Community archive
that not everyone in the us is a gun loving homicidal maniac.
I say let them have the shoot first law.
it will remove the mentally and physically incometent from the gene pool, increasing the average iq in the us to 99
by gadgetgirl
surely you jest, Jaqui?
]:)
GG
by jaqui
we both know hitting 60 on average would be a 15 point improvement. ;)
when the world average is 98...
by gadgetgirl
I won't tell them if you don't....!! :D
(147, btw!)
]:)
GG
by dr dij
by jck
You realize...research shows Canada is a point lower than the USA. ;)
http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/article_intelligence/t4.asp
hehehe...read it and weep...canuck ;)
by jck
is that in cm or mm? hahaha :D
I've tested from 130s to 180s depending on which test I took and what not.
even took an online one the other day for grins and got 151.
I don't put a lot of faith in IQ tests. I've seen guys with "below average" IQ scores who could do more with broken-down cars than the most factory-trained mechanics.
by gadgetgirl
on what the Canadian was doing with his Footsie at the time......
:p
GG
by m_a_r_k
by jdclyde
have the scent of blood and are just waiting for more scraps to fall off the table.
Bad Jaqui, Bad! (whack on the nose with a rolled up newspaper) ;)
by puppybreath
Your logic escapes me.
Assuming that:
1) Intelligent people (higher IQs) know the difference between right and wrong.
2)They would not use deadly force unless absolutely necessary
Wouldn't that indicate that the real danger would be from mentally and physically incompetent people owning hand guns?
And if the mentally and physically incompetent are the ones with the guns and they start shooting the people with higher IQs, wouldn't the IQ rate go down?
Or are you indicating that anyone with a higher IQ should blast away at less intelligent people to improve our standings in the world IQ rankings?
by jdclyde
You are assuming that all criminals are of low IQ's? There are MANY examples through out history of what is refered to as the "evil genius".
Intellect is not restricted to "good" people.
As for the last point, no. You are not allowed to shoot the Candians. :D
by puppybreath
No, I'm not assuming that all criminals are of low IQs. Besides, this post wasn't referring to crime or criminals but a law that supposedly allows you to protect yourself from danger.
What I AM assuming is that people with high IQ's would think before reacting so may not shoot where a person with a lower IQ may shoot first and then decide if it was a good idea.
If I can't shoot Canadians, can I still hit them on the nose with a rolled up newspaper?
by jaqui
by apotheon
by jdclyde
did you REALLY expect it to be a valid, unbiased source that would explain the pros and cons of the new law?
Just another case where the criminals had more rights than the victoms.
I say it is long over due and if someone is going to be a scumbag and attack someone they WILL get what they deserve.
Quit making excuses for criminals.
Quit protecting criminals.
Quit persecuting the victoms.
by jaqui
with both the law and my own prefference:
Quit making excuses for criminals.
Quit protecting criminals.
Quit persecuting the victoms.
~ typo fix - victims ~
kill em all, let the gods sort them out.
by jdclyde
by jdclyde
And raise the average IQ in the USA to 100+ :-)
The Brady organization, who sponsors that web site, are known to be rabid anti-gun nuts who want to impose their fear of guns on everyone, and have trouble with the 2nd Amendment, even though it is part of the Bill of Rights that guarantees our Civil Liberties. The Brady organization does not seem to understand that if they do not like guns, they do not have to own any.
by jdclyde
are big on civil liberties, until it comes to guns. That is one they would take away in a heart beat if the could.
Pick and choose which rights you like and outlaw the rest.
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Sort by Trending