TIOBE Index for March 2026: SQL and R Swap Spots as Jansen Defends Search-Based Rankings

TIOBE Index for March 2026: SQL and R Swap Spots as Jansen Defends Search-Based Rankings

TIOBE Index for March 2026: SQL and R Swap Spots as Jansen Defends Search-Based Rankings

Source: Rawpixel/Envato

March 2026 TIOBE Index stays largely steady, with SQL and R swapping spots, as Paul Jansen explains why the index still relies on search engine hits.

Written By
Liz Ticong
Liz Ticong
Mar 10, 2026

March doesn’t bring a dramatic reshuffle at the top of the TIOBE Index, but it does deliver a small twist in the lower tier: SQL and R trade places in the top 10. With the rankings mostly steady otherwise, TIOBE CEO Paul Jansen uses this month to answer a question he says keeps coming up: why the index still relies on search engine data in the age of LLMs.

The TIOBE Programming Community Index tracks programming language popularity using search engine activity.

Historical trends trace the popularity of programming languages over decades. Image: TIOBE Software.

The leader stays the same, and second place looks even sturdier

Python remains in first at 21.25%, still comfortably ahead of the pack even after a month-to-month dip. C strengthens its hold on second at 11.55%, continuing to separate itself from the tight cluster behind it.

That chase group keeps the same order: C++ at 8.18%, Java at 7.99%, and C# at 6.36%. The spacing shifts slightly, but not enough to change the hierarchy or the storyline: Python is still in its own category, and C is the clearest “best of the rest.”

The middle holds, while SQL and R swap positions

JavaScript stays sixth at 3.45%, and Visual Basic remains seventh at 2.50%. These positions continue to be the least volatile part of the table, with changes too small to trigger movement.

The notable change happens lower down: SQL sits eighth at 2.00%, while R slips to ninth at 1.88%, reversing their order from February. Delphi/Object Pascal holds tenth at 1.80%, keeping a strong foothold in the bottom slot.

Why search engines still matter, even with LLMs everywhere

Advertisement

Jansen’s response to the “why not ask an LLM?” question is straightforward: the index is measuring how much material exists on the public internet for each programming language, and search engines are still the most direct way to estimate that footprint.

LLMs don’t solve that problem, he argues, because they ultimately draw from the same web pages. In practice, swapping search engine signals for an LLM’s opinion would be less a new measurement and more a blurred reflection of the same underlying sources.

A stable table, a timely warning

March’s stability still carries a signal, because it shows where the index is most sensitive. The top of the table has wide gaps, so small month-to-month changes don’t alter the order. The bottom of the top 10 is the opposite. The percentages are tightly clustered, which means modest swings in online visibility can flip positions.

That’s why SQL and R trading places is meaningful — not as a dramatic trend shift, but as evidence that competition is tight and small changes in public footprint can change the ranking.

Microsoft’s latest Windows 11 preview fixes the File Explorer white flash that has been irritating users.

Liz Ticong

Liz Ticong is a technology writer specializing in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, software reviews, and emerging business technologies. With more than a decade of professional writing experience and over five years contributing technology content for TechnologyAdvice, she helps readers understand complex technologies and evaluate the tools that best fit their needs. Liz has extensive experience researching, testing, and analyzing software platforms, AI tools, and technology solutions. Her work includes in-depth software reviews, buyer’s guides, product comparisons, and technology news coverage designed to help businesses make informed purchasing and implementation decisions. She regularly evaluates AI applications, automation tools, cybersecurity solutions, and business software, providing practical insights based on hands-on testing and research. In addition to her work with TechnologyAdvice, Liz has contributed technology content to leading industry publications, including eWeek and TechRepublic. Her background in technical writing and software analysis enables her to translate complex technical concepts into clear, actionable guidance for both business and technology audiences. Liz holds a bachelor's degree in Broadcast Communication from the Polytechnic University of the Philippines and continues to expand her expertise through ongoing education in artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. Through her writing, she helps readers navigate a rapidly evolving technology landscape with practical, research-driven insights and real-world product analysis.