Discussion Locked

Clueless in Seattle

0 helpful
276 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

This is page 2 of the discussion. Read the opening post

276 replies

by itgirli

Two places I never want to go to:
Seattle and California.
Crazy morons bent on their own enforcing their own insane ideas on the rest of civilized society. I would love it if LA did sink into the ocean and all the California coastline with it. Freaks.

by dr dij

We're just grooving here. ALl we want is to be left alone so we can surf, rollerskate, hike up the earthquake faults, bike on wilderness trails & be eaten by mountain lions - definitely too cute to kill. Bad kitty! Noo!!!! Aaahhh!

And maybe grow a bit of ... (to feed the seeds to our parrots, I'm sure). Sounds like you need some.

And with global warming, we will probably sink into the ocean. But Florida's first! They're lower. And hey, I didn't vote for the Pot-hole-inator governor, who digs potholes in roads so he can fix them in front of a TV camera.

Yet strangely he makes sense. Govt should NOT be spending MORE than it takes in. There are no market limits on teachers salaries as there would be if schools were private. Everyone is trying to grab more and more gubmint money. (I guess they are everywhere).

by oz_media

I used a single descriptive word that actually does apply in more then one way if you really want to dig. Unlike yourself who is shown time and time again to spew pure lies and then you just go flame me in third party (the lowest form of cowardice) fashion like some child who was pushed over at the playground..

by oz_media

obviously havign read the first post there is a clear indication that I understand what the process was.

Technically they did 'order' him arrested, but it is up to Canada's own court to decide whether to execute that order I suppose.

But even though you decided to pin point wordking in one comment, it doesn't make your comment accurate. Many people have used the term order and THAT is your defense about pepoe's complaints.

It's like when people talk about Bush and say he said XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX whatever, you will instantly say he didn't and ask fo rthat specific quote, not realizing that it still doesn't change his reaction.actions but just the words he used.

You aren't defending or describing events, just digging into the wording used as if that excuses the event itself.

by oz_media

I am referring to the raids, when the US court ORDERED his arrest, this then means tat Canada must take ti to court, as I explained they did, and then have the RCMP make arrests.

YOU are now pointing to a PORTION of one (out of three) articles provided that has nothing to do with ihs arrest at all. THat is referring to the RCMP's cooperation wit hthe DEA who were conducting the investigation that lead to his final arrest. My comment was regarding his arrest order that came after the events.

And who the hell are you talking to now? Can you not speak directly to people, or is that just too scary for you.

I didn't say, Max said ....., then MAx went and.....then Max always......I speak to YOU for som ereason, and yet you still don't understand a point or a word anyone says, it's such a miniature little mindset you show here. Perhaps like your core values, just some BS so that you don't have to think.

by dmambo

Hey, Oz,
you write "As a result of the arrests, people in Vancouver lined the sreet outside the seed bank and protest US police presence in Canada, though not a physical presence, they had ordered the arrest and this has infuriated many locals, who are already adamantly against US political actions."

Maybe I missed it in the thread, but why did the Candaian/local authorities submit to this request? Unless it was an action upholding a treaty, did the government "bend over forward" and just take it? Were they using it for political cover so they would not be seen in a bad light for arresting this guy on their own after a long time of ignoring his behavior?

It seems to me that if they wanted, the Canadian gov't or local police could have told whatever US agency was involved to get bent.

I'm sure there is a significant portion of the Canadian population (my mom-in-law for one) who are glad the arrest was made because of their personal feeling about drug use.

You also state "The guy that sells the guns may be breaking a law in some countries, but he is not a murderer unless he uses them to kill someone." How can you compare guns to something dangerous like pot??? ;)

by oz_media

Has beenconducting UNDERCOVER INVESTIGATIONS in Vancouver?! How would people feel if the RCMP were on anundercover stakeout in West Virgina or something? Americans would flip inside out screaming injustice.

There's NO WAY IN HELL a Canadian investigation being ocnducted IN the US would be tolerated by Americans if people KNEW about it, they would be screaming blue murder outside the WhiteHouse about it.

Turn the tables and it's, "Gee, so what? We are the world police and his seeds are being used by our criminal citizens to commit crime here!"

It's just so incredibly two-faced there's no way Americans would stand for this in their country.

People like Max are just standing up because they will defend any action America does and refuse to accept the obvious fault in thier ways.

Bush could be having people gassed and Max would say 'but they are democrats, they get what they deserve. In 1534 China....'. He would rather see America walk all over the world than see them focus on thier own problems, it's so much easier to look at the other guy.

But to conduct an undercover operation, and 'request' place an order to Canada to have him arrested, for selling SEEDS is just too much. I will completely accept cooperation of our intelligence gathering systems and law enforcement to see that serial killers, rapists etc are not allowed to walk free by crossinga border. But to investigate another country's citizen, IN THAT COUNTRY, and then have that country place him under arrest because YOUR laws are stiffer is just wrong. It's overstepping a fair boundary and should never see a coutroom.

YES I am blaming Canada's courts system for actually seeing his arrest as being remotely sensible. But I've never claimed Canada's system was even close to reasonable, it goes without saying that I didn't like thier action, but nobody can accept that the US is wrong in so many of these similar issues, people actually think the American government smells nice or somerhing?!?

by jamesrl

Perhaps Americans aren't aware, but there have been situations where the reverse has happened. Canadian law enforcement works in conjunction with US law enforcement, to the point of sending officers down to the US to participate in busts. These have been initiated by Canadian law enforcement - if the leads send them to the US, there is usually good co-operation. This helps in situations where they want to make simulatenous raids on both sides of the border.

If the DEA are conducting undercover operations in Canada, I am sure they notify local officials and are subject to following Canadian laws regarding wiretapping, searches etc.

If Marc Emery was stupid enough to send hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of seeds to the US and think he was safe, then he should have researched the law before he sent the first shipment. Plus there is the money laundering charge. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

My understanding is that selling seeds is illegal in Canada, but not prosecuted. No one should say thats the same as legal. Just because we tolerate it within our borders, doesn't mean we should expect our neighbours to tolerate it cross border - and thats the real point - Marc shipped across the border, and he should have realized the potential consequences, consulted with a lawyer.

James

by beads

Frankly, I have personally seen battalions of foriegn: Troops, police and "investigators" of various types here in the US for years. I have meet RMCP as well as others working with "local and federal" law enforcement types "investigating" or "training" here on US soil on various accounts.

Its no secret that we have even had Chinese soldiers using one of our main strategic training centers in California. To think for one half of one second that this sort of thing isn't reciprical is ludicrous.

You seem to think that Bush, the Republican party, the Nuns down at St. Barbara's and Max Edison are out to get you, OZ, and Canada in general. Most Americans either think or treat Canada like some sort of 51st state with its own currency. Sad but true. Likewise, I have meet Canadians with a huge chip on thier shoulder concerning this little inferiority complex with being America's northern nieghbor. Take your pick find one group or another and someone will choose to dislike or hate them for whatever reason, whatever time - just for being. Its a simple fact of human nature and niether of us is going to change it, at least, overnight.

Whats really happening in American politics is the normal cyclical shift in politics that swings from liberal to conservative and back to more liberal politics again. The biggest thing in the conservative adgenda is to convert all us stupid heathens to good southern, Bible-bumpin' conservatives. All while transfering as much money to themselves from around the globe to thier own personal pockets. It doesn't matter to these people where the money comes from: Africa, the middle-east or Europe as a whole. They want the money - honey! Thats what you get from oil Barrons running the country. Southern style Gooberisms and the rape of the environment with a little preaching to act as a cover to boot.

That my enlightened friends is what is really happening here in America. The guy selling a few ounces of pot seeds is nothing more than a casualty of American policy. A shamefull example at that but there are others more egregiously trampled by the current administration. See Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

- beads

by oz_media

What happens to him in Canada is fair game, it has nothing to do with this whatsoever.

NO I don't think the Canadian government is without fault at all, I have never said as much in all the time I've been here.

I have never supported Canada's political decisions, perhaps onceor twice, but I don't think our government is good and yours is bad. The difference is, I can admit, accept and understand that we have a joke for a government, unilke people who simply refuse to acept any flaw or issue with eth US government, no matter how blatant.

As for ordered you're right the 'tone' does change, and that 'tone' (aren't we reading here, or do we now hear tone in messages?) should have helped understand what was behind the comment. Canadians didn't order his arrest, they would have completely ignored the issue. It was upon America's 'request', 'recommendation', 'overbearing suggestion', or yes, order that Canada then dragged it through court and issued his arrest.

I am also not the only person who has said that here, so I guess OTHER people do see it as being ordered by the USA.

BUT, the terms used there are so irrelevant it REALLY doesn't matter. Max just likes to make something out of nothing when he is forced to try and think. (My turn for some third party flaming).

And toiterate how irrelevant Max's comments are, I don't think EVERYONE in the US knows that they are nuts in Seattle and California". I have actually found some of the nicest Am"ericans I've met in the Seattle area.

But you said EVERYONE knows, and that's just a lie, proving how you spin the truth.

Pretty stupid reply that doesn't address your issue at all, I guess that's my point regarding Max's comments.

by jdclyde

It was your insistance that you NEVER claimed they ordered at the beginning of this thread that was in contention.
[i]
"As for your example of how I spin the truth, in reference to his arrest being ordered, my first line of the fist post here states; "US police in Seattle asked Vancouver police to arrest political party leader and marijuana activist Marc Emery for extradition to the USA."

So your implication that I have suggested his arrest was ordered is a bonified 100% lie. As seen here: "(Or he's just stupid and repeats the lies when others spew them, just like a parrot.) For example, under the current extradition treaty between the USA and Canada, such a thing can only be requested, but never ordered."

For example? That's not an example, that's a lie, I said they "...asked Vancouver police to arrest..."[/i]

Nothing out of context, nothing misrepresented. Just you pointing out part of your original post/flame while denying the last part.

