an intelligent employer will find alternative means in shaking these left wing abusers. ...don't even mention the Union - ha - racketeering at it's finest. What a brilliant business idea. :)

by mrafrohead

Believe me, I dont' think I'm the brightest bulb in the box. Far from it.

As a matter of fact, the more I learn, the more I learn I really don't know that much and have a L_O_N_G way to go... ;p

I just have a wierd ability with hardware. Maybe it's luck I don't know. But for some reason I'm very good at fixing it. Software takes more work. But I can always figure out a problem if I really want to.

As I believe anyone can, because if I can do it, so can anyone else.

I don't like to gloat, I'm just being honest in here right now. Normally you won't get this out of me... ;p

by hal 9000

Yesterday I got a call from a very close friend and was told he had died. Apparently he had a massive heart attach and was dead before he hit the ground. Unexpected, shocking and a lot of other thoughts rushed through my head until I remembered him telling me about what hid Doctor was getting him to do.

He stopped smoking almost stopped drinking only the occasional beer now and again and after a 24 month medically supervised detox program he was pronounced as fit as possible for a man his age 52. Within 6 days he was dead, now his Doctor had told him that if he didn't stop smoking & drinking he would be dead within 10 years.

Maybe it's just me but after going through all the crap and missing all of his pleasures in life to live for 6 days seems a bit pointless to me, if it was me I'd continue smoking & drinking at least that way I would have enjoyed myself before checking out. This guy was told his heart was undamaged and that was not a problem he didn't even have high blood pressure none of the tell tale sings that should have been there because he was a heavy smoker. Personally I think his body was just getting back at him for stopping all of its enjoyment but whatever happened it wasn't worth what he went through to become healthy. :(

Col

by hal 9000

To be tired you must need sleep and I do not! :(

Actually I've just had MS on the phone asking for feedback on some issues and the girl couldn't understand my description of my position here which is "Alleged Boss and Official Scape Goat" I had to explain it to her and then she understood and even thought it made sense. Now that is scary isn't it? :)

Col :D

by tonythetiger

Everybody will die of something eventually. If that person happened to smoke, then whatever they died of will be labeled a "Smoking Related Illness" by the whackos. (Yep, the poor guy... wife made him go outside to smoke his pipe, and wouldn't you know, he was crossing the street, paused halfway across to light his pipe, and was narrowly missed by a car that ran the light. But when he got to the other side to sit on the bus stop bench to smoke, a truck went out of control, jumped the curb, and and killed him. So sad... another smoking related death)

... I'd like to know is: Why are there (admittedly few) people around in their 90's or 100's who smoked for most of their lives?

by bhunsinger

NO NO NO. this is why I was against the Clinton healthcare plan. "We pay for your health care, that gives us the right to regulate anything about your life. Make them pay the priemum for health care, ok. Breathalyzer tests!!! AAAQAARRRRRRCCCCHHYHHHHH for lack of expressions to delicate for your sister's (&my) ears.

by jamesrl

In Canada where the government health plan pays most medical costs(except dental, non-medical electives, drugs), the government does try to lower costs by promoting a healthy lifestyle. But it does not dictate or regulate lifestyles. Do HMOs dictate lifestyle or increase premiums for smokers?

I have heard of doctors threatening to cut off treatment to smokers who have chronic conditions - but thats for the medical associations, not the government, to deal with.

James

by tonythetiger

In the US, tobacco tax is a major source of income for government. They SAY they want you to quit, but secretly they really don't.

by house

Nuff said... he had a massive attack in detox.

Sorry to hear that Colin...

Chris

by house

Did you ever smell those Candy store Kiosks in the mall when they're brewing up some mad popcorn. It stinks. For some reason, it reminds me of processsed ham and highschool biology labs. Yuck. :)

by tonythetiger

My grandmother died of old age at 98 in 1991. She had dementia. Her brain started shutting down. She didn't know who anyone was, but she knew she wanted her "damned Lucky Strikes" There was nothing wrong with her heart or lungs. She lived her entire life without running water or even an indoor bathroom. She never learned to drive or owned a car.

