http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19539748/
It’s about how camera’s in London helped capture the latest terrorists and if citizens of the United States would accept this type of surveillance.
My feelings.
1). If your on those camera’s, your in public. What freaken privacy.
2). Proven track record, don’t try.
3). Quote from the article.
[i]There will always be a healthy dynamic tension between freedom and safety, but we would be well [b]advised to recognize that the ultimate loss of freedom is the death of innocents.[/b][/i]
In other words, your cherished freedom cost someone their life which means they lost all their freedoms, Who here has the guts to tell me that their privacy is more important. come on people do tell.. In the context of this specific article, camera’s in the public. Is your precious privacy so important that you would have someone lose all their freedoms? Their life? Are you so much more important then they are?
And yes, it is as simple as that.
Dan