I don't recall you starting an anti-canadian government discussion, but I do recall you starting many about the american government. Why is this? Matter of fact, not any anti-british government discussions either.

This all from the unbiased "I never said I hate America", but just acts like it. You need to step back and look at how you post. You may not intend it to come across like that, but that is EXACTLY how you often sound.

Maybe even admitting you misspoke when it is clear you did would add to crediblity instead of saying it doesn't matter?

The fact that you "accept and understand" about your government being a joke and other not having that same enlighenment means to only BASH America?

Like in many other discussions, it is a good thing that it does not take your agreance with what I say or think that makes them valid or not.

by oz_media

As you collect my comments, that I don't really smoke anymore, a puff or two with people on occasion but not as a rule. You missed the entire point, sorry, you IGNORED as always, the entire point behind the comment itself as you simply cannot provide a reasonable answer, as someone else had predicted above before you posted here.

When in a corner Republicans seem to cower and think they are hiding. "Maybe it'll just go away"

How about addressing the object of people's comments here. Instead you start running off on me being a stoner? How stupid.

Marc Emery runs for mayor and that's no big deal, how many times has your name been on the ballot?

And you comments completely diregards the fact that it IS relevant that he ran for mayor, we are discussing someone's community profile and community voice here, so just RUNNING makes you a well known voice and advocate for the people. My comment supported my point very well, yours had no point at all.

I am not insulted, I didn't claim Marc Emery spoke for me or that (as you claim about Bush) I believe everything he says before I'll believe anything else.

I don't praise Marc Emery, I just noted that your comments proved you have absolutely no idea at all what you are talking about. There isn't one ounce of valididty or common sense shownin your argument and you are just typing for the reson of flaming someone. You are SO transparent and simple minded sometimes.

by maxwell edison

.
Yea right. You only said:

"he is a (political) party leader"

and

"he has run for Mayor"

and

"he is known from cost to coast by millions"

and

"he is the voice of the people"

and

"the one who represents those who support him in the thousands wherever he goes"

and

"He was going to bat for the people"

and

"Marc Emery is the result of the following and support for the voice he has in Canada"

.....and you suggest you weren't singing his praises? Ooooookay, whatever you say, dude.

What was that you were saying about having taken LSD? It does cause permanent damage, you know.

In fact, "The immediate effects of LSD are sometimes followed by long-lasting or even permanent changes in a user's psychology, point of view, and personality.....An LSD trip can have long lasting or even permanent negative psychoemotional effects.....There are some cases of LSD inducing or triggering a psychosis in people that were apparently healthy prior to taking LSD......In (some) cases, the psychosis may be chronic..."

Now we know.

by jdclyde

Why bring unbiased logic into this? It is much more interesting to hear how the US NEVER co-operates with Canada and then turns around and treats it like a whipping boy.

Yes, we all know that the entire contenent works together to fight the flow of drugs and has for a long time.

Yes, we all know that just because something isn't inforced in Canada has no bearing on if it will be enforced in other countries.

Are you sure your REALLY Canadian James? ;\

by jamesrl

We have a huge problem with gun smuggling in Canada. Specifically firearms are bought in the US (maybe stolen too) and sent illegally into Canada where they often end up used in crimes. Estimates by the Toronto Police are that fully half the gun crimes in Toronto involve guns smuggled up from the US. Legal in US, illegal here....sounds familiar.

Currently we don't get co-operation from the US on this matter. But we'd like it. I think co-operating with the US on drug issues helps rather than hurts the issue.

From an interview I heard this morning on CBC Radio, this guy shipped $3 million dollars of seeds last year. Not sure how many went to the US, and apparently he turns all his proceeds into the promotion of legalization, but its still a pretty huge volume to ignore.

James

by jdclyde

are in full support of enforcing ALL gun law that prohibit illegal sales or usage of all firearms.

Don't need new law, need to enforce the ones we already have.

Sitting about 5 hours from you, and I never hear anything about this issue. Crazy, huh? Either the illegal trafficing OR of any lack of co-operation.

by oz_media

HE has to fund his own campaigns flights across the country etc.

3 million is a spit in the bucket really, how much is spent when others campaign? And in most cases with huge monetary support from those who support them. People just don't like someone that speaks for the minority anymore, absolute power and control is a must it seems.

by beads

Since I am not really in the know, here. How many seeds would it take to make three (3) million, guessing, Canadian dollars, worth of pot seeds?

Understand that this is not a trivial amount but before I go out on to Chicago's busy streets and make enquiries - can anyone shed some light on the amount? LOL.

Probably be arrested for making such an inquiry as my office looks at City Hall here but curiosity is curiosity.

- beads

by absolutely

What about the free market?

What about the failure of the War on Drugs as a failure of the command economy strategy of a "sin tax"? Why, in this case, is it OK for the government to decide what's fun and what isn't? Who does not get to decide how to pursue their own happiness, in MaxLand?

by maxwell edison

.
You have the right to smoke yourself silly, regardless of the weed, plant, or whatever vice of choice. And may the flake of the cocoa plants fly up your nose, if you so desire. You have the right to remain wasted, but not to have anyone else support you while you enjoy your delirious state. You have the right to waste your life away, but not to waste the fruits of someone else's labor as a means of support.

Who said that I supported the war on drugs? I certainly didn't. I actually believe it's stupid. And I support the legalization of such recreational drugs. And I would support an across-the-board pardon for all people in prison for violating minor posession and drug use laws. Shall I go on?

I also think that some acts of civil disobedience are also stupid -- as illustrated by this dumb-ass Canadian, Oz Media's modern day folk hero. Believing in something is one thing. Shooting yourself in the foot to make a point is something entirely different.

by absolutely

Don't make a rule that diminishes liberty more than it protects it.

Whose liberty, whose rights are advanced by this insane "War on Drugs"?

Sober folks? Sorry, they are at risk of drive-by shootings [i]only[/i] because the prices of a few intoxicants are inflated by government interference in a market that worked without violence when it was governed only by the Invisible Hand. It's admittedly a small risk for people who live in a "safe neighborhood, I'll grant, but whatever risk is involved is [i]entirely created[/i] by the DEA's interference in a phenomenon they have now proven for 30 years to be unable to deter in any way but to shift popularity from one drug to another. That is not progress.

by absolutely

...nearly as badly as wars on drugs kill people.

I condone any non-violent protest against the retarded DEA.

by oz_media

Have been made more than clear here on more occasions than I can possibly begin to remember.

My stand is that I do not have Canada's government in my face, if I did ,I would complain.

I do not have Britain's government in my face, if I did, I would complain and in that case even vote against it (I can vote in England not here though).

I have also never suggested Canada or Britains government is not a corrupt institution with nothing but thier own best interests in mind. Though Canada's government does actually bow to the people when they make noise and they consider indivuduals protests publicly, (they don't usher them away as we saw with people wearing political t-shirts at the wrong conference).

In this case, I have mentioned how Ottowa has bent over for the US, but they alwasys do that and I wouldn't stand behind them when I find them wrong. Unlike US 'Patriots' who would never second guess or question a political move if they supported the party as a whole, or even th eperson as an individual. It's not ALL shite, som eif it's good, and we see some good from ALL parties, we just need to be more critical of our governments overstepping thie rboundaries. Which in your case seems to be anywhere they choose to be involved.

In contrast, YOUR government has always been relatively cool and has stayed out of my face/business, for the most part, exceptions like 9/11 etc I can accept of course as I also did Canada's participation (which is currently getting pretty nast yas violence is on the rise).

Ever since GWB has been in office, your government made it's issues EVERYONE else's issues. My country was flamed, my country of origin was flamed your government has been nothing but hostile and inconsiderate of the rest of your allies.

The reason it BOTHERS me though, is because all I see day and night on TV, in the papers etc., is American politics that I strongly oppose.

I do not support GWB's policies, his policies are in my face daily.

Canadian politics is pretty quiet and internal for th emost part, it's just another bunch of suits in an office, as is England's. I have to go out of my way to keep abreast on British politics, you have to search to even find much going on in Canadian politics, but US politics is everywhere. At least 40% of my $100/mo of TV is US BS.

It's in my face so I am in yours, if you wish to debate these issues of course.

by oz_media

You said he was a "small and insignificant pot smoker."

I merely took that opportunity to prove some of the impact he has had on a specific (large) society that supports him. How he is known across the country etc. This validates his arrest as being one of example and one that is noticed throught the country.

[b]Therefore he is not a "small and insignificatn pot smoker" as you so claim, because he isn't in your face everyday as you would expect a strong voice to be.

If I had hailed him as a hero, I think I would have probably offered him more merits to begin with.

I know you are just trying SO hard to push that comment back at me, because you have proven that you idolize the BUsh Administration and the Grand Pooh Bah to boot, all hail the great Bush and all that. I haven't sung such praises for Emery at all, I have voiced an oposition to the US investigating a crime in Canada and then calling for his arrest and extradition over something like selling POT seeds!

Don't you have a war in Iraq to deal with or something?

And don't tell me that you can be multiple places at once, because that is making the whole US focus appear very thin, they can't be everywhere and focused accordingly on every problem simultaneously.

Anyhow, I couldn't give a crap about what you think today, really.

I just signed a killer deal and I'm moving again to seek bigger and better things, not too happy about that part but it's worth it.

by oz_media

As I have said before, I completely understand cooperation between forces, epsecially in a case of a multinational drug ring or murder case.

But this is just the DEA launching an investigation in Canada and then requesting a Canadian search and arrest warrant followed by extradition for POT SEEDS.

I just can't explain how politically wrong such cooperation can seem. This is an issue with US drug operations that have many such outlets for the product around the world. Marc Emery was a statement by the police alowed by the crown, that was really 'crossing the line' that's all. When these cooperative agreements are first imposed, this is the lax use of it that people fear and oppose. As I said, next thong they'll be arresting some poor pisssed off kid in Montreal for his website suggesting people jaywalk.

by jamesrl

Just the same as if he did telephone fraud or internet scam or whatever to a US citizen - he shipped pot seeds to US citizens. Thats the difference.

