Discussion Locked

Opinion on 2000

0 helpful

11 replies

by kashmeir63 Nov 24, 2002 last reply Jan 20, 2003

Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Hi,
I have a windows nt4.0 environment...
I'm just starting to populate the client's pc's w/windows 2000 pro...
In a opinion is it better to give them ntfs or fat 32 when I'm setting up the explorer security.
I do know ntfs gives better security...

11 replies

by cg it Nov 24, 2002

You've answered your own question.

by kashmeir63 Jan 20, 2003

Poster rated this answer

by ann777 Nov 25, 2002

If you're looking at file security, then yes, ntfs is best.

by kashmeir63 Jan 20, 2003

Poster rated this answer

by shmaltz Nov 25, 2002

Not only for security but reliability is another reason.

by kashmeir63 Jan 20, 2003

Poster rated this answer

by an_it_guy Nov 25, 2002

As others have stated, NTFS would be a better choice. Heres a link worth a look, which gives everything about NTFS and also compares it with FAT.
http://www.ntfs.com/ntfs_vs_fat.htm
Hope this helps.

by kashmeir63 Jan 20, 2003

Poster rated this answer

by boegel Dec 1, 2002

I would suggest ntfs as it does provide better security.

by kashmeir63 Jan 20, 2003

Poster rated this answer

by kashmeir63 Jan 20, 2003

This question was closed by the author

This discussion is closed to new replies.

11 replies

Trending Software posts

How Are Teams Testing AI-Generated Code Before Production?

Icons, favicons and merch graphics on Squarespace: my workflow for getting

Network Printer Works for Everyone Except Me

Can I Print Emails Directly from a PST File

Is There any Reverse Video Search Tool