General discussion

  • Creator
  • #2181928

    Better Business Blogging


    by Veronica Combs ·

    blog root

All Comments

  • Author
    • #3170620

      Likable fools or competent jerks?

      by Veronica Combs ·

      In reply to Better Business Blogging

      I borrowed a copy of June’s Harvard Business Review to read about
      social networks at work. A study of four businesses showed that there
      are four main types of people in these networks:

      Competent jerks
      Incompetent jerks 
      Likable fools
      Friendly stars

      The article includes one of those ever present quad diagrams (a
      business article/theory is not complete without one) with competency on
      the vertical axis and likablity on the horizontal axis. Curiously (or
      mabye not), in the illustration, the figures in three of the quadrants
      are men, the only woman is in the friendly star quadrant.

      The main conclusion of the study is that people will pick likable fools
      over competent jerks when they’re choosing someone to work with.
      Everyone says that they value skill over personality, but their actions belie that statement.
      It’s actually a really interesting article with specific advice on how
      to get the most out of stars and competent jerks and how to work with
      the bias of working with friendly people over competent people. Use the
      friendly people as bridges between departments was one good suggestion.

      I know I thought of a couple competent jerks that I have trouble
      working with as I read the article. One reason the researchers found
      that co-workers avoid these people is that the jerks might react in a
      condescending way to questions or use their knowledge to humiliate the
      questioner. I find that I push myself to work with some jerks because I
      value their knowledge and want to benefit from it. It is extra work,
      though, no doubt, but it does help me develop a thick skin.

      • #3172293

        Likable fools or competent jerks?

        by beth blakely ·

        In reply to Likable fools or competent jerks?

        Very interesting. Perhaps you could share some of the tactics you use to make working with “jerks” less painful? Have you developed ways to respond to condescension that have changed the “jerk’s” behavior in any way? Have you found that as you assert yourself with these “jerks” they become less abrasive?

    • #3172134

      Carrots not bullets

      by Veronica Combs ·

      In reply to Better Business Blogging

      One colleague’s contribution to an e-mail debate about whether to use
      carrots or bullets on the redesign of a directory page:

      Carrots are healthy in a way that bullets are not.

    • #3058847

      The dreaded “I was told”

      by Veronica Combs ·

      In reply to Better Business Blogging

      When i’m in a meeting and someone says, “I was told…..” I cringe.
      This is always a bad sign for whatever it is the meeting is about. This
      phrase can mean a couple things, neither of which is good:

      1. The “but” version: “I was told this BUT I think it’s wrong.” The
        person never completes the sentence that way, BUT the implication is
      2. The “don’t care” version: “I was told this AND that’s all I
        know.” This is possibly the more discouraging version, as it shows the
        person is not following through or engaging with the project.

      With #1, the person speaking won’t/can’t clearly state her distrust of
      the information she is passing on, even though she is perpetuating it
      by doing so. Maybe it’s the boss’ pet theory or the latest trend in the
      industry or the conceit that everyone has agreed not to question. Ick.
      This version usually indicates a management and communication problem.

      With #2, this is an employee problem. Why hasn’t the person followed
      up? Laziness? Lack of interest? Too many other projects with higher
      priorities? Or maybe this one is related to #1 and the person has not
      gone any farther with the project because it’s a dumb idea. Inaction is
      a form of protest.

    • #3063072

      How could he not be an expert?

      by Veronica Combs ·

      In reply to Better Business Blogging

      I was listening to an interview with a guy from FEMA
      this morning on the way in to work about
      the official response before and after Rita.
      The interviewer pressed a lot harder than usual, trying to get real
      answers out of the guy, and wanted the official’s assessment of the Houston evacuation and the gridlock
      caused by people trying to leave Houston before the
      Scott Wells, the federal coordinating officer for FEMA in Texas, said
      that the official response and evacuation were fine.  He said that
      the quality of the response depends a lot on the local set
      up, saying that they didn’t lose communications in Texas like they did
      in Louisiana (it really was their fault), and he wouldn’t comment on
      the gridlock in Houston, “I refuse to second guess. I’m not a school
      teacher so I’m not going to grade the evacuation.”
      The interviewer brought up the Texas governor’s statement about the
      highways being a potential death trap because of all the people stuck
      there and asked if Wells thought the evacuation should have been
      handled differently.
      “I’m not an expert on evacuation,” Wells said.
      Wow, that would be like me saying, “I don’t know anything about the
      Internet, so I can’t reply to your question about the quality of
      information on the site I’m responsible for.”
      Maybe this guy also used to manage horse shows before he got his job with FEMA.

Viewing 3 reply threads