4 replies
by vinnyd
Logging off will close all open applications and datafiles.
Locking the computer leaves the applications open and the files open.
Open files will not be backed up unless your network has an Open Files agent to backup the open files.
Hope this helps
by w2ktechman
for short term I would suggest just locking the system (20 min or less). But if it will be for a long time it is better to log off.
If a user is logged off, they are not connected to network resources (most likely), which can help speed things up a little for other users. Also, if logged off it is less likely to unknowingly spread a virus through email and active network connections. There are other reasons as well, but I think this should justify your company's policy, especially in this day and age
by cptomlly
There are also some arguments for locking rather than logging off.
1. Increased productivity by not having to wait for all connections to be re-established, logon scripts to run, reopen all your applications, etc. On some slow workstations, logon time is 1-2 min vs. 5 sec for password entry for unlock.
2. Physical security for the workstation is stronger, because only the user or an admin can unlock the machine.
3. You can set the PC to lock automatically whenever the screensaver activates, which means less "forgotten" logoffs.
You should also consider that most viral threats will be just as well protected with the PC locked as with it logged off. Unless you are completely powering off, you still have the services running, locked or logged off.
We have used the "lock" policy on our Win2K network with 500+ for 2+ years without adverse effects due to the policy. However, we do not back up any data located on users workstations, only network drives data. You could definitely have problems as VinnyD pointed out.
In conclusion, I would say that the benefits of the lock policy outweigh they negatives.
by armour
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Community archive posts
Sort by Trending