I am wondering about the rating scale for peer rankings. From what I remember, it also includes posts to Tech Q&A and is based on answers rejected as well as answers accepted, is this correct?
ie: a post in tech Q&A for example would help the ranking, and accepted answer would improve it again, and a rejected answer would take away from it.
Is this correct?
This conversation is currently closed to new comments.
But judging by the lack of response by a lot of those asking questions and then ignoring the question I can not see how that would work.
Currently I think I'm running at about 61% of unrated answers, and then there are the questions that have been closed with no accepted answers probably to save a few lousy Tech points which I no longer see anywhere but beside your Alias in the different threads.
I'm trying to get a permanent site rating of 666 but failing that I'll settle for a 69 site ratting.
If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.
Question about the peer rankings
ie: a post in tech Q&A for example would help the ranking, and accepted answer would improve it again, and a rejected answer would take away from it.
Is this correct?