You may see politics in why they chose to target him, and you wouldn't be wrong. But he did allegedly ship pot seeds to US citizens and launder money in the US. He isn't being charged with anything he did in Canada that stayed in Canada. I think you will find the raid was to get evidence of his US shipments.

James

by jaqui

manilla rope, still heavily used on ships is made from the "pot" plant.

yup, it's the stems rubbed into fibers and spun / woven into rope.

so how can you state unilaterally that those seeds were used for criminal enterprise of growing a narcotic? the grower could very well have been growing for making rope, as well as clothing.
( hemp based clothing is as soft as silk, and stronger than denimn. )

by jdclyde

In a great deal of your posts you will pull out a GWB snyde remark that has nothing to do with the case.

I hear about how Candians don't follow politics, yet you follow US politics. You know what I do? Turn the channel when something comes on that I don't want to watch.

I hear all the time about US company did this or that. Much of the timber is controlled by the Japanise and the EU.

Not all ships that dump are US, but that is the only country you complain about doing it.

You complain because I would ask why your coast guard isn't guarding your coasts, enforcing your laws. That is what government is for. Cops, military, coast guard. That is what they do and that is their purpose.

Something happened that has you out on a limb, and it puts more into your posts than I think you realize. There is much more to the over-generalizing of anti-republican is anti-american.

I try to stay calm, and rational in my replys to you and USUALLY I think I do. Sometimes I hit the submit instead of the close window, but I don't think it is that much at this point in my life.

I don't agree with everything you say. I don't have to. This doesn't make me right or wrong anymore than it does you. I do think you have been more emotional than logical lately, but what do I know?

No matter how wrong you are, I have no bad feelings towards you. I just don't understand all the hate sometimes. (unless it is aimed at my soon-to-be-EX-wife)

Have you started taking your laptop to the pub again? ;\

by oz_media

I have mentioned that this is not JUST a US issue, I have explained that it is found in Vancouver habour all the time frominternational cruise ships.

But the cruise ship companies aren't proposing opening a new terminal in ANWR that would increase the vast volume of ships and spills.

My focus is on US ships because the US is looking to expand that industry, one which the coast guard cannot currently keep on top of, or any other coast guard around the world for that matter, this happens everywhere, but THEY aren't trying to increase that volume, the US oil industry is.

The oil industry has Bush in thie rpocket and he is responsible for American actions, he chose the career, if it was Joe Blow, I'd have it out on him. It's not the person in THIS CASE, as much as it is the power that allows it to continue and those who lobby for it.

As for changing the channel, I've heard that one before and actually listed a list of channels. Out of about 60, almost everyone was a US network or affiliate network. WIth about 4 Canadian channels and some multicultural stuff tossed on top. It is mostly US crap though, don't get me wrong, I love to kick back and giggle to a stupid sit com once ina while. Although it's mostly crap, it is entertainment when wanted and you have to get all teh BS networks in order to get the few channels I do want un a tiered system(Discovery, A&E etc.)

Yes I know you have an opinion and you are entitled to it, I certainly wouldn't expect you to CHANGE your opinion becauseI think otherwise, but often people need to see more than one side and possibly find information they did not know whenforming thie rinitila opinion

My main point here is that teh Bunker oil is SUPPOSED to be dumped t aauthorized stations, this is a law around teh globe. IN MANY cases, people are NOT obeying th elaws and it is happening so that the coast guard cannot stop it as it is, increasing that volume will only increase the problem, and the problem is HERE, RIGHT HERE.

Yuo have hundred of thousands of police in America, why haven't they stopped the drug trade yet? WHy aren't they doing thier job?

Because they simply can't be everywhere at the same time, but they still stop a great deal of crime. The US won't decriminalize weed because it fears an increase in uncontrolable crimes or something, it's the same thing here. We already have waste and simply can't keep up, we don't need more.

by house

Though it's a hell of a lot easier to travel North across the border than South these days. Once you get here, you may be stuck for a while so make it a good one.

Just don't do anything crazy, or we'll ship you back. And believe me, you don't want to be standing around while some suit with a broken marriage goes in full fist in the search for greens. ;)

by jamesrl

These guns are bought legally in the US, and then smuggled across the border illegally into Canada, where they find their way into the hands of criminals. So there isn't a US law to enforce.

The problem is highlighted by a rash of shootings in Toronto this week. Overall crime stats are down, but shootings are up. Check out the Toronto Star website for more info.

And I am not in favour of the gun registry in Canada, because that will only track people who buy guns legally, and thats not where the problems are.

James

by dmambo

"Go Leafs Go!!"

I've sat back and read the vitriol spewed forth in this thread without too much comment, but now you've gone too far.

GO HABS, GO!!!!!!!!!!!

by dr dij

or Bush will ask for $80 billion to fight the War on Drugs, and invade Canada! :(

Too bad they closed down that 300' border tunnel! It was kind of clever. Even made it onto Daily Show

by beads

George (Bush) is just pissed that he didn't think of it first.

Imagine he'll be asking for plans for a tunnel to Ottowa from DC, next. When what he needs is a tunnel back to Tex-ass where theres a village whose missing thier idiot.

- beads

by oz_media

He'd at least qualify for STATE idiot.

I mean, look at how well he's done at being the whole world's idiot!

There was another article in a local newspaper today about Enery and how they have asked for an inch and taken a mile with the whole Canadian court cooperation.

The next page had a write up on a Cuban band that is playing in BC. The opening patagraph is (and again this is to showcase a Cuban band, LOL)

"Add to the list of reasons to hate George Bush the fact that he refuses to lift the embargo on Cuba. Not only does this leave the country impoverished, it also deprives the rest of the world or some incredible music. Furtunately La Candela are here to take up the slack."

This is local news, I guess he has made quite an impression onpeople other than myself.:D

by oz_media

If you search for marijuana seed sales you will get all the other 'dealers' too.
They range in the $200.00 range per packet, which is based on ssquare meters of plant and apporximate yield per packet. Avg. seems to be abour 400- 450 grams indoor and 500 grams outdoor.

He also sells hydroponic equipment, which is completely legal here and there are MANY hydroponic stores that cater to the indoor grower of 'household plants and vegetables" Some of these store in upscale areas too. There is a LOT of money it as is his books and guides, bongs and pipes etc.

It's a big trade. But now lets look at th guy who buys $1000 worth of seeds.

Emery makes a portion of that, after expenses are removed of course. $1000 would be about 5 packets or 2500 grams of marijuana is worth about $37,000 if sold in small quntity on the street. So a big grow op, unvesting many thousands in seeds could be looking at returns upwards of a quarter million. And yet they focus on Emery's income instead of those distributin a clutivated bud to the kids on the street and earning immense sums for 60 days work.

Even Emery's webite clearly stated that seeds were Canadian and Dutch. Again, why isn't anyone raiding a store in Amsterdam, love to see how well that would go over. And they actually have legalized smoke there, so these guys are facing less of a sentence than Emery.

Emery's site is shut down, with a few links to other stories on how the BC Marijuana Party decries a loss of sovereignity, a discussion forum about the raids, and updates available on tha Cannabis Culture website (Emery's magazine).

They also encourage people to call local authorities and provide the phone numbers for the Mayors Office, The Vancouver Police and The Vancouver Sun newspaper (a very high profile paper that always supports Emery)as well as a link colecting donations for Emery's legal fund, as always.

They are also having a rally of defiance that advertises free weed for attendees. It WILL be sizeable!
http://www.emeryseeds.com/

by house

The registry is a simple cash grab for the government. People often fail to realize that procedures only apply to those who follow them.

As for gun smuggling from the US, believe me, most of these guns are coming back with Canadians and not from US citizens. The original exchange is handled with the Americans, but WE bring the guns back for the most part.

by house

;)

[b][u][i]LEAFS[/i][/u][/b]

Now, I suppose you'll bring up the cup thing?!?! You guys always bring up the cup thing.

I have to hand it to you though - I know some hab fans who have switched it up over the past few years - no loyalty. I've been a Leafs fan since I could walk - back before the John Brophy days - man - you know I'm in for the long haul.

When I was younger, my mom's ex dropped a good 40 bucks on some Montreal pj's for me straight from the Forum back in the early 80's. They stayed in the package for at least 5 years before we got rid of them. Nice try buddy.

I just saw buddy's Dallas post on the hockey thread. It just justified his earlier comments over here. Now I understand where he is coming from.

by oz_media

Emery will be allowed to return to his Hastings street 'bookstore' and resume political activities as leader of teh B.C.Marijuana party.

Aw hell, I may as well try and offer the key points, the article was pretty long.

[b]Canada is being forced to fight the US war on drugs on it's own soil says the BC Civil liberties Assn.[/b]

Murray Mollard, BCCLA executive director says the treaty bind the hands of Canadian Law enforcement and the courts.

"Clearly there's a real appetite here for treating drug issues differently that the Americans" Mollard said "And yet we find ourselves being bound by having to facilitate a war on drugs that the majority of Canadians don't want to persue"

Almost seven ou of 10 Canadians support the marijuana decriminalization according to a recent poll by Canada SES Research.

IN a city where councillors back progressive drug policies, Emery's arrest has prompted local politicians to question the role of the police.

"I can think of a lot worse problems in the city that need attention from the police."MPA Coun. Sam Sullivan says.

And Emery's lawyer questioned why his client had never been charged locally before.
"For nine years (Emery has) been doing this quite openly and they've done nothing about it."

Emery was granted $50,000 bail, although the Crown has asked he remain in custody, arguing the 47-year old was likely to re-offend. Emery will be allowed to return to work at his Hastings street bookstore and resume political activity as the leader of teh BC Marihuana Party. Emery's next court appearance is in late August.

