General discussion

Locked

at what point does outsourcing make sense?

By rob.sakamano ·
How many users does it take to make outsourcing basic IT functions a sensible option? 200? 500? outsource if they are spread out over geographical locations? with all the remote mgmt tools, how important is it to be at the end user's system?

i'm talking about outsourcing, NOT off-shoring.

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

19 total posts (Page 1 of 2)   01 | 02   Next
| Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

No fixed ratio

by stress junkie In reply to at what point does outsou ...

I think that this depends on the business. The specific requirements the business has of the IT support staff is probably the main measure. For example, if the business has a lot of generic servers and a well behaved end user community then you can probably outsource. If the business has a lot of highly customized applications or develops their own applications in house then they probably should have IT direct employees that know the history of each environment, why decisions were made, and other specific knowledge of the business computing environment.

As far as size goes I would say that, if anything, larger businesses would fare better to have direct employees in their IT staff. Very small businesses that are tight on IT budgets have the greatest need for outsourcing. In fact, that's exactly what I do. I'm self employed and my clients are very very small businesses. I provide a few hours a month of scheduled support and then add whatever time is required for special projects like setting up computers. This way my customers don't pay for idle IT staff, training, sick time, SSN contributions, etc. They only pay for exactly the number of hours of support that they need.

Collapse -

Who you calling idle then ?

by Tony Hopkinson In reply to No fixed ratio
Collapse -

Depends on how much pain you can take!

by nsmurali In reply to at what point does outsou ...

I can speak from my experience in the field of medical practice.
Outsourcing to cut down front office staff is a dumb idea. You may save a few thousand dollars but to have a faceles voice interact with your critially ill paients or even healthy customers -No way. Outsourcing to cut out the back office staff is not a bright idea either. If you have highly experienced staff who know their job, pay them a few thousand more. You will sleep well at night. Outsourcing billing and bill collections - NOT a bright idea. A ticked off customer can be a major pain in the posterior. In summary outsourcing mission critial operations, particularly in small practices will not work. In fact in my office, for over 10 years I have been sendin g my employees on the best quality cruises to keep them happy, loyal and to boost their morale . I see fabulous returns on such investment. However if you cannot find competent local help for back office functions contact a decent company with expertise in billing and tracking to get the job done. They seem to do a good job.
In the medical field outsourcing may work for major elective surgical procedures like CABG, elective heart surgery, most elective orthopedic surgery, elective eye surgery and for procedures costing more than $20000 in the USA. Be prepared to forego the favorite American pasttime-the right to call your trial lawuer if things do not go your way!
Outsourcing reading of X-rays is a dumb idea. It only leads to law suits if the doctor reading the X-ray cannot interact intelligently with the doctor ordering the X-rays. This is particularly true for doctor's offices and small community hospitals with reliable backup radiologists. Think of a guy with a stroke waiting for thrombolytic therapy...!
In summary, outsourcing medical operations may not produce the desired outcomes.

Collapse -

You May Not Even Get Waht You Pay For

by JohnnySacks In reply to Depends on how much pain ...

Hiring contractors or full time employees is a pain, weed through hundreds of resumes knowing every 10 contractors you hire, only three will be worth their weight in peach pits. At least a direct hire may be more likely to have more loyalty.

I've seen the contracting side of IT support, at first you get the cream of the crop, everything goes well. Most likely, the contractor is trying to grow his business and the cream of the crop are a critical necessity for the new contracts. Time to start bringing in and training the replacements, next thing you know, all the initial knowledgeable people that you had confidence in are no longer around and the new people are always calling them to solve problems.

Collapse -

For small businesses

by Tony Hopkinson In reply to at what point does outsou ...

straight away.
Large ones never in theory, in practice round about when you work out that the next share dividend will go negative.

It's another one of these depersonalising arguments, your staff are much more than their technicals skills and the service that provides the bulk of the original business case to employ them.

Ask yourself these questions about whatever you are going to outsource.

How long could live without the function.

If the staff performing it left en masse, how long and how much would it cost replace them.

How much of what you want to outsource is written down, so any 'fool' could do it.

If you sell off the staff that do it now, how much would it cost to get them back.

How long past year end will you need the service that you are considering outsourcing.

Tongue in cheek question that last one. Why are you considering outsourcing ? What is the motive,

If it's just cost savings then find another employer, they've already gone bust, the accountants just haven't caught up with them yet.

You grow businesses by increasing revenue, not decreasing costs. If you aren't growing, you are dieing.

