General discussion

Locked

Before Genesis

By mylestone26 ·
Tags: Off Topic
blog root

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

1 total post (Page 1 of 1)  
| Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

Creation Knowledge Evolution

by mylestone26 In reply to Before Genesis

 
<p class="MsoNormal">The capacity for learning, understanding and assimilating knowledge has grown over the eons along with the progressive development of animal life forms. Each multi-celled animal, people included, develop from a single cell so that as our brains develop they are void of any knowledge except for the instincts and behavioral characteristics inherited through DNA instructions embedded within each cell. Except for inherited instincts and behavioral characteristics, learning is achieved through experiences sensed by the faculties with which the animal is equipped. While more highly developed animals can pass on learned experiences, it stands that all knowledge has and is continuing to be derived in that manner. Learning involves the growth of knowledge by studying things that exist, the behavior of things that exist, or knowledge of the behavior of things that exist, whether the learning was done by declared Scientists, Physicists, Medical Researchers, or by ordinary things with a brain, even including lower class animals. In response to what is learned, concepts and theories have been developed by which to convey what has been learned.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Understandably, the process of learning by observing behavior reveals only what is seen and recognized in the process so that initial observations may have missed or mistook some behavior thereby producing incomplete or defective knowledge that has adversely affected subsequent research work. (Case in point, the concept of the earth centered Universe of Aristotle.) That matter was addressed explicitly in a recent book entitled “<i>The Road To Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe</i>” (Knopf Random House, 2005, ISBN 067945443 written by Roger Penrose, the current authority on modern physics. In that publication, author Penrose laments the lack of understanding, in fact our ignorance, about the laws of the Universe where upon he concludes: “<i>Perhaps what we mainly need is some subtle change in perspective --- something that we all have missed</i>.” So it is with the invisible but well proven force called gravitation that is fundamental to the development of a full understanding of physics and which is in turn fundamental to understanding the origin and behavior of the Universe. Part of the problem stems from the fact that the force of gravitation has no physical component so is discernible only through observation of the reaction it produces on objects that have a physical presence such as an apple falling from a tree. Extensive research work on the force called gravitation was done by people like Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), and Henry Cavendish (1731-1810). </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Galileo, Newton and Cavendish discovered that the force of gravitation acts from the vector center or core center of the mass of each assembly where the strength of the force is at a ratio of one unit of strength for each elemental particle of mass involved in the assembly. Unfortunately, unable to identify the energy that powers the force of gravitation,<span>  </span>the force of gravitation was attributed to “an affinity or attraction” that existed as a natural behavior. Subsequent attempts to identify an energy source have failed and the initial explanation of Newton remains even though it is known that the terms affinity and attraction defines the nature of the behavior of the force of gravitation, not the source of the power that produces the force.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">A second serious misconception was introduced through use of the term “mass” which is a conceived relative, not a definitive, term. Through the efforts of those researchers, it was discovered that the strength of the force of gravitation produced by an object changes when the number of elemental particles, which is another way of saying the quantity of matter, involved in making the object changes with that precise direct proportion ratio remaining regardless of all other factors. It must be recognized that a real error is introduced if the relative term “mass” is used in place of the definitive term “number of elemental particles.” The relationship between the strength of the force of gravitation and the number of elemental particles, or amount of matter, remains constant under all circumstances even if the object is made to travel at the speed of light or to some remote place in space. The research of Newton showed that the strength of the force of gravitation diminishes inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the core center of each assembly or body of matter. It is that knowledge that explains why the rate of acceleration of freely falling objects at points such as at the earth’s surface, are the same regardless of the size or density of the material of which made but increases as the distance from the core center diminishes.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">A third serious misconception was introduced as a consequence of not recognizing initially that there is an energy that produces the force of gravitation (that currently is attributed to something called an affinity or an attraction) and that it is a part of, one of the elemental components of, all atoms and so is then a component of the mass of an object. In other words, an atom of gold is made of 79 protons, 79 neutrons, 79 electrons plus a quantity of the energy that produces the force of gravitation, which quantity is relative to the number of elemental particles used in making the 79 electron, 79 proton, and 79 neutron components. If that point were not true, then the assembly known as a gold atom would not remain a stable gold atom. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Prior to publication and acceptance of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, a recognized basic law of Physics maintained that the accomplishment of work requires the application and expenditure of energy. However, the Einstein theory still fails to identify a provable gravitation power source so fails to recognize an energy cause for the force of gravitation, the matter remains knowledge that has been missed. In this instance the missed knowledge is being concealed and hidden by the community of scientists and educators who control belief by excluding from consideration any cause other than the meaningless affinity or attraction hypothesis or now the equally meaningless relativity theory. The irony is that the community of theologians contributes to the concealment of this knowledge by hiding behind their faith professed as the belief that all things, with gravitation included, are the work of God where further explanation is not necessary. The results in both cases are the same. Knowledge that not only explains the fundamentals of physics but which explains how the Universe was assembled and how it and all things are sustained, has been missed. It is fundamental to the existence of the Universe.</p>
