Discussion Locked

"Day without Immigrants"

0 helpful
208 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Has anyone noticed any changes today?

(For those of you outside the USA, Illegal immigrants and their allies were to gather today for marches, prayers and demonstrations on a planned national day of economic protest, boycotting work, school and shopping to show their importance to the country.)

Has anyone been affected?

208 replies

by dr dij

downtown, main drag Wilshire Blvd, one of most heavily traveled streets in nation, will be shut down from downtown to la brea tarpits.

on news, some people who live there are leaving for the day as know they would be blocked otherwise. restaurants and stores in area shutting. It's a big area tho and this is a small part of it. Our biz is an hour drive away and my hispanic co worker did not take off. our plant workers are here too.

As the catholic bishop of LA pointed out to previous protesters, it doesn't help their cause to wave a mexican flag. Normal US people response is 'If you love it so much, why don't you go back there'. They're waving mostly american flags instead.

by jdclyde

The last wave of marches had the Mexican flags waving, and many nutcases carrying signs saying this is "stolen land", blah blah blah.

This for some reason did not endear the plight of the criminals with the average working citizen with half a clue.

The new approach is to take on the American flag this time, showing that they want to become americans, even if they are not willing to follow our laws.

If there is a massive shutdown because of this "protest", I predict that the only thing this will do is act as a wake-up call to the legal citizens of this country that we have a bigger problem with criminals than we though, if they have been allowed to infiltrate us so completely that they could disrupt us even for a day.

Time to start cracking down hard on any and everyone that hires these criminals to work for them. If the off-the-radar jobs are gone, so will be the desire to come into this country illegally.

Also, many are starting to finally get the fact that "these illegals are doing jobs Americans won't" was and IS a direct insult on the LAZY Americans that are sniviling that they don't have a job, but REFUSE to do these jobs because they are somehow too good for these jobs.

Build the fence. A big one. Find an illegal, throw him back over. Each and every one. No trial, no hearing. You are not here legally, ship them out that day. SEEYA!

Overhaul the immigrations process. People looking for a better life that DON'T HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD that learn the language and want to intigrate in, should be able to get in. It should not be a six year process to get in.

by dr dij

they overload our health care system (many come across border simply to have babies for free with good US health care and for babies to be US citizens), drive without drivers licenses (or pay others to take drivers license test for them, very common in LA), drive without insurance.

also sadly, some mexican Santa Ana councilmen were hit in a sting, trying to extort local biz. I guess they get away with that in small mexican villages.

I'm all for people trying to find a better life, but breaking and entering into the US is not the way. terrorists are starting to use same way to get in. maybe the best thing would be for US to help mexico get same type of biz envt so they would have jobs there.

by jdclyde

The Mexican government is corrupt from top to bottom. Short of a "take over", there is no way that we could do anything to make Mexico a prosperous place.

by mickster269

I'm thinking about boycotting the places that DO close today.

I support immigrants- heck, at one point my relatives immigrated to the US. But mine did it LEGALLY. That's where my gripe is. To support someone who has broken the law just doesn't make sense.

by tonythetiger

the reasons many people state for not wanting the immigrants here are not the fault of the immigrants, it's just that the influx exposes the flaws in our broken system, just as all of our social problems are as a direct result of the same broken system. And this isn't partisan... It's been broken for at least several decades. "The Government" cannot deal with it, and the more they try, the worse it gets.

These people are coming to the greatest land of opportunity on the planet. Just like when our ancestors came here (many of them illegally as well!).There's still lots of opportunity left. I've weighed and re-weighed this issue and have landed on the side of amnesty. Hopefully they'll keep on coming. Until the government finally figures out it shouldn't be in the people business, and stops imposing itself on all of us for the benefit of a few.

by jdclyde

you said the government CANNOT. In reality it WILL NOT.

Both sides are looking to buy voters with this deal, and there is NOT a "right" side to choose between Democrat and Republican. Both are wrong, just for different reasons.

Where is Bucannan when we need him? ;\

by unclerob

- about time someone said it

- "illegals" are illegal, why concessions need to be made for someone who shouldn't be there in the first place is beyond me. Plus there are alot of immigrants trying to get in legally receive a slap in the face because you have people who can't wait and need to cut in line which forces the process to become slower & slower.