Collapse -

well, it's complicated

by rob.sakamano In reply to For small businesses

Of course it usually is. I just started at a company and we have multiple subsidiaries. IT is supported by one of the subs, which has grown to a point where they need to split off on their own. they make up about 70% of the population and 99% of the IT. we're looking at outsourcing vs. hiring vs. option 3, which could be anything in between.
Hard part is there are a lot of unknowns, largely because i've only been here 4 days.
still navigating thru documents, learning politics, and ultimately deciding the IT direction of about 300-400 users, with steady growth in the next 1-5 years.
apps range from standard IT, to SAP.

Collapse -

It's not about the headcount...

by sjoconnor3 In reply to at what point does outsou ...

Before you ask the question "at what point does outsourcing make sense", I think you have to look to see what your organic assets are, and what your IT department?s core competencies are.

Example: If you as a business owner want to bring in a new ERP, Supply Chain, CRM software like SAP on board I bet you don't have organic SAP experts within your IT staff. At that point, you outsource what you need, because you probably could not afford a whole staff of SAP experts that were permanent employees.

Another thing to ask yourself is what you can outsource that will free up your IT staffs time to work on other more important projects...

An area that companies completely overlook is finding a hardware vendor that can also take over the Imaging of your PC's (Get standards in place), to make the PC's plug and play. The extra $25 for the PC to be imaged is probably less than the time it will take away from your IT staff for those projects they are late on. Have your vendor assemble and test your servers, install windows server, and even your application, and the patches you want. Time is money, how much time does your staff waste on menial tasks??

My point is to use outsourcing to streamline your IT departments, and avoid wasted time.

If a job is just time intensive and not very skill based, out-source IT.

Got a large PC rollout? Need Extra Bodies to put PC's and new monitors on a desk, and put the old one on a pallet for disposal? Outsource... Think of outsourcing as TEMPORARY LABOR...

If a temp is what is needed, Outsource...

Need a programmer for 90 days to 6 months? Outsource... Yes he will cost a little more an hour than a full time employee, but if you only need him for 6 months, the cost of benefits, training, and other hidden costs will quickly eat up the savings you thought you were going to get (what are you going to do, hire and fire people ever few months?)... Plus if you need the same programmer a year later for 90 days more, via outsourcing, he'll be happy to work for you again... If you hired him and fired him after 6-months he'll probably tell you to take a hike...

All companies outsource something? Don?t believe me? Who provides your electricity, water, sewer service, telephone service, Air Conditioning & Heating service, etc?? Unless you are an electrical company I bet you don?t have organic electricians?

Collapse -

Agreed. Think why people do business with you.

by jaymwells In reply to It's not about the headco ...

Think about what functions make your firm different and attractive to customers, partners, and employees. If it's not one of those functions, then think about outsourcing it ... especially if you're a small business.

For example, nobody does business with you because you can send and receive emails. They may refuse to do business with you if you can't; so make sure your email is not subject to sick days or staff depaprtures. A 2 person IT staff can be gone in a matter of hours, and then you're stuck.

Redeploy those 2 people to efforts that make your company unique and that add serious value. Maybe website creation or your customized CRM, ERP apps...

Collapse -

I agree about those people who don't share knowledge or fail to document

by Why Me Worry? In reply to Agreed. Think why people ...

because they have this false sense of job security in thinking that since they are the only ones who know this, they will never be out of the job. Nobody is irreplaceable and people with such naive thinking will learn that the hard way. Yes, it will be a bit of a task for the new person to document everything and figure things out, but it is not impossible. Also, many current IT employees don't document and share what they know out of spite in thinking that if push comes to shove if their jobs are threatened or they ask for a raise, they have the company by the "balls" because nobody else knows what they know. People like that will quickly get a rude awakening when they realize that their job can be done by a consultant or someone working out of Bangalore, India.

Collapse -

its not how big, but what function...

by JAB42 In reply to at what point does outsou ...

Any company size can benefit from outsourcing some componant of IT. Small companies can outsource the entire function and big companies can outsource pieces (helpdesk for standard apps). In between, it depends on your IT staff's expertise and interests. At our shop, we work with a couple of outsource companies for various things. One handles our scanning equipment and integration, one handles cabling/paging/security, one handles the barcode printing process, one handles complicated network changes.

The key is finding companies that (typically) sell stuff, but have realized that there is value to be added to that process. Everyone says that they offer services, so you have to be careful about what they can actually deliver. Even the ones that we outsource to, sometimes that recommend and sell something that they have no experience integrating and end up telling their customers to RTFM or will call tech support for you.

It is all about what you want your direct staff focusing on. There is only one area that can't be effectively outsourced: develope detailed knowledge of both the business and technology and an ability to make technical decisions that help the company. If you can hire someone to do all that, they will be at your place enough that they might was well be an employee.

Back to IT Employment Forum
19 total posts (Page 1 of 2)   01 | 02   Next

Related Discussions

Related Forums