Community archive

Ask something
Discussion Locked

Question about the peer rankings

0 helpful
3 replies

by oz_media

Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

I am wondering about the rating scale for peer rankings. From what I remember, it also includes posts to Tech Q&A and is based on answers rejected as well as answers accepted, is this correct?

ie: a post in tech Q&A for example would help the ranking, and accepted answer would improve it again, and a rejected answer would take away from it.

Is this correct?

3 replies

by hal 9000

But judging by the lack of response by a lot of those asking questions and then ignoring the question I can not see how that would work.

Currently I think I'm running at about 61% of unrated answers, and then there are the questions that have been closed with no accepted answers probably to save a few lousy Tech points which I no longer see anywhere but beside your Alias in the different threads.

I'm trying to get a permanent site rating of 666 but failing that I'll settle for a 69 site ratting. :p

Col ]:)

by hal 9000

Allow me to do anything? :p

After all it is supposed to be the "Number of the Beast!" And who could say no to the Beast? ;)

69 would be way too limiting. :^O

Col ]:)

This discussion is closed to new replies.