General discussion


Peer Messages from the "tolerant" Left?

By jdclyde ·
We hear all the time from the loonie left about the intolerant religious right. It has been almost a battle cry for at least the last decade.

Just how "tolerant" are these same loonie lefties with anything that they don't agree with? Here is an example from FAKE James (JamesG ) from Albuquerque, NM, not the REAL one (JamesRL) up in Canada.

One of your fellow TechRepublic members has sent you a private message:

From: JamesG@...
Subject: abortion
Typical Repugnant fool - keep government out of our lives! Freedom! Wait, you want to make a mdeical decision I don't agree with??? You can't have an abortion!! I don't approve!!
Well, keep your right wing fascist nose out of my wifes panty hose, you f@@k.

Thanks fake James. You have confirmed everything I had thought about you.

For the casual reader, you may be asking "what the H E double L is he going off on?"

I have to ASSuME that this is in regards to a recent discussion with "ABSOLUTELY". I was comparing the contradictions for both Dems and Reps, and he made the contention that Abortions are NOT "birthcontrol".

(my post, his reply, then my reply.)

My counter was:
"Abortion for non-life threatening reasons, or the rape/incest IS birthcontrol because that is the only function being performed. Controlling birth."

At no point did I discuss making this illegal or preventing FAKE James from taking his wife for as many abortions as his sick little heart wants. I only made the call of being HONEST enough to call it what it is. If you are not willing to be honest about this FAKE James, so be it. Maybe you can get frequent flier miles if you do it enough and pay for it with your credit card?

Abortions should be safe, legal, and rare is the stance I have always taken. Don't worry FAKE James, I will stay out of your wifes panies.

(what are some people thinking?)

NOTE: see how nice I was to NOT post his email address, as he has peer messages turned off? Of course, that doesn't stop him from peering others, OR putting his comments in the dicussion where they originate from? No, lets make it a personal attack instead? Nice and tolerant of you FAKE JamesG. Real nice. By the way, to you eat with that mouth?

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

Yeah I agree with you but before you reject..............

by sleepin'dawg In reply to Peer Messages from the "t ...

the probably excellent opportunity of getting into her panty hose, don't you think you should see her first??? I said excellent opportunity based upon the post is from FAKE JamesG. A dillhole like that probably isn't keeping the home fires burning, so to speak. You might be performing the poor girl a service. But then she did marry FAKE James so she is either blond or ugly enough to gag a maggot on a gut wagon; you'd have to see her first before deciding. :^O

Dawg ]:)

Collapse -

Sorry Dawg, but

by jdclyde In reply to Yeah I agree with you but ...

I like a woman with STANDARDS. B-)

Collapse -

Poke him in the eye, JD

by neilb@uk In reply to Peer Messages from the "t ...

I might not agree with your stance on abortion (might?) but when I read your views on an open forum I respect them enough to answer in public.

To send you emails like that is the act of a complete idiot and one who is obviously afraid of public debate on his views. Some might agree with him but they've little chance of showing that if he doesn't want to post them publicly.

Keep out of her panties, pal. They're probably too big to fit you properly. Anyway, if her taste in men is anything to go by...

p.s Just to stir the pot - abortion for rape or incest is also birth control and if you can agree to abortion under those circumstances...

Collapse -

If you disagree

by jdclyde In reply to Poke him in the eye, JD

then you MUST be mistaken!

You disagree that abortion should not be a casual thing of "oh dang! I'm knocked up again!"?

It did take me a bit to figure out what FAKE James was going on about, as there hasn't been a lot of discussions about this topic recently and I didn't remember EVER saying ANYTHING to him about it. Like I said, I can only ASSuME that this was what his friendly email was about.

To put the lid on the pot before it boils over, still a form of birth control, but not because of an "oops" based on the babykillers part. (I almost kept that neutral.....)

Besides, about the panties. He sounds like one of those "abused husbands" that they talk about in the news. Goes home and she kicks his a$$ from one side of the house to the other. :^O

Collapse -

"oh dang! I'm knocked up again!"?

by Absolutely In reply to If you disagree

Do you realize that your stance amounts to encouraging people that stupid to bring more children into the country? We already have enough morons, whatever side of every other argument on every other issue you take. We're falling behind third world countries in math & science and we've been behind the industrialized world for years. The United States is already riding on foreign (immigrant) skill. Let's not add to the dead weight sector of the economy, and of the gene pool.

Collapse -

We could always take the same approach

by jdclyde In reply to "oh dang! I'm knocked up ...

as the Japanise and setup programs the SEVERLY punish people that have more than one child. Of course I don't think we would have the same stigma of it HAVING to be a boy, saving us the added expense of putting signs on all the bridges "please don't drown your babies here".

Would this be more to your liking?

The problem, is when people at the bottom of the gene pool are allowed to breed at will and still have someone else pick up the tab. The more kids you pop out, the more money Democrats will want to throw at you. So, who is it that CREATED this mess?

And you KNOW you laughed when you read the quote.... ;\

Collapse -

Not Japan, China

by JamesRL In reply to We could always take the ...

Its China that has the restrictions.

What often happens is girl babies get dropped off at orphanages. If you want to adopt a baby, and you want a girl, China has a huge supply.


Collapse -

Beat me to it James!

by jdclyde In reply to Not Japan, China

I KNEW that, but was big time rushed to finish the post.

My boss had a meeting setup with some potential vendors that he forgot about. He isn't in this morning. (oops).

So when the front office called asking for him, I called him on his cell, and guess who got stuck holding the meeting with people he had NEVER heard of before?? Three guesses only......

Is it too late to pull a Neil quick-switch and change my origianl post to leave you hanging James?

Collapse -

Babies from China

by Jellimonsta In reply to Not Japan, China

Adopting a baby from China is pretty expensive (around $25K).

Also, adopting from orphanages can cause issues due to the fact that the child will not have any stimulation at a young age, and this causes emotional conditions that can cause sensitivity to touch. This is also evident with children adopted from orphanages in Russia, or other parts of the world.

Collapse -


by Jaqui In reply to Not Japan, China

a couple of 22 year old chinese girls.... ]:)
]:) ]:) where are those restraints again...

Related Discussions

Related Forums