General discussion


This puts a whole new meaning on the term

By Jaqui ·
Bloodsucking Politition.

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

Vast Psychic Powers

by BFilmFan In reply to This puts a whole new mea ...

I predict he loses. Massively.

Collapse -

but you have to

by Jaqui In reply to Vast Psychic Powers

concider, this state did elect a pro wrestler as governor before, they might do something crazy and elect this guy.

Collapse -

Not so far fetched

by Oz_Media In reply to but you have to

Look who they elected as president....TWICE. Sometimes you just gotta laugh, unfortunately it's not really a laughing matter when one man sets out to screw the world, especially when people support it.

Collapse -


by M_a_r_k In reply to Not so far fetched

"Look who they elected as president"

How did you jump from an election for governor of Minnesota to George Dubya being elected president by a whole country? "They", as in Minnesota, didn't help put Bush in office. They went for the Democrat in 2000 and 2004.

2000 election:

2004 election:

Collapse -

Which proves the point

by Montgomery Gator In reply to "they"?

The people of Minnesota were stupid enough to vote for Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004, they might do something dumb like vote for the vampire.

Collapse -

hey, give the vampire credit....

by Jaqui In reply to Which proves the point

he at least admits he's a bloodsucker. most politicians deny it.

Collapse -


by Montgomery Gator In reply to hey, give the vampire cre ...

Very true. Could Paul Martin be described as a bloodsucker?

Collapse -


by Oz_Media In reply to Not so far fetched

I think Jacqui knows who THEY are, THEY is/are America(ns), when you don't live in America. :)

Follows the old adage, "Only in America".

Collapse -

Yes, and some of us

by Old Guy In reply to Not so far fetched

were really disappointed when Clinton got elected the second time. B-)

Collapse -

I'm sure you were

by Oz_Media In reply to Yes, and some of us

There's a popular term I am sure you've heard many times. Two wrongs don't make a right. So you personally feel that Bush is better than Clinton, Clinton didnt really do anything to save your souls, I understand that he was not your favorite.

Does this then make GWB a good president by deault or something?

Clinton stuck his head in the sand, and Lewinsky, but he isn't responsible for a rash decision that killed thousands of Americans in a pathetic attempt to save America from impending doom, that wasn't really imperative or justified in any real way to begin with.

Related Discussions

Related Forums