General discussion

Locked

The OTHER 2004 election winners and loosers

By Aldanatech ·
Well its already a week after the election, and I thought this would be a good time to look at the OTHER winners and losers in the 2004 Presidential Election and discuss about them. Feel free to agree or disagree with any of them:

Winner: Osama bin Laden. The president's champions can bray all they want about how Bush understands the central issue of our time ? that we're fighting World War IV against Islamic fascism ? but the fact remains that, three years after 9/11, bin Laden is issuing tapes mocking the president, America's emergency services still aren't prepared for another attack, and the war on terror has taken a disastrous detour into Iraq. Unable to conceive of fighting militant Islam with anything other than guns, Bush and his "you are either for us or against us" manner have turned much of the non-Islamic world fervently against the U.S. You can only imagine how much stronger these feelings are in the Islamic world. On Election Day, bin Laden's dream came true: America re-elected his greatest recruiting tool.

Loser: John Edwards. Remember when the senator from North Carolina was the charismatic newcomer praised for his dazzling political talent? That was three months ago. Today, he's the guy who did nothing for the ticket. He didn't help the Democrats win North Carolina. He didn't help the Democrats win a single swing state. And he didn't even make any memorable speeches. The least what he could have done was pull a Lieberman and keep his Senate seat ?- which went over to the GOP. Had Edwards turned down Kerry's offer, he would today be the 2008 front-runner for the nomination. Instead, the Breck Girl became the Invisible Man, imperceptible but for the stain of defeat.

Winner: Machiavelli (Mayberry Branch). Concerned only with preserving power, Karl Rove spent the last four years engaged in what pollster Pat Caddell once dubbed "the permanent campaign" ? scripting every moment of Bush's presidency according to a political calculus. And what a calculus! Under his guidance, the Bush-Cheney campaign didn't fret about lying, pandering to the reactionary base, trashing its opponents' courage and patriotism, or polarizing America so deeply that half the country was sickened and infuriated by its own president. All that mattered was getting one more vote than his opponent. Rove got his win. Whether such politics could destroy America doesn't worry him at all. For in Wilde's famous words, he's the very embodiment of a cynic: He knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.

Loser: The Republican Party. Sure, the right will now feel empowered to pursue countless ghastly ideas: Alan Keyes for chief justice! Voting rights for fetuses! Social Security outsourced to Halliburton! But it will also be forced to deal with the consequences of its decisions. The only satisfaction in Kerry's losing is knowing that Bush will spend his second term grappling with the mess in Iraq, the shambles of the budget, the fury of seniors at the lousy new Medicaid program, and the next big terror attack on U.S. soil ? which regrettably, he won't be able to stop. Far from becoming the thousand-year reich predicted by Grover Norquist, in four years Republicans will be crumbling under the weight of their own mistakes, and will have nobody else to blame.

Loser: Fox News. Roger Ailes' boys may have spent Wednesday chortling because their man won the election (not that a fair and balanced network has a favorite, of course), but the network would have been much better off had Kerry won the election. The right-wing media's ascent is fueled by grievance and outrage ? conservative talk radio was made by the Clinton years ? but it's hard to keep spanking the liberal elite five years into Republican domination of the White House, Congress and the Supreme Court, not to mention countless corporate boardrooms. During Bush's second term, Fox will be forced to defend the increasingly indefensible. That's lousy TV ? and Ailes knows it. How much more fun ? and better for ratings ? to take potshots at a windsurfing Democratic president with a suspiciously good French accent.

Loser: Exit polling. During Election Day, exit polls showed that Kerry was on his way to a clear-cut victory. What went wrong? Did pollsters sample the wrong precincts? Did voters lie (perhaps embarrassed to tell "the media" they were voting for Bush)? Or did those electronic voting machines do exactly what everyone had feared ? skew the election? A fascinating thought. After all, exit polls were reckoned reliable until the 2000 presidential election. It's still too early to know, but were the exit polls as wrong about Senate races as they were about the presidential contest?

Winner: The religious right. For months we've been hearing about how the Democrats were registering millions of new young voters. Either the kids didn't show up on Tuesday or, more likely, they just weren't as liberal as everyone thought ? Pew estimated that Kerry led Bush among the young by 5 to 4. Meanwhile, the Republicans were registering scads of evangelicals, and unlike the kids, they voted as a bloc ? over 80 percent went for born-again Bush. The religious right now can stake even more enormous claim on the White House. One only wonders when (if?) it will stop behaving as if Christians are a beleaguered, abused minority in the U.S. This isn't ancient Rome, folks. Nero is one of yours.

Loser: Charles Darwin. The Polish social philosopher Leszek Kolakowski observed that one horror of communist ideology was that it had a theory of everything ? from genetics to composing symphonies. The same is true of Christian conservatism, which seems eager to roll back centuries of scientific discovery. For them, the Beagle hasn't landed. Thanks to this election, we can expect more and more schools to start teaching the bogus Theory of Intelligent Design (which has the added disadvantage, scientifically, of not actually being a theory) as if it were real science and not a debased offshoot of theological doctrine.

Loser: Women. Now that he no longer fears losing re-election, Bush will be free to appoint Supreme Court justices who will finally overturn Roe v. Wade. Which raises once again the question posed by my old colleague Michael Ventura: Why do pro-life activists identify so deeply with the fetus and not with the woman carrying it? Is it because they themselves feel as powerless as an "unborn child"?

Winner: The Anti-Bush Industry. According to definitive statistics, over the last 12 months a Bush-bashing book has been published every 4.3 seconds. If Kerry had won the election, deathless works by the likes of Michael Moore, Al Franken and the scintillating Graydon Carter would have fallen into the dustbin of history. Thanks to Dubya's victory, these books can enjoy a prosperous life in paperback. Bush's victory may be bad for the world, but it's certainly good for them. And who am I to say that's a bad thing?

Source: AlterNet

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

2 total posts (Page 1 of 1)  
| Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Back to Community Forum
2 total posts (Page 1 of 1)  

Related Discussions

Related Forums