So the problem being debated is that Vancouver POlice were directly involved in this case to enforce a law that 70% of Canadians do not oppose. This is considered a complete waste of our resources in order to satisfy a US war on drugs, THAT is the key issue being puched now.

It's a waste of OUR time and OUR taxpayers money.

by jdclyde

If it is okeydoky, then why hasn't the laws been changed yet? When you have a law that everyone is allowed to ignore just because it isn't popular it undermines the rest of the laws. Someone else can then come back and use this as grounds, because he doesn't agree with a different law.

You can't pick and choose which laws you will obey and expect to maintain order.

by absolutely

Ambivalence. Voters, cops, and judges are ambivalent about pot. They think it's bad, but not a lot worse than beer, possibly not even [i]as bad[/i] as strong varieties of distilled liquor. The result is that none of us know what's what.

I like smoking pot, but I don't have time for the legal process, to which I can be subjected at any time by a police officer who needs to make his quota. Or a neighbor who didn't get free tech support. :(

At the same time, real criminals can finance other, truly criminal activities, by selling an innocuous plant at a cost that's inflated by misguided law, because it still tastes better than beer to a lot of people, and is at least equally fun to a lot of the same people.

Prohibiting harmless behavior only punishes harmless people.

by beads

Have to agree with Oz that its a complete waste of time, effort and money - on both sides of the border.

The question is, as I do not know the local politics in Canada, how difficult would it be to legalize marijuana in Canada? Is this a BC versus the other provinces issue? Or does the rest of Canada, outside of BC, feel friendly twoard the whole issue?

Get the law repealed and the US will have nothing to say or waste money on the issue in the first place, now will we?

- beads

by jamesrl

What we have today in Canada, is a defacto criminalization - the law still exists but is unenforceable for small amounts, based on a few court decisions. Larger amounts, for the purposes of trafficking, are still actively prosecuted. While each police force has some discretion, they act pretty much the same across the country.

Decriminalizing would make possession an offense, like a speeding ticket -pay your fine, no criminal record, no huge drain on the courts.

I haven't seen a survey but most of the country doesn't seem to be all worked up over simple possession of small amounts of marijauna.

James

by jamesrl

I've met growers of hemp -its perfectly legal (in Canada not sure about US) because the THC content is extremely low. But you would be extremely naive to think that thats what he was selling.

I can state that it was criminal because it is a crime in the US to sell or distribute pot seeds in the US. I am sure Marc knew that or ought to have known.

James

by jaqui

it's actually the male plant that the rope and clothing is made from.
the female is the one that has the high thc content.
the thc is used to catch the pollen from the male to make seeds.

we all know that Marc is selling plants bred for high thc content. but if the females were being destroyed then the end user wasn't growing for the narcotics use.
( not likely.. but possible )

at 1000 an acre to license from Candaian government to grow legal hemp crops it ain't a cheap crop.

but the return is about 20 thousand an acre so it does pay well.

by beads

If Hillary Clinton was right about: "It takes a village to raise a child." And your (Oz) is right that Bush is the idiot of the state of atleast Texas. Then we can correlate that it took the entire global village to raise this idiot; to a new hieght at the very least.

As for Cuba. It does seem rather un-Christian of him to not lift an embargo against another "Christian" country now doesn't it? Of course the official stance is "Athiest" but I have never meet an Athiest Cuban. There are many here in Chicago as well.

Ahhh... to be a hypocrite and still feel good about ones mixed morals.

- beads

by oz_media

They all used to hang out in Cuba and treat it like a retreat for the wealthy, actually it WAS a retreat for the wealthy.

Castro kicked 'em out of the sandbox and they're still personally miffed.

Political reasons, sure they can find dozens, just as Bush can find dozens to support his BS or others here do the same.

by oz_media

BC politicians are FOR conservative drug laws, BC COURTS are for conservative drug laws.

Our people, 7 out of 10 are FOR conservative drug laws and don't knock the recent decriminalization at all.

So the problem is, due to this agreement between our nations, our LEGAL hands are bound, the courts and those enforcing the laws, when they are bein gpaid by taxpayers.

They are FORCED/OBLIGATED to act on the US behalf, thus WASTING our resources and undermining a major issue that supported decriminalization in the first place; the freeing up these resources for what the PEOPLE of Canada deem more imperative than a costly war on drugs that doesn't resolve any real problems.

As for HEMP seeds and the HEMP byproduct used for textiles and rope. Emery's store ALSO sells hemp clothing, as do two other related stores on the same block, he also sells books on how to create your own textiles from it and how to grow it for such uses.

OF COURSE there's the underlying abilty for someone to grow a stash and make millions that way too (thus makin gthem a far bigger criminal that would obtain these seeds through countless other outlets), we aren't completely unaware of this, but in Canada it has been the majority opinion that our tax money is better spent on more realistic solutions and policing our real problems instead. And that is a major issue behind Canadians feeling a los of sovereignity due to this binding agreement.

by oz_media

Decriminalization is not the real focus of the marijuana advocates though. IN the past, if you were caught, they'd give you aa stare (MAYBE) take it away and that would be that.

If you were caught with LARGE amounts, then it would be taken to court, though often thrown ou in no time and with little repercussion to teh offender.

IF they busted some guy selling dime bags on Hastings, he would be selling dime bags on Hastings later that day or the next morning after it was tossed out of court.

They can drag 'em off to jail, but they can't seem to find a judge to convict them. This cost the city MILLIONS each year, OUR money was being wasted.

NOW, they impose a HEFTY fine instead, so they don't have to waste court time, but most people would not bother paying it anyway. If push came to shove, a free lawyer would get you off on a minimal charge.

SO NOW they just stand to make money off the issue and it STILL hasn't been resolved. People are still facing fines and possible legal action (bench warrant for failing to pay it).

As for Canadian public opinion, a recent enws piece in Vancouver said recent studies show 7 in 10 in FAVOUR of decriminalization. Which is one step closer to legalization but if the city does make money, that wil never happen.

They aren't writing the tickets though, just telling people to take it elsewhere and away from people , if in public.

So, it's niether here nor there really, no legalization, no criminal charges, no tickets seem to be handed out. Nothing really changed, here anyway.

by jaqui

case was the power behind the attitudes here?
it's actually kind of funny.

since possesion for personal use wasn't a criminal offense someone with 5 kilos of pot in his trunck made that claim when charged.
the judge ruled in his favour.

seems having 5 kilos of pot is not for purposes of trafficing.. when you live 120 miles from town, up in the arctic... and get caught with it in september.

that loophole was plugged afterwards. yet the legal system is acting like it hasn't been. the new legislation is more specific on what it personal use, yet I do think a judge would take into account remote residence in an extreme climate still.

by oz_media

Are actualy quite clear now,under 15 grams, nice number that makes a half ounce slip under the radar, though there is a $100-$400 fine they CAN impose.

You face a fine, over 15 grams and you face a criminal charge. .

A comment about decriminalization and US laws;

"There is no basis for Bush's claim, and he himself must know that. What must really concern him is that if our experiment with decriminalization succeeds, it will underscore the embarrassing failure of his own drug policy, and will increase pressure for decriminalization in the USA.

Bush's marijuana policy is fatally flawed, because even if he could completely eradicate the supply of pot, Americans would use other substances to get high. Take Japan, for example: There, marijuana has been scarce, and young people have instead resorted to sniffing solvents and using amphetamines. Evidently, eliminating the supply of marijuana can actually encourage more dangerous practices!"

The Nixon era war on drugs, when voices don't say what htey WANT to hear, they are hushed. Seems this happened in the Bush era too, with the reports to congress too when it was shown that the US was breaching agreement regarding the OFF sanctions as did Saddam.

Nixon hides the truth:
http://www.alternet.org/story/12666/

by oz_media

They guarantee female plants.

Or you can buy HEMP seeds and books on how to make your own hemp products, which is acceptable here.

Even small grow ops here are no big deal, people with a dozen or so plants are left alone.

We've decriminalized it to save our tax money from being wasted on a war on drugs we don't feel is needed. But now we are still bound to make these silly little arrests at teh expense of OUR tacpayers because another country thinks we should.

by house

is what it really comes down to. It is up to the grower to drop the females early if he/she wants a very low THC content.

I'll admit though, Marc's seeds are rarely used for clothing and rope. BC Big Bud, Northern Lights, and AK 47 - thanks bud-eye - three of the strongest ropes in the world. So I've heard. ;)

by oz_media

As I've mentioned before, the government in Canada is relatively quiet and low key, but it does listen to the people and will seem to act for the people due to the way our parliment alllows a little more equal opinion beteen parties and thus represents a broader voice from several groups of supporters.

Canadian courts have been against drug laws and want more conservative laws, politicians and police feel the same way, thier time could be better spent on more harmful issues than pot.

The people of the country feel the same way, the entire country has a conservative vew of marijuana use and doesn't feel that citizens shouls be penalized. To this time, it has merely been decriminalization, not legalization yet.

But that made EVERYONE happy. So to see a man's arrest as per a US request based on stiffer drug laws and what is seen as a wasteful war on drugs, it doesn't sit well. Not with the people, not with the courts, not with the police and not with the politicians. BUT, we are BOUND by agreement that can be used in so many other very useful ways, and yet is wasted on senseless and USELESS issues such as this.

Absolutely, you are right; "Prohibiting harmless behavior only punishes harmless people."

Not a single death due to marijuana on record in history. Yet you (the US in general)support gun ownership?

