Traffic Laws
Rather than continuing to corrupt another thread, I thought I would start a new thread. Especially after seeing some of the more interesting comments on traffic laws.
First off, I admit to being a reformed speeder. As such, like a reformed anything, we tend to be a bit more zealous in attempting to persuade others to our point of view. More on this latter.
Secondly, it appears that some of my comments in the other thread have not been taken as intended.
I am not one of the so called "left lane vigilantes".
I do only use the left lane when I have a legitimate reason to be there.
If I see another car coming up fast on the left, I will usually wait for them to pass before I enter the left lane.
I will not however, speed just because I need to use the left lane for passing or an exit.
In heavy traffic, I wait as long as is practical to enter the left lane. I have found that if I wait until I am near the exit, I am forced to drive in an unacceptably aggressive manner to get into the left lane. So, I may enter the left lane as much as 3 miles back in order to safely change lanes.
On regular streets, be it city or rural, is where I can end up with a number of cars behind me. One specific 2 lane city street has a 25MPH speed limit that is strictly enforced.
I refuse to risk a ticket just so some fool can drive down this street at 50. (and they do!)
The street is lined with houses, day care centers and schools, so the low speed limit is justified.
Yes, as a reformed traffic scofflaw, I am fully for zero tolerance traffic law enforcement.
If I am in front of you, and I speed up so that you can speed, am I not aiding and abetting your criminal behavior?
If you ride my bumper, or flash your lights at me when I do not have a safe opportunity to change lanes, are you not trying to coerce me into breaking the law?
I find it interesting that many people who post here are in favor of law and order, so long as they are allowed to break the laws they want to.
What would our society be like if the police enforced other laws as loosely as traffic laws are enforced?
The robber only took $500?
I'm sorry, we don't investigate a robbery unless they take at least $1000!
The crime took place during rush hour?
Sorry, we only enforce that law during off peak hours.
Why do we accept and demand loose enforcement of our traffic laws?
Are traffic laws somehow less important than other laws?
Further, if you don't demand that you yourself follow the laws that pertain to your activities, what right do you have asking others to be held accountable for the laws they break?
Yes, it may be your right to break the law. But, is is your responsibility in exchange for that right to obey the law.
Chas