General discussion


Abuse of copyright to solicit search engine popularity

By quickegreets ·
Latest fraud scam rapidly growing globally

This scam is not new but it is new to the global public and defrauding search engines to rank sites and income illegally.

There needs to be some form of global over seer to monitor copyright abuse. Endless site managers in the case of blogs dating agencies and similar, where basic profiles are made are then happily allowing this repeat persistent abuse by countless numbers of their customers take place persistently without any question.

They know full well at the end of the day they can simply remove the material and get away scot free from being penalised.

Why would they allow this so much you think, well mean while it certainly gets them endless extra publicity and procures fraudulent search engine links and ranking by allowing this persistent use of popular copyright material to continue, it certainly boosts web site popularity no end and increases the site owners and domain or host managers income multiple fold, sadly at the cost and loss of the genuine authors.

Some of these unnamed site owners I now have to email copyright notices too literally around the clock, there needs to be a very heavy fixed penalty for any site owner as domain manager too, reaching more than say ten notices sent to them in any one month and total permanent final site closure if this repeats more than three times in all in say a year, with extremely heavy penalties enforced on both site owners host and domain managers alike.

The domain and host masters put together a TOS (terms of service) as do some major site owners and endless countless customers do not even know they exist nor that they are meant to legally follow and adhere to any set form of guidelines or law?

I?ve been sending copyright notices out since 1986 and you would not believe how many poetry forum owners reply by saying it?s a public forum our members can post what they like. I have had four such replies in the last four weeks alone.

There is no such thing as a public poetry forum where copyright material is freely allowed to be blatantly abused. No one on any web site is allowed to take or display copyright material there is no law to say or legally grant any different in any country found across the globe.

This clearly reflects how many host and domain managers miserably fail to reflect to their customers the stipulations expected and the cans and cants of their TOS and the law itself.

To knowingly allow endless numbers of customers to display copyright material and simply remove it at the end of the day as requested is abuse of the law, all is done simply to solicit profit and gain via search engine popularity from extremely popular material.

When a host or domain manager is forced to deal with copyright abuse this MUST see immediate full closure of the offending blog or profile and not merely removal of the material.

In extreme cases where more than one notice is issued to a web site in one go this should see the immediate closure of that web site permanently.

When a notice of copyright has finally been complied with there should also be a link to a governing authority that then allows us to then submit this to one global overseer which alerts all other search engines and instructs final permanent global removal of that site from all global search engines. (Say when a set fixed number of cases of copyright abuse are reached).

As also with complaints about pornographic material etc too the same should apply globally.

This way the internet could perhaps be a far happier place for one and all.

I?ve a vast list of offenders collated since 1986. I?m not going to name and shame, but endless times I?m sorely tempted to post this on my web sites.

You?d be surprised who the main knowing offenders of this actually are.

The number of links reported clearly reflects the very real truth in what I say here as a very evident truth and actual reality.

Any global major Internet players and authority please give thought to this issue as it is a very real and serious evidential truth.

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

Give up.

by TonytheTiger In reply to Abuse of copyright to sol ...

the whole patent/copyright thing is a lumbering dinosaur... headed for certain extinction.

Collapse -

Deliberate Abuse by lawyer of dying terminally ill mans works

by quickegreets In reply to Abuse of copyright to sol ...

Chillingeffects criminal solicitor as Google and Harvard University deliberately abuse dying terminally ill mans works

Google stitch up and deliberately knowingly abuse the copyright laws and they have hired a solicitor called Wendy Seltzer who runs a web site called chilingeffects to do this

Between the two of them they make each other sites very good to falsify Google???s own search engine rankings regarding blogspot and chillingeffects

Google run and own the criminal blogspot site which is laced and riddled with countless cases of copyright abuse by folk who could not give a damn about the law or about the fact that copyright abuse can land themselves in prison for two years as also the host master as from 2006/2007 as with new changes in Europe UK as USA

Their staff at Google have ignored countless billions of notices sent to them across the globe week after week making sure they get maximum use of any ones illegally placed material it???s only the really determined folk who will ever get their material removed from blogspot

You need to understand Google are the largest online community in the world yet despite the sheer numbers of staff working for them it deliberately takes weeks if not months to chase up any single notice of copyright where as myspace and facebook take just 24 hours in most cases

What makes matters worse again is that the ???Senators Governors USA President as Police???, do not give a damn and they actively encourage and allow this abuse to persist so folk are buying copyright from the USA Government that will not carry any weight concerning the fraud abuse of Google and the criminal solicitor who runs chillingeffects. If we look at the legal process and the cases against Google and the cash this has brought to the legal as justice system, there is no wonder it???s encouraged and allowed by USA government

Google and chillingeffects do this solely to pat one another backs Google remove someone???s material and chillingeffects then advertise the url to Google's blogspot and use the material illegally to gain search engine rankings

Chillingeffects is a site about the law and is meant to say this is how you do it; this is how you use the law, and any such a site of course would not wish to abuse the law yet further, but then again if the site owner is to publish sympathy poems birthday poems love poems films movies books then this will bring her search engine rankings and popularity through links that will take her site through the roof

She actually does need the owner???s signed granted consent to use this material but what the heck she???s a solicitor and she will make up a story about the law apparently having a loophole that allows her to abuse people???s material to make her filthy rich

She does in fact need to have signed consent to use anyone???s material on her site and even needs the authors signed consent to use or display the copyright notice

Chilingeffects a terrifying apt name for her criminal acts yes okay yes, but you???ve heard absolutely nothing yet?

I am terminally ill with COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) which means my lungs are gone and this will gradually get worse on top of this I have either Multiple Sclerosis and am possibly suffering strokes too

My poems are on an online greeting card site and this woman has been made absolutely unquestionably aware of this, as have her host masters too, they are Harvard the University

Now you would not think that Harvard would not ignore something as bad as this but yes they are and absolutely without a doubt they are as guilty as Wendy Seltzer as of Google of abusing the law to make the already filthy rich, yet that much richer again

The daily untold anguish and suffering brought on by her attitude and sheer deliberate ignorance as the work load created too as Google and their criminal host masters Harvard University need immediate legal action and closure in her sites as Harvard as host master cases

And as for Google they need a legal case to put them rightly in their place and their director needs to stand in court facing criminal charges as do the USA Senators Governors and President for allowing this to persist

This below is what the law says on such a matter, and it is these points being abused by the filthy rich directors at Google as the criminal thief solicitor Wendy Seltzer and Harvard directors alike, why, because they cannot spend the cash they have already amounted in life and need yet more and no other reason or purpose what so ever

Why else would a solicitor wish to argue and hassle and antagonise a terminally ill dying man and be absolutely determined that she was going to use as abuse his works as his life too, this is not for law or the principle it is to end that Man???s life and be branded the most ignorant filthy rich thief in the world

Chillingeffects is the ideal name for this woman???s criminal riddled with crime and abuse of the law web site, if I die before this is resolved I will haunt every day of her life throughout and no exorcist will even shift me

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of ???fair use.??? The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.

Related Discussions

Related Forums