From another of many different sources of info I've run across:

"The total number of deaths (in the USA) due to all the illegal drugs combined is about 4,500 people (2500, 2000 herion, marijuana 0). Now compare 4,500 deaths with the number of deaths due to prescription drugs, alcohol (which is about 80,000 people), tobacco, over-the-counter aspirin, and sidestream smoke. The total number of deaths due to these [b]legal[/b] drugs is well over 500,000 people -- every year. The multi-billion dollar drug war ignores the half-a-million deaths due to legal drugs and instead makes the illogical claim that 4,500 deaths due to illegal drugs justifies a multi-billion dollar shooting war."

by absolutely

1: illegal drugs cause 4,500 deaths/year
2: making war on illegal drugs costs more than $1B (conservative estimate, you'll see why!)
3: legal drugs kill 500,000 people/year, over 100 times as many!

Do the math: making war on legal drugs would just be too expensive, it would cost at least 100 times as much as our present war on drugs!

I'm really tired of people who vote for "harsher sentencing guidelines" for drug offenses, because they can only be brain-dead if they don't understand that the drug-[i]related[/i] crimes -- crimes against person and property -- will still be illegal without the idiotic anti-drug laws that make drugs expensive, which in turn [i]causes[/i] drug-related crimes, both of person and property.

The real reason for the drug war: most gangster movies with no dramatic value, written by writers who can only create suspense via special effects, rely on the drug culture for their "plots".

by jdclyde

There are more issues than just people dieing from ODing.

How many car crashes were there because the driver was stoned?

How many people got shot because of turf wars?

I am just playing devils advocate here, as all the worst case senerios should be reviewed to the just how bad something can get to decide if it is a good or bad thing.

Yes, I know people that function perfectly fine while using pot but I have also met MANY that are totally useless once they light up.

Legalize and regulate strongly.
zero tollerance while driving.
zero tollerance for anyone that is responsible for the lives of other people.
zero tollerance around children.

Besides that, your not my problem if you light up or not.

by oz_media

THose issues were included in the numbers.

That's ONE of the reasons deaths due to legal drugs (alcohol, over the counter medication and prescription medication) was so much higher.

Aspirin can be a LETHAl drug if not taken responsibly, it causes severe internal bleeding of the liver and kidneys fail. People use it to kill themselves all teh time. Another point is that in areas such as much of poorer England, Australia etc. where marijuans availability is far lower than here, they have LEGAL drug problems, sniffers (glue, paint and solvents) which creates FAR mroe aggressive behaviour and violence than smoking pot does.

SO your question of how many people have died from smoking pot and driving stoned (on marijuana) = 0

There has yet to be a SINGLE death contributed to the use of marijuana, in any fashion.

Perhaps smoking and DRINKING has caused accidents resulting in death, those two must be carefully mixed, but it is the alcohol that creates the severe impairment and inability to drive safely, not pot.

If you ever get stuck behind a guy doing 50MPH in the right lane of the highway, that's the stoner. The guy on legal drugs is speeding down the express lane, running STOP signs and flying through your children's school zone.

by absolutely

Zero, when drugs are legal. Without prohibition, supply will increase relative to demand, which has been shown not to increase with legalization (NL), until being a drug dealer is "barely profitable". Standard economic theory: competition causes profit margins to narrow (to the point that they are not worth killing, and risking dying, to protect!), and only the most efficient businesses can cut production costs enough to compete.

All your zero tolerance requirements are reasonable to me, as long as they are applied equally to alcohol & cigs.

by oz_media

Most of those guns ARE registered legally and owned by upstanding citizens of America who like a little sport.

Then some low-life breaks into thier home or car and steals it, smuggles it out the country, scrubs and and fences it. Then someclow-life from Canada, buys one, thanks the US and goes and shoots up a kid who resembles his highschool girlfriend that cheated on him at the prom.

So technically, a lot of the guns are registered, but the bottom feeding dregs of society will always find a way.

Edit: to be more inline with the topic;

That sawm lowlife that stole the gun, sells it to a Canadian drug dealer who shoots another drug dealer that is cornering his $400,000/yr enterprise. So then they go and arrest Marc Emery for selling the drug dealer the seeds. Hmmmmmm.

Fair enough, now go and do the same in Amsterdam and parts of South America too, the criminals sure as hell will.

What? are they pissed that they blew so much cash in Iraq, so they have to get others to waste some taxpayers money and take heat too?

It's just such a PATHETIC example of law enforcement,our tax dollars and international alliances at work. Very sad result.

by bfilmfan

Don't support terrorism! Buy home-grown and made American drugs!

I now return you to your regularly scheduled discussion flaming!

This could qualify as the Firday yuck, no?

by oz_media

Yup you're right there, but unfortunately, Americans aren't happy if someone has something they don't.

The good ole US homey just isn't sutting it when the homey here is worth a near moint in the USA.

One problem I do see a lot of is Coke coming here FROM the USA and being traded straight across for weed (BC Bud). Sure coke is cheap crap now, compared to what I was doing in my sex drugs and rock'n roll heyday, but it's still an illegal substances that floods our country from the south and causes FAR more harm to Canadians than Canadian weed has EVER caused in America.

by jdclyde

using one problem to justify another.

Something else they did is worse, so what we do doesn't matter.

How about just hold everyone accountable for what they do?

If there is such a "problem" with US coke, then why doesn't the Canadian government DO something about it?
If there are illegal guns coming in, why doesn't the Canadian government DO something about it?
If there is sludge dumping, why doesn't the Canadian government DO somethign about it?

You were talking about self-evaluation further down. I think there are plenty of problems in paradise that just aren't being addressed by your current government that you are perfectly content to blame the US for. You don't LIKE a war on crime, but you complain about US coke coming in? Pick a side, and make sure you like what they are about before critisising the other.

by jdclyde

Everyone knows that the Wings are going to take it AGAIN this year! :X

Been around too much decriminalized marydoyouwanna cigarettes or what? Maybe bumped your head? ;\

I wonder if you got a blood transfusion if we could "fix" the canadianism out of you? :^O

by oz_media

Was it Cheech ?

"Marydo youwanna?"
"Yeah, Marydoyouwanna!"

"Mary do you wanna take your mother to the GANGBANG, the gangbang...."

by beads

Wild hemp makes the best rope - period. Though illegal to grow in the United States after WW II its still available outside of the US. In fact it goes quite well on my farm in Michigan. Not to confuse anyone but I do live in Chicago for now but have a little 80 acres farm in Northern Michigan as well.

Other outstanding hemp facts (or what I really learned in college)

- Most of the signaturers of the Declaration of Independance, grew hemp!

- Washington and Jefferson also grew hemp! Though I doubt they'd want to smoke the stuff.

- Growing wild hemp was common in the midwest until after World War II primarily for War time rope usuage but can be used to make a study denim like material as well. I find hemp clothing to be a bit stiff myself.

Enjoy!

- beads

by absolutely

It's only because of the availability of red maple leaf patches, flags and stickers that any of us can travel to other continents at all! (and live to tell about it) Our country is known worldwide as the home of "people" like "Ben Damper Leto". It's always the noisiest ones that attract the most attention.

And whether you like Celine Deion (sic) or not, it is the United States fame factory that got her voice into every mall, radio playlist and Bar Mitzvah, not the Canadian lust for world supremacy.

by oz_media

Hemp clothing is for sale all over Vancouver. When it was first inroduced, and as you say, it was very stiff and itchy, much like a burlap...at first.

I have since seen dress shirts (of all colors), bikini's, pants, jackets, hats, DRINKS (yes they sell hemp iced tea etc.)etc.

the clothes now, you wouldn't tell from a dress shirt anywhere else, except it is much cooler while still being FAR more durable and longer wearing.

Times have changed, hemp is now a textile such as cotton or wool, it is more durable than other textiles, and MUCH more expenve too due to the very limited production and costs incurred.

by dmambo

The wings will be known as the gs after this season, as I don't think they have much "win" in them. They are old and too deep into the salary cap to do much about it.

by house

..I was trolling for that one. I thought it would be good for a laugh. I guess that makes me no better. ;)

That was the 'definitive' response to this thread that I was expecting. Sorry. Heh.

by house

Durability aside, it's way too starchy. I'm not a fan of hemp clothing. Maybe for industrial cargos - that's about it.

by house

I think that there are more Canadians who play for the Wings than the Leafs. The Wings have always had a huge Canadian roster.

I don't mind Detroit though. They're right on the border and part of the original six. The Wings were only second to Montreal as far as Leaf rivals were concerned when I was growing up, so I've a rich enough history with them to respect the organization as a REAL hockey team.

Though the southern teams have players who play for the game itself, I often question their fan base. Hell, it was cheaper to fly from Calgary to Tampa and back with room and board than to try to snag tickets in Alberta during the last cup.

by oz_media

Reading info from Washington State's Attorney's office I have found that the DEA had been taking his mail and photocopying the return addresses on the envelopes, though nothing has been sumitted to incriminate others of course. How they visisted the seed shop, bought some seeds and had some more shipped to the USA, when they asked Marc if he could set them up with a couple of ponds of marijuana, he said he didn't do that kind of thing and couldn't help them out. AWWWWWW. :(

But here's a comment that made me laugh, gee what's wrong with THIS picture?

"We are not going to turn a blind eye to Marc Emery's illegal multi-million dollar sales of marijuana seeds," said U.S. Attorney John McKay. "The grows that sprout from those seeds are often protected by armed criminals or rigged with lethal booby-traps. They do significant environmental damage, and fuel the organized crime and drug trade that destroys lives."

First of all, he blames the seeds for creating an denvironment where criminals in the US protect thier grow ops with guns or booby-traps. Uh, excuse me, sir...don't you think that the criminals would STILL be criminals without the seeds from Emery? Emery doesn't provide information on buildin gbooby traps and he doesn't tell them to buy a gun to protect thier crops.

Secondly, and this one slays me, "They do significant environmental damage"

Since when has anyone south of the Canadian border been concerned about environmental damage? If the US government was growing the weed, or if US companies were making millions, they would be defending it's environmental acceptability.

Again though: "...and fuel the organized crime and drug trade that destroys lives."

