General discussion
Thread display: Collapse - |
All Comments
Start or search
Create a new discussion
If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.
What's good and what is right?
Everyone blame/crucify/make verdicts on someone or something.
The problem is not about "what is good" and "what is right" to do, but WHO is the one who judges these two things.
I ask myself this question because in a lot of cases, what seams right for some, is the total oposit for others. And this is the whole story about. As long as we'll not be able to UNDERSTAND the others, we will never be able to move over this isue.
I am not talking here about the americans or the arabs, the black people or the white or the red or, name you whatever "color" people may have (as for myself I don't give a dime for such of things, we are all human beings).
The history shows us that without a strong character and a high degree of conscience of each of one of the "comunity", nothing can end in "peace".
I remember a "scene" where an english general told to his major to stop killing american people, innocent people, because after the war, these people will be their trading partners. I also remember another "scene" when a great roman general was killed by the acolits because he wanted too much to make peace with the enemy and save the empire. I might ask, who's right and who's wrong? Someone who wanted to spare lifes thinking that he'll be reach in short time after the war, or the general that wanted the peace to keep the empire, and in the same time, to have other nations in slavery? And I can give you a lot more examples about how simple "acting" in a way or another can be seen as good or bad, depending on "what/which side of the barricade" you are.
That does not mean that you don't have to act at all!! In contrary, what I say is to act, but before acting, have as much data as you can about the facts, make a decision and act in total "knowledge" of what will be AFTER your acting.
Nowadays, in the day life, in IT for example, when someone brakes your security on your network, you want him and hunt him down, looking for making that person "disapear from site". What is the difference between you and the others you blame then? (I mean, in the end, someone hurts, and maybe will look for revenge)
As someone says very well, this is human nature, self defence and revenge, the Thalion law ("an eye for an eye") is still here, deep down into us, and you can't hide or escape to it. But you can always refrain it "making surface", blowing away your "happy" life.
So, to end here, (not a great and coherent thread though), I would like to know your oppinion about this WHO.