Odd contract phrasing: "renewable?"
I am determining the obligations of an old contract with my main client. The original contract was signed on or around March 1, 2000, and the phrasing of the duration is as follows:
"The term of this agreement is for 2 years and will commence onMarch 1, 2000 and is automatically renewable in 1 year increments unless either party terminates the agreement as stated in section 9."
(Section 9 stipulates 90 days written notice is required. That's the possible sticking point. I want to be fair to this client -- they've been very good -- but my next client probably won't wait 90 days for me. 30 days seems reasonable all around.)
This is the only contract I have ever signed with them. The two years are long since over. The questionfor me then, is "Am I still bound now by this contract?"
It says the term is for 2 years -- so as of March 1, 2002 it's hold on me should be over. But...it says it's "automatically renewable in 1 year increments." What exactly does that mean? Does "automaticaly renewable" mean it actually IS automatically renewed/extended? Or does "renewable" mean we *could have* renewed it, perhaps by signing an addendum to it?
Looking at it more carefully now, it seems rather contradictory.
Thanks,
- Tom