Where rock do they FIND these people under?

Another comment, can't find the page again now, was that they had FOUR drug ops that claimed they purchased seeds from Emery. So now, they are showing how they busted people but figure they'd go after the big guy instead? These US criminals, with guns and booby-traps apprently, have ratted out Emery as the source for ther seeds, being completely ignorant, the authorities feel that closing that seed shop will end the crime?

Just click on IE or Firefox and buy the next batch. It's not the seeds, it's the criminals that see they are used to make a dollar off of drug users, pot is often bought by crack heads etc as a 'come-down' drug. It relieves stomache cramping and helps the apptite that is lost from Heroin and Crack withdrawl between fixes.

Talk about barking up the wrong tree, these guys don't seem to have the slightest CLUE what they are doing.

Someone should arrest the DEA agents who investigated the case and have them infirmed for psychological evaluation, these people are obviously not sane enough to hold positions of authority.

by jaqui

heroin withdrawal painns are better eased by mixing one tablespoon of jello with one 8 oz glass of cold water and drinking it.
the gelatin actually eases the transition of the heroin from the bone marrow, reducing pain drastically.
( got that from rehab worker here )

and crack has no pain, it's a purely mental addiction.

yes, weed is often used as a painkiller for far more than just reducing pain from withdrawal, it is actually prescribed for cancer patients.
( compassion club membership card allows for chemo weed* ownership in any quantity with zero legal repercussions )

*chemo weed, grown un the biology labs at UBC, with chemo-therapy drugs added to help people fighting cancer with both cancer and pain.

by oz_media

While this webpage is an endless list of arguments, and offenses against the US machine, the last few paragraphs do make some interesting comments.

But if you have the time, wade through the rest, it really doesn't paint a great picture of the USA, but whilst it must be taken with a grain of salt, SOME will still find it fit to completely discount it as it is just so hard to believe that they MAY have been wrong or misled.

http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4473.html

by oz_media

Well too long for me to type out here, but here's the bulk of it and a link for the full interview.

After basic intrdoduction and explanation of what happened on the day of Emery's arrest he is asked;

[b][u]Interviewer:[/b][/u] What is your take on the DEA's investigation, in THIS country that lead to you being arrested.

[b][u]Emery;[/u][/b]

"Well that's a tradgedy that our policice have been co-opted, our politicians have been co-opted, by a goliath of a tyranny called the United States of America, under the Bush administration.
Our country is in GREAT danger of surrendering it's beautiful values of tolerance, of compassion, of reasonableness to a VERY unreasonable archipelago of goulag strung out across the United States. With a terrible dominator complex that cruelly imprisons tens of thousands of people for marijuana every year for terms of 5, 10, 15, 20 years; a friend of mine named Mike Smith in Oklahaoma was growing 200 plants and was sentenced to 30 years in jail last year. These are beyond the pale, this is no more legitimate than the people in the Republic of China getting imprisoned for life for practicing failing failing Gong (sp?), or people in countries of the world where they are put in jail for thier political point of view.

I am the most recognized and well known advocate for the civilisation of our marijuana laws, in the world and am targeted specifically because of that. THe DEA has admitted that this is the purpose for this whole persecution.

[b][u]Interviewer;[/b][/u] "But you must have known that there is an extradition treaty with the US as a mutual legal assitance and criminal matters act. and in addition, the DEA has been operating in Vancouver since 2002. Did you ever anticipate this might happen to you?"

[b][u]Emery:[/u][/b] Well, it's not so much that I anticipate the Americans would arrest me, I have cetainly always been willing to take my case before a Canadian court, for Canadian law. What cannot deter me however, is that my life, in the cosmic balance is not significant compared to the repression and suffering of millions of people, like me, around the world who rely on someone like me to provide hope, and the concept that one day we will be liberated from our bondage. And that this terrible pogram against us will end.

So ultimately then I may have ot be sacrificed then, although I would like to think that Canadians will come to my aid and rally to our cause and realize that our whole value system of being Canadian is at stake here and it is the politicians, perhaps, and our courts may sacrifice those values to appease an EVIL, EVIL organization called the United States of America's government."

[b][u]The interviewer asks;[/b][/u]
"What do you say to those who say you are breaking Americans laws and really flouting them, therefore you brought this upon yourself?

[b][u]Emery;[/b][/u]"I never thought of myself as breaking American laws CANDIDLY, I thought of myself as workin gwithin what was given to me task and approval, afterall, I gave $380,000 in personal income tax to the Canadian Revenuce Agency, which was split by teh Federal GOvernment of Canada and the British Columbia government, they KNEW it was for teh sale of marijuana seeds. It said on my income tax return, 'this is for teh sale of marijuana seeds, I am giving you this money. They KNEW that, I had many meetings with income tax and they were happy to take this money, they wer ehappy to admit that I had sold marijuana seeds, and they had no objection to it."

It's an 11 minute interview so I'll leave off there, here's a link if you wish to listen to it in it's entirety.

It certainly shows just how my MILD my dislike for the US government really is, when compared to a real Anti-US government voice and a VERY big voie for Canadians and millions of others around the world.

Your government is the CAUSE of much unrest around the world. It's not exactly the voice of reason or peace.

Comments have included, [b]tyrannical, unreasonable achipelago of goulag, unreasonable and an EVIL, EVIL organization,[/b] later he says that the US administration is out to totally destroy us and our culture. There's more if you care to listen to the 11min. audio interview. It closes with a comment from a local caller who echoes many similar views supporting his arrest as provided here.

http://pot.tv/archive/view2.cgi?number=3913&redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.timmeehan.ca%2Fcbc-20050805-aih-emery.mp3

So the issue as it sits now, IF it manages to get through Canadian courts in less than two years, he will then appeal the Supreme Court f Canada, known to be very accepting of such charges. IF he is then finally etcadited to the USA, he will also have several appeals he can make there too.

by jdclyde

When it was just your standing up for him, he was just another joe on the street standing up for what he believed in.

Now we know this guy is a few oz short of a full bag.

goulag, evil, tyrannical. Oh this guy has lost all traces of sanity and will probably end up in a padded room for his own good before he would end up behing bars.

Sorry to rain on your parade, or not admire this lunitic rantings. I know you see him as some hero, but he is just nuts.

by oz_media

"I know you see him as some hero, but he is just nuts."
No, you don't know, because I don't see him as some sort of hero.

He is an educated and politically aware/capable man. He is a very respected member of the community and is known across the country for his political ability. I believe he made the top 5 on a mayoral ballot and also debated in Ottawa with the Liberal and conservative opponents. HE has representaive of his party in all provinces and is by FAR a much smarter and HONORABLE man than the George Bush could ever hope to be. He is a man with a history of success and an ability to make money, GWB is a man of average intelligence amongst his peers, that has failed in his own business ventures and lost millions of other people's money too.

Emery has some valid complanits though as iterated on his website, which is also linked in the posts above.

If HE is a nutbag to you (bacuase he calls it as e sees it), then you need to stop and think for a minute. PERHAPS there is sometruth nehind the hundreds of scandals and other allegations that have followed your government for decades, that are just quietly slipped into hiding.

A great majority of the world's population are nutbags based on your false premise. And I mean a GREAT deal, and that's only because America has enough citizens to qualify as a fair minority against the rest of the world and only a percentage of Americans believe it. Getting to be a small percentage of world opinion now aren't you? Even half of your own countrymen don't buy it. http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4473.html

You seem to be missing a major point that I have made so many times here, THIS IS HOW PEOPLE SEE THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT! Tyrannical, VERY unreasonable archipelago of goulag, with a terible cominator complex. Or as most say more simply, arrogant, stupid and bullish.

Not just me, not just Marc, but MOST people.

It is only the people (sorry Jessie, some people) in the USA that don't see it. But you know what they say, love is blind, and don't tell me you've never learned THAT lesson before.

The US oversteps it's boundaries and expects everyone to listen up as it feels fit. Too bad I suppose.

But as expected, your comments were on his dislike for the US government and not the legal issues, did you even LISTEN to the full interview? You haven't addressed any of the issue he raised, you haven't addressed the idiocy behind arresting a seed salesman and not focusing on the organized criminals who use booby traps and guns to protect thier illegal enterprises. Marc Emery has a storefront, an email address and is happy to meet you, he's not the criminal in hiding that you need to get instead. These organized criminals ar enot about to be shut down just because Emery Seeds is no more, his competitors have been warning about dealing with him, stating customers will be traced and prosecuted, while they in turn try to take over the industry for themselves. You can buy seed sfrom four other Canadian dealers that I know of, there are simply hundreds if no tthousands world wide, Emert is simply an example and a personal bone for some US nutbag to pick.

IF this ever makes it to a US courtroom, which may never happen, US and Canadian relations will be demaged irrepairably and very quickly by the citizens of Canada as more than 70% are in favour of conservative drug laws and opposed to US drug laws as well as thier insistance on wasting OUR money to arrest people we don't deem criminals.

You also seemed to have missed the fact that he was ratted out by dealers in the USA looking for a lighter sentence, which is really a stab in the back because he also goes to bat for the freedoms of these people who face severe incarceration in the US.

They then make out like he's some massive entrepreneur making millions and sitting on a bundle. He has no home of his own, no car, no material possessions to speak of, he is really not interested in that crap. MOST of his money goes to helpingpeople get bail, providing lawyers and support networks for people who ARE facing ridiculous "unrealistic" charges in other countries, such as the USA.

He fights for the little guy with HIS pocketbook. How un-American of him!

He was not allowed to provide his own bail as it was to be made available by 'surities' from BC homeowners. Which were provided.

One guy decided to crop his entire grow op a week early and sell it with ALL proceeds (aside form a few pertinent bills to be paid) are going to Emry's legal defense. Again, something that would no thappen in the US.