<p class="MsoBodyTextIndent">The dilemma over the missed knowledge concerning the source of the energy that powers the force of gravitation begins to be resolved when it is acknowledged that the force of gravitation that contains no physical component, is able to penetrate any physical thing to which not attached, is real, it exists. The force of gravitation acts from the core center of each assembly of matter whether the assembly is a proton or the sun in a solar system, to exert physical force upon the elemental components to which attached. The energy that powers the force of gravitation is an elementary component of every atom of matter just as are electrons, protons and neutrons. It is fundamental to all things in the Universe. Consider that without the existence of the force of gravitation, the first elemental particles involved in making matter could not have been assembled but would have vanished into the nothingness that then existed. There would have been no neutrons, no protons, no atoms, no galaxies, no solar systems and no earth. More importantly from the standpoint of visualizing the mechanism of gravitation, as the number of elemental particles increased then the magnitude of the strength of the gravitation force producing energy acting from the core center of the matter being assembled, would have increased in proportion as demonstrated by Newton, which proves that the source of the energy that powers the force of gravitation is the core center of the Universe.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The existence of a core centered gravitational attraction system is more clearly discernible by tracking its process beginning with a single atom on our moon. Recall that the atom is an assembly of electrons, protons, neutrons and a force (gravitation) acting from the core center of the assembly to bind those components to make the atom. That atom as an assembly is then in turn pulled by the force of gravitation acting from the core center of the moon where the strength of that force is in direct proportion to the number of elemental subatomic particles of which the moon is made. Then recognize that the elemental particles of which the moon is made are in turn pulled by the force of gravitation acting from the core center of the earth, where the strength of the force is in direct proportion to the number of the subatomic elemental particles of which the earth is made which, as an assembly seen from the sun, includes the moon. Then recognize that the elemental particles of which the earth assembly is made are in turn pulled by the force of gravitation acting from the core center of the sun where the strength of the force is in direct proportion to the number of subatomic elemental particles of which the sun assembly is made, which includes the sun itself as well as the elemental particles involved in making all of the planet assemblies of the solar system. Then follow the trail of the core centered gravitational attraction system through the galaxies and constellations to the center of the Universe. Recognize that the strength of force of gravitation at the core centers of the galaxy assemblies, the constellation assemblies, and the center of the Universe, increases as the mass of elemental particles increases so that at the center of the Universe the strength would be enormous. That is, sufficient to supply all of the needs of the entire Universe. Then recognize that the strength of the force of gravitation at the core center of the Universe would have been relatively small at the time the components of the first atom were made and assembled and would have grown in magnitude as new elemental particles were produced. Through that analogy it becomes evident that the energy that produces the force of gravitation is supplied by/from the core center of the Universe which therefore is the source of all things, including the energy that powers all things, now existing in the Universe. The preceding explanation seems to be self-evident and already well proven. It is even in concert with the big bang theory. At least there is no replicable proof that the explanation provided is not valid.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The knowledge missed by denying the existence of a source of the energy that produces the force of gravitation, is only the tip of the iceberg. Consider the knowledge that forms the basis for Newton’s Law of Gravitation which states in part that any two bodies attract each other. Again, use of the term “attract” conceals the fact that there is a two way web of interaction between all bodies by which the force of gravitation is applied. That attraction is a real thing even though it has no physical component capable of detection by the senses with which we are endowed. Consider that the ocean tides on earth are caused by the force of gravitation acting from the center of the moon physically pulling the elemental components of which the atoms and molecules of the earth’s ocean water are made. Then consider that the moon is maintained in earth orbit because of the earth’s force of gravitation is physically pulling to keep the moon from flying off into space. What greater proof can there be that the force of gravitation is a real thing. The same real thing that is an elementary component of every atom. Sure the strength of that force diminishes rapidly with distance but its reach is infinite. Could it be that the interconnecting web that exists between all bodies (every body) might be the vehicle by which light/heat photons are carried? After all, the force of gravitation has been determined to act at the speed of light. Could the web of gravitational forces provide the vehicle for electromagnetic wave transmission? Are photons of light and heat, remnants of the web structure that had interconnected the core center of an atom and an orbiting electron? Is the force that causes the flow of electrons in an electrical circuit in fact produced by the force of gravitation interconnection between proton assemblies and electrons? Is the force of an atomic explosion caused by the release of the energy that had produced the force of gravitation that had held the atoms of which the bomb material was made, and the elemental components of those atoms, together?<span>  </span>If the force of gravitation that pulls the ocean tides, or that holds solar systems in orbit in a galaxy, is real with an acknowledged causing energy, why not? And further still, why not acknowledge that, since the force of gravitation interconnecting all bodies has been at work for the 12 billion years since the beginning of time, the supply of the energy that produces the force of gravitation is eternal?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The mystery is not what causes the force of gravitation but how our eyes can remain closed to the knowledge that explains the mysteries of the forces fundamental to the creation of the Universe.</p>

Back to After Hours Forum
1 total post (Page 1 of 1)  

Related Discussions

Related Forums