We know that medical technology has provided longer life for a lot of people who, frankly, wouldn't have lived more than a few days or weeks out of the womb 50 or 100 years ago.

I submit that these people have diluted the gene pool to the point that these diseases have become more prevalent. It's a big joke when you think about it. The medical community has created its own customers!

There are people who never get cancer or heart disease or high blood pressure or diabetes, with little matter how they live or what their health choices are. Until the medical community can explain this, it will be kinda difficult logically to believe them when they say X causes Y. There's a reason they call it "Practicing Medicine".

by hal 9000

Exhaust fumes from cars or dust from brake pads/shoes or clutches which is far more harmful to people.

A good example of this was in a shop that I once worked in where if the front door was left open the whole shop was covered in a fine film of black dust at the end of every day. Of course it was on a main road and air-conditioning and an air curtain cured the problem of the shop getting dirty but it didn't stop all of the gunk being breathed in while outside.

When was the last time you heard a pollution alert that was put down to smokers?

Col :)

by mrafrohead

Oh wait, you were talking about coffee werent' you... ;p silly me...

@ thanks for the kind words above!

by tonythetiger

two groups of people who have a higher than average incidence of attention deficit disorder. Smokers and IT people :^)

by tonythetiger

This is aeally a reply to mrafrohead

It's called "The Touch". You either got it, or you have to spend a lot of money learning it, but it's kinda like auto body work, or painting (pictures). There's only so much that can be taught.

by tonythetiger

They've added some rules here that, if you refuse overtime, or are not available, for so many occurences, you can be reprimanded.

by william.baker

While I agree that this is a slippery slope, I, a non smoker, get angry when I see the loss of productivity due to smoking.

I have a co-worker that goes out each hour for a smoke. Because of the time it takes to get out of the building, smoke, go through security to get back in, and get to the office, he uses between 10 and 20 minutes each hour. At the end of his 8 hours, he goes home.

I, who don't smoke, work 55-60 minutes in an hour.

At the end of the day, I have worked 7 hours 25 minutes (figure 55 minutes *7 hours). He has worked 6 hours 50 minutes (figure 10 minute {very conservative} for each butt).

This doesn't seem like much 45 minutes/day. Until you add it up.

Our breaks are not regulated, we are adults. In the end, however, I realize that he makes more money than I do because his actual money earned for actual time worked is greater.

The answer is to have regulated breaks, but nobody really wants that. I just see that my employeer is paying this person to be non productive. That is not fair either.

by hal 9000

While you may see this time as wasted maybe he is walking away from a problem to think on it rather than stand/sit in front of the thing and not get anywhere.

Now I really do not mean to sound rude here but can you positively say that you really work 55-60 minutes per hour?

What about walking to the coffee machine for a drink, or if you do not drink tea or coffee the fridge for a drink, the time taken to go to the toilet or any other number of reasons that you are not sitting at a desk shuffling papers or whatever. What you have to remember is that looking busy is not actually being busy.

Now I really do not know the exact position where you work and quite frankly I really do not want to know either but what you have to understand is that different people look at the same thing differently.

What you personally are seeing as a waste of time and an unfair advantage on yourself could very well be seen as something totally different by others and since the other person still has a job and as you say at a greater pay rate than yourself he must be doing something right.

But there is one thing that I can say for certain that when I worked in an office environment I never got to work 55-60 minutes per hour even considering incoming phone calls as job related at best I could only get about 45 minutes per hour of actual work done as I was constantly called away to do other things that where not directly connected to my real job. Most of the time I was really lucky if I got 25 minutes of real work done per hour. But I do not consider going and helping out others as real work just something that is necessary to keep the place running smoothly.