You see, whle we speak teh same language, we wera the same clothes and look very similar in most ways, Canadians are NOT Americans. We are not America's little brothers, we are NOT America's bed buddy.

We are a completely indpendant country that simply shares a border. YOU government wasting OUR tax money is not very welcomed in Canada. Especially in such a waste of an issue as this.

Agan to quote U.S. Attorney John McKay; "The grows that sprout from those seeds are often protected by armed criminals or rigged with lethal booby-traps. They do significant environmental damage, and fuel the organized crime and drug trade that destroys lives."

This MORON, (definitely a few JD's short of a bag) is completely insane in makning such ridiculous comments, I wonder if he realized just how DUMB he sounded after he read his own comments.

he' scomplaining about seeds because of organizaed crime and people who protect thier crops with guns. Is he SO stupid that he doesn't realize that anyone who boobytraps anything and uses a gun to protect it, legal or not, is a person worthy of time? It' snot the playground, it's the player.

WHY don't these same issues exist in Canada and occer on a regular basis if allowing marijuana would bring on such behaviour?
How retarded is this person of authority in the USA? He's completely clueless, not a HOPE.

Typical American reaction though, if something is awry in the USA, it must be somebody else's fault. There's no way the US actually creates it's own criminals with it's ridiculos laws.

The political motives behind US actions is not new, it's been questioned since WWII, but it's always swept under the rug and brushed off as lefty ranting or righty BS, instead of anyone actually realizing that they are the stem that flowers these problems and maybe, just maybe, thier trusted president is just another lair politician just as everyone else has to put up with.

Don't examine yourself, when you can simply pass the blame to others, it's far easier, yet not very effective and people are just sick and tired of the USBS now.

The loopholes for Marc that will probably see his extradition stopped by Canadian courts;
http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4473.html

A long way to go before he's extradited.

by house

http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4473.html

in case you didn't see it the first three times ;)

Thanks though Oz, that was a good read. I haven't seen anything of interest since last weekend when this thread was started. TR definitely needs more of this stuff. I've had my fill of tech discussions for a while now.

by oz_media

Well at least it's real. Debating real issues on our own turf for once, instead of the two-way speculation of events in the Middle East.

by maxwell edison

.
Are we supposed to be impressed? What percentage of the vote did he get? My guess is no more than.....let's guess.....three-tenths of one percent or less. So that would mean that three-tenths of one percent of BCs dope smoking voters didn't forget to vote that day. Who cares? That's about as insignificant as it gets.

You say he's an educated man? Where did he get his degree? From Cheech and Chong Bong University? Did he even graduate from High School? And you suggest that he's "smarter than President Bush", who graduated from Yale University and received an MBA from Harvard? Oh really?

"I was always an anarchist in my classes, always bringing disorder to the teachers' design of order. I really didn't like my schooling.....I got midway through grade 12 and then quit school"
- Marc Emery

He's "politically aware", you say? And this is the guy who called for the abolition of the public school system? And called for banning all health-care for people over 70 -- IN CANADA -- saying they should just die!

And you said, "he is known across the country for his political ability". Only if you call getting arrested dozens of times "political ability".

And you said, "He is a man with a history of success."

"We had never made enough money to save any at Hemp BC.....We really worked hard to recover. Employees had pay cuts that went on for months, bills went way behind and our credit rating was trashed because we fell grievously behind on paying bills."
- Marc Emery

"After two years of living in Asia in search of Shangra-La, I had built this house.....I spent all my savings, $30,000.....I then lost $30,000 dollars. This led to a series of escalating events which caused me to completely run out of money."
- Marc Emery

You said he has, "an ability to make money".

But he can only make it by selling illegal stuff.

"He is a very respected member of the community", you say?

"I spat on one of the (Canadian) police officers, but I don't believe I assaulted him because there was no pain, no bleeding, no consequence."
- Marc Emery

I wonder if that Canadian police officer respects him?

"In a snit, a pout, I had come to the conclusion that Canadians weren't worth saving and that my effort was wasted on them."
- Marc Emery

Ooooookay.

You said, "If HE (Marc Emery) is a nutbag to you (because he calls it as e sees it), then you need to stop and think for a minute."

"I have often seen the future, and it has come to pass every single time. I have also seen visions of a greater, more beautiful future, and of other dimensions.....But that's not spiritual, I think it's from the incredible capacity of our brains to absorb ideas beyond the linear? other dimensions, other worlds, other concepts. I like Terence Mckenna's idea that aliens put mushrooms on the planet so we would have an easy means to communicate with other beings and other spirits out there, or other entities that exist in a more astral sense."
- Marc Emery (but he's not a nutbag -- yea, right.)

You claim he's not your hero, but you continue to sing his praises. Okay, whatever you say.

By the way, while you denounce me for my "new title, same issue" harping on my individual liberty stance, that's one area in which Marc Emery and I agree. That's the basis behind his vision and life's mission of legalizing marijuana. You have sure jumped on that bandwagon, but as for all the rest of it, you've criticized at every turn. We now know where your real priorities lie.

"I advocate the position of liberty, the position of justice, the position of non-violent freedom for all people to do what they want, to put in their body what they want, and to act in a manner that is suitable to them without interference from others, especially their government."
- Marc Emery

Gee, that could have been me who said that. The difference is that you support only Marc Emery's primary focus of legalizing marijuana, while I apply the philosophy consistently. But you would criticize me for saying it. How about now?

You claim he's not your hero, but you continue to sing his praises. Okay, whatever you say.

by jamesrl

While I think you two should relax, and stop sniping at each other, and I think that animosity colours your perception of the issue, on the whole, it sounds like Marc Emery is a bit of a crazy man.

Some of the things Max and others have pointed out that Marc has said to not point to someone who thinks carefully before he speaks. Either that or he likes to exagerate for effect.In either case it makes it hard to take him seriously.

And like Max, I am for the "liberalization" of marijauna laws, have been for many years.

James

by maxwell edison

.
Absolutely they should be "liberalized". However, where I part company with quite a few folks, or where they part with me, actually, is where I apply the same principle across-the-board. The government should protect one's individual liberties, not infringe upon them -- period. And I don't care what the issue is.

The government should not prevent a person from drinking or smoking dope. (This is where the disingenuous will suggest that I espouse abolishing the drinking age.)

The government should not prevent a person from selecting a school for his/her kids. (And by taking "school taxes" from that person, but not allowing them to be spent at the school of the parents' choice, may be preventing them from making that choice.)

The government should not prevent a person from keeping all the fruits of his labor, especially when the forced distribution of money from the person who earned it is used to only give fruit salad to the recipient. (Nice play on words, don't you think?)

The government should not prevent a person from owning private property, free and clear, and not subject to confiscation if that person doesn't pay the government a ransom, I mean a property tax, forever and ever.

The government should not prevent a person from deciding for him or her self who, if anyone, is the recipient of, what amounts to charity, whether that be in the form of welfare, medical care, retirement pay, etc.

At least I'm consistent, and my legalized drugs stance is based on something bigger than my desire (figuratively speaking, of course) to smoke marijuana. A person either believes in libertarian principles or not. These people who pick-and-choose the liberties that want for themselves and/or will allow others to enjoy are, in my opinion, about as unprincipled as they come, or they haven't fully thought out the positions they espouse.

And Marc Emery is an idiot. He's actually hurting the libertarian cause by using it to advance his single-issue agenda.

He's a high school drop out, but people are calling him educated.

He's the scorn of most Canadians, an embarrassment to an entire nation, but some people call him respected -- yea, maybe by a hand full of dope smoking customers of his.

He received only one-fourth of one percent (.025) of the vote, but people are calling him some great civic-minded savior just because he got a couple thousand votes from his dope-smoking customers.

He's blatantly violating American drug laws, but cries foul when the American authorities want to stop him from doing it. And his supporters criticize the Americans for it. I suppose they would be just as "tolerant" of an American citizen who would run across the border into Canada, break Canadian laws, and then defiantly laugh in their faces about it. Yea, right.

His supporters call him a successful businessman, but he's probably never earned an honest dollar in his life. From what I've read, he's "made his money" in defiance of Canadian laws, primarily selling illegal drugs and/or drug related items, and has been arrested dozens of times because it.

The guy's a joke -- just like the people who support him.

And the guy is being touted as some sort of folk-hero. I guess it shows the perspective some people actually have.

by oz_media

I have read some of those comments befoer, in full context, they lose a lot when taken out of context though,as always.

Emery is not oin the same plane as you. when he rejects governmenr interference, he is referrin gto exactly what you t interference, as I do also, we are talking on different plans than yourself. You see the government as a system to be admired, but they take you rmoney from you and help others.

Marc Emery sees the US government as a tyranical, overbearing and ridiculous system that represses the masses and sticks its nose where it dowsn't belong, he DESPISES George W Bush and his cronies, HATES his world policies and thinks he is misleading and toturing Americans and anyone else around the world that he sees fit, did you READ his comments on the US government? HE has slammed teh US government for MANY years of torure, illegal actions in other countries etc. He thinks the US government should be abolished completely.

And yet you claim you share opinions? He'd shoot Bush point blank in a heart beat, you would run up and cuddle him or bow at his feet.

Do I think Emery's a hero, no of course not. My hero is, quite honestly, my mother, and that's as far as MY heros go.

I support Emery for his stand and his determination to relax laws that are not wanted.

As for his education, intelligence comes from many places, formal education is not a way to measure intelligence at all, it's a way of showing learned skill. Actions speak louder than words, Emery has made a positive difference for the people, Bush has made a negative difference for the people by dragging thier country's name through the mud, but he HAS made a positive difference for himself and companies like Haliburton.

Emery is ADMIRED, spitting on a cop does not make one unpopular n a place where cops do not have a good reputation, I thought it was the VPD not RCMP though.

When our premier slapped a guy in the face, this made him a Canadian hero, we support those who support thier views and don't expect false PC action all the time, it's not real.