The only time that we ever got close to spending a full 60 minutes per hour working was when we shut the place down to everything outside and just got on with the job which was always a rush thing that had to be done in far less time than we actually had. We didn't even stop to do the weekly orders when this was happening as we had already pre-ordered everything that we would require before starting the work. Back in those days we could smoke at the work bench or desk or whatever you want to call it and we didn't get anything like a full hours work done per hour. There where just so many other things that required the attention of someone from the service department and shock horror we not only ran at a profit we where constantly being hauled up before management with complaints we where making too much money as we where supposed to be offering a "Service" to the companies customers not making money which we where hand over fist. Back in those days I never had a budget cut never had to reduce staff or anything similar we grew and as we grew in staff numbers we also increased our profits. At the end we where making more from service work that was supposed to be nothing more than a convenience for the customers than the sales department was making and what made things even worse was the fact that my techs sold more product of the right type for the job than the Sales Department ever could hope to sell. They always tried to sell to a price rather than to the required job where as the Service Department sold what was required by the customer. Of course this all went to hell when the accounts in charge of the company insisted on putting sales people in the service department to sell new product. What had taken me 5 years to put right took them less than 18 months to destroy along with the good reputation that we had built up for the company.

It now no longer exists all because of short slightness by the accountants who ran the show, if they had of left us alone we would still be working there and selling more than the accounts could ever hope to sell as well as not having a good reputation but a Great Reputation for offering service to our customers and therefore making more of everything that kept the company alive.

But I suspose it all depends on the job you are doing and how you define work. Government Departments seem to be extremely happy if you just look busy and it doesn't matter if you are actually producing anything it is all looks that matter to them.

Col

by bhunsinger

Let's see, first you say they have to leave the building to smoke because it bolthers you (generic nonsmoker, not previous poster), Then you complain because they have to leave. Note: if this is a mental job, you can carry the job with you sitting at a desk is not working, thinking is.

by bsroufek

Supposing the employer has a right to engage in intrapersonal enfringements, the right can be regarded as a priviledge so long as the employee continues employment; perilously, should former or soon to be former employers continue in their exercises, we shouldn't bother with passports or shooting ranges, figuratively speaking of course.

BrianS

by house

We can't smoke in bars, restaurants, and generally any public where it was once allowed.

They have even gotten rid of the designated rooms. It has worked to our advantage though, as most restaurants and bars in town have wicked patio areas now. It doesn't help much in -30 celcius weather though. Oh well... even though I smoke, the smoke used to bother me a bit.

by house

Did you read the post titled "fire the fatties?" I was thinking about something else there. :) I guess he was talking about obesity.

It must be a Canadian thing!!!

by lll3

This sounds like a good solution.

The main objection I have to working with smokers is the smell when I have to be near them, and walking in/out of the building -- and the cigarette butts.

I think companies should be able to hire who they want -- it's their business afterall-- but at the same time it's a little creepy to think they're basing a decision on a personal habit that is LEGAL.

If it turns out it DOES cost the company money in terms of sick time and health insurance, I would take that into consideration.

by nlatsha

I've found this same thing to be true.

Plus, when you are having some sort of problem, the five minutes it takes to go outside, talk to your IT comrades, away from the keyboard, makes you less punchy. As in, try this, and that, and this. You actually get the time to think about the problem, possible causes, solutions, etc. I've brought back entire mission systems because of the cigarette factor... Then when its up, time for another, to reflect on what happend, what worked, what didn't, etc. I have a much better working relationship with fellow smokers than I do with non-smokers, you learn alot more about different areas as well...

by nlatsha

We had another stress reliever in the office, the sledgehammer.

Along with boxes of useless hard drives, it makes for a very fulfilling, suitable destruction method.

by pjbski

SSA (Social Security Adminiatration) came out with a pronouncement a few years ago about the Cigarette lawsuit settlement. Based on HHS (Health & Human Services) analysis of expected smoking trends after the settlement due to the expected increases in cigarette prices, SSA said that the SS Trust funds would go bust sooner than expected due to the longer lifetimes of retirees who would have quit. Negative cash flow by 2013, bankrupt by 2029. (Latest numbers are 2018 & 2042.) Of course, these expectations are highly speculative.

This discussion is closed to new replies.