As for success, he has been quite successful, has a knack for business and making money, he lost money, Bush lost MILLOINS and failed large companies, he has no record of business success, legal (not neccessarily ethical but legal)business that is.

So don't even try, you are wasting your time. You will just continue to offer snippets of quoted material, often taken out of context completely, that will only support your claims, as always.

If I thought you would even consider a fair or unbiased opinion, I would be interested in hearing from you. Your spinning is just precious though.

by maxwell edison

.
Playing the "out of context" card again. That's a typical ploy whenever you're faced with a truth you don't want to face.

The source so everyone can see NOTHING was taken out of context.

http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/1423.html

And I could have predicted your, "...formal education is not a way to measure intelligence..." nonsense. You were the one who claimed he was "educated", and we all know what it means. And in this case, it means a high school drop out who has been stoned since he was 21. And he's not "educated". He's an absolute fool.

Just like you proudly proclaimed he came in FIFTH in a mayoral race. FIFTH - WHAT A JOKE. He received .025 percent of the pot-smoking vote.

You just don't like eating your own words, do you? But keep singing his praises. It let's everybody see your true perspective, and it's kinda' "foggy". Now there are TWO Canadian embarrassments that we all know about.

And you know, and your total preoccupation with Bush should be cause to worry. You can't ever stop talking about him. Do you dream about him, too? You're obsessed, dude, obsessed. Perhaps it has something to do with that LSD you took.

(But you admire Marc Emery. Oooookay.)

by jdclyde

for anyone to claim that there are goulags in the US. For people who either have no clue as to history, or no concept of reality when they make a comparison like that.

A smart guy like you and you don't think that is just a little on the fringe to make a claim like that?

And if the WORLD thinks the US has goulags, then I have been giving them WAY too much credit as for being informed and general intelligence.

It is not a matter of examming myself to know if we have goulags in the US because I know that we don't.

Now as for the war on drugs, yes it has been a huge waste of time/money/lives. I have not argued that.

Do I think there is merit in trying to split hairs on if seeds that grow into a plant are a part of a plant? Smoke in the wind, and if I plant a seed for a plant I KNOW what I will get. If it is illegal, then don't do it or don't get caught.

If there is any merit to the charges, then he will end up in the US courts. If there isn't any then he will never get extradited. Any other claims are just so much rantings, unless you are going to tell me that the Canadian Government would extradite according to an agreement without following the terms for extradition?

Loopholes? That is his defense? There are only so many cracks you can slip through, before they get patched.

NOTE: this wasn't the DA from Michigan that brought the country of Canada to its knees, it was from Seattle. Or at least that is the way you are presenting this.

If he wins this will go a long ways towards furthering his adgenda. If he loses he will pay the price of fighting a system he doesn't believe in. Justifying him selling into the US because there are others that will also sell is lame and you know it. Justifying because of ansterdam is lame because they don't have the same extradition, do they? And it is LEGAL there. It isn't legal here or in Canada. (Or England?)

Don't throw me into the same group of anti's so causually. My arguemnets have always been, if there is a law, you follow it or pay the price if you CHOOSE to break that law. If you have laws that you don't enforce, you undermine ALL laws. Don't like a law, change that law.

As for Marc (and people know what I think of that name ;\ ) I didn't make any personal comments on this person that I knew only from your postings until you posted quotes of his showing he is a nutcase. Only a nutcase would think there are goulags in the US.

It isn't for the DA's to CHOOSE which laws to enforce. It is for Congress to WRITE laws. The DA's HAVE to enforce the laws until they are changed or repealed. You know how government works.

Tell us again, how this is all Bush's fault? After you learn MORE about the US, you will learn that the President doesn't make the rules, it is Congress. The President has a lot less to do with the running of the country than Congress does. Want someone to blame? Go to where the power is and HAS been. War on drugs? That is where to fight it. Bush will be gone in two years, but the same Congress will carry on, business as usuall.

by oz_media

No I am not justifying it because others do it. I am not JUSTIFYING it at all. I am just wondering how the DEA and Seattle police actually get off claiming that it is to help stop teh organizd crime and people protecting grow ops with guns and biiby traps due to his selling them seeds. They can get them anywherem they will STILL continue a life of crime, perhaps earning a little less money or becoming more desperate in the process, thus killing and harming more people.

This isn't a resolution to ANYTHING, nobody is saved, helped or protected by closing down Emery Seeds and throwing Emery in jail. NOBODY.
It's a personal bone to pick and anyone who doesn't see it that clearly is as bind as US authorities, it's a poltical pissing contest, a flex of the muscles and all the other things Canadians dislike, such as an expense on our tax dollars for YOUR benefit, a slap in Canada's face and a cheap pot-shot with no purpose.

I NEVER said this was Bush's fault, so I can't tell you again. WHo gives a flying f*** at a rolling donut what US congress thinks? I'm Canadian, US congress SHOULD not effect me or any other Canadian for that matter.

As for Extradition, there's a long way to go yet, he has to be found worthy of extradition by two courts in Canada still, that actually accept his practice, for the most part, make money from it, and also support the conservative marijuana laws established in Canada.

He has political reasons for not being found guilty by the courts here, it is his FAITH and they cannot fnd him guilty of a crime based on his faith or political preference/voice. He is a demonstrator and public voice/advocate, his political basis for his crime is clear, his FAITH in his belief is clear, they will have a rough time finding him guilty when he is actually protected due to these issues.

by jdclyde

This is not someone I would want my kids looking up to as a role model. Would you? If not, ask yourself why and how you can support him anyways?

If I became a dealer, I too could make a lot of money. If I got busted, I too could cry foul for the governments enforcing laws. I too could be a joke.

by jamesrl

You can rest assured that the "quid Pro quo" for the DEA setting up in Vancouver and Toronto, and allowing the RCMP to have offices in the US is to increase the level of co-operation betwen the agencies to tackle these very problems.

I know I've complained about illegal guns coming in, but I read in the Toronto Star over the weekend that ATF is working with the RCMP on the issue, and the RCMP are happy with the progress.

I don't ever think two wrongs make a right.

And I think if Marc is going to send seeds to the US, he should be aware of the laws and criminal procedures in the US, and adjust his behaviour accordingly. If he only shipped to Canada, we wouldn't be having this chat.

James

by jdclyde

and right to the point.

How can anyone disagree with anything you just wrote? Especially because it agrees with me? :)

I do think people should pick their battles. Marc didn't think his out as well as he thought he did. Cashed in his princibles for money because selling seeds in the US does NOTHING to further his agenda in Canada except for making HIM money instead of patitioning to get pot legalized.

by oz_media

You and several others have referred to HIS money.

What kind of car does he own?

Where did he buy his house?

WHat type of watch does he wear?

A) Doesn't own a car

B) DOesn't own a home

C) A Timex if anything.

He doesn't HAVE money, millions goes all around the world in support of people's legal defense (thier right) and to help bail people out, as well as operating his book business, magazine and internet TV station.

HE isn't a money grabbing capitalist, you'd need to set aside all of your business knowledge to understand his position.

He is an activist, not into material possessions AT ALL, and has nothing for himself.

THat 3 million figure that was tossed around was complete crap, HE doesn't have 3 million any more than you do because the company YOU work for makes millions.

by oz_media

In a very recent interview, which I have provided lonks to, he was asked if he considered that and he agreed he had and was prepared to face life in jail or even execution if need be as that is his life's work. He said one issue is the ridiculous sentences handed out for drugs in teh US, and if HE has to face that then he will.

But it does not mean it's right either, the US should not be able to ask for people's arrest in Canada, when the root of the problem is the criminals and growers in the USA. Not the criminals and sellers in Canada. OF course again I must include teh exception for serial murderers, people who jump borders to escape police etc.

THat's not what Emery does, Canada's government accepts his above board and very prominent business, they take his tax money.

by jdclyde

It isn't like I can be a football or baseball fan and still root for the home team, now can I?

So what is a fella to do?

Gooooo Wings!

It really is a shame that they have us in the western division. I would MUCH rather watch us play the canuk teams! Not to mention, the games are on at a normal time! time zones are too big of a hassle when it comes to hockey.

But being VERY new as a fan, no, I don't know much about the teams or how they will stack up this year. Give a noobie a break! Better late than never, right?

by oz_media

I was makign the exact same point you've just attempted to make.

The problems WE address are problems with OUR borders, OUR security, OUR governmenty and OUR citizens.

The problems YOU address are OUR problems with OUR government, OUR security and OUR citizens.

See the difference?

YOU try and fix OUR (and others) problems because you dont like them, and you have no place in trying to do so.

WE try to fix our own problems and in the case of decriminalization that was one of our governments resolutions at the demand of the people.

You are tryign to fix your problems with organized crime, and gansters trying to protect thier drugs with guns, but you do it by launching an investigation and requesting OUR courts and OUR tax money is then spent seeing OUR citzen brought to the US for trial?

THat's the problem, we don't come there and start demanding that you arrest these gun owners so WE can put them on trial, with much more stringent guns laws here.

But as your last ppost really proves, you are more interested in someone else fix THIER problem than accepting that you have your own problems.

When IO m,entioned that and included issues that we have and how WE deal with these issues in our own country, your instant defense is to say that we need to address OUR problems.

MYOFB?

by house

Though you missed the richer parts of the game. Like any other sport, it's big business now. I remember when American networks started the 'streaking' puck and the little light to help the noobs keep an eye on the puck. I knew then that the game was sliding. Oh well. Enjoy. Best sport in the world.

by oz_media

" I guess it shows the perspective some people actually have. "

In a 'nut'shell.

Yes, the government is wrong, and the people are right.

People who support the government are wrong, and people who support people are right.

by oz_media

Before you swallow Max's words like a hungry slut, nobodyt has claimed Marc is seen as a hero except Maxwell.

He is looked up to and supported because he supports people, and in Canada, people who support people are people who are supported.