- I still don't understand how they find actual work that isn't illegal. If you're working and collect a paycheque, you have to pay taxes, how are they paying taxes with being granted US citizenship or a working visa or official landed immigrant status. Are there that many companies out there employing illegal immigrants willing to get shut down because of this type of problem. Why doesn't the government crack down on them? It would seem that if you stop employing illegal immigrants in the first place it wouldn't entice future illegals from entering the country except for criminal purposes.

And yes, I'm probably very naive about this whole situation but it seems that making exceptions & exemptions for these illegals just complicates the matter and doesn't help fix the original problem of illegal entering the country illegally.

Plus here's another spin, if it's that easy to enter the country illegally, it's that much easier for another terrorist attack to happen - if you can't secure your borders you can't hope to protect your country.

by jdclyde

stolen SS numbers are being used for the ones that get a job that isn't under the table.

It brought Capone down, get them for tax evasion! l

by dmambo

I haven't noticed any difference in the number of French Canadians in the marketplace or the workplace.

As far as the illegal immigrants are concerned, perhaps the effect of the Day Without Immigrants would be more meaningful if they would boycott the police stations, international borders, hospital emergency rooms, courts and public school budgets for the day, as well.

by jdclyde

They are trying to show the POSITIVE side of illegals being here, not let anyone with half a brain see the many negatives that come from having criminals here.

"I like the way you think. I will be keeping an eye on you" - sam kinnison ;\

by dmambo

"...not let anyone with half a brain see the many negatives that come from having criminals here."

You're awfully tough on the French Canadians, aren't you?

And as far as keeping your eye on me, I've heard the rumors about you and I'm not your type. :D

But seriously folks, I'm sure a lot of the illegals are hard-working and the only illegal thing they have done is jump the fence, but I'll bet if you take a census of California prisons, there will be a higher proportion of illegal immigrants than in the general population. Just being in an illegal status puts them at more risk for comitting crimes than the average US citizen. Harder to get legit work means it's harder to eke out a living. And who knows, maybe being willing to enter illegally shows a propensity to to scoff at laws.

It kind of bugs me that the Mexican government calls on the US govt to open the borders. Maybe the opportunities that the immigrants are seeking could be found at home if they could get their own house in order. Start by controlling corruption and narco-trafficking. Just a thought.

by dr dij

what if we BOUGHT mexico? :)

keep it as a separate autonomous region, like Puerto Rico.

theyd' love it as they could all collect welfare, unemployment insurance, and fake back or carpal tunnel injuries and live on disability.

I'd settle for Baja.

by dr dij

the gov't manages to print up made up money to pay for everything, a few more dollars wouldn't hurt, except for those on fixed incomes, the retired, the poor, and the average person. Who cares about those anyway?

by too old for it

... of 18+ years as a paralegal, and a string of A+ work in sociolgy classes at Overgrown-with-Old-Ivy University:

1) If you are here without proper documents, it means that you did not come here through legal channels, and you are therefor an ILLEGAL ALIEN.

2) If you were an ILLEGAL ALIEN in most other countries, you would (a) be a felon and (b) be deported.

3) I have no real problem with a guestworker program, as long as (a) everyone has to go back, go the the US embassy or consulate in their home country, and start over, (b) being here illegally is a felony, (c) employing or otherwise assisting an illegal alien is a felony as well, and (d) NO MORE TAX DOLLARS TO SUPPORT ILLEGAL ALIENS!!!!

Look, I realize why we have so many people coming across the border to get into the U.S. illegally. Because it sucks everywhere else.

by peter warren

Calling for mass deportation and making illegal entry a felony is like calling for an end to crime. It's emotionally satisfying but practically useless. Calling for no tax dollars for undocumented aliens is pointless as well. First it does not take into account taxes that are paid by undocumented workers. Second, this non-solution will only create even more chaos.

by jdclyde

you did not offer a solution yourself.

continue to do more of nothing.

illegal aliens do not pay taxes in the vast majority of the cases.

Solution is in phases.
build a wall to keep it from getting worse.
crack down on any and everyone that hires these criminals.
throw any crimials back over the fence as you come across them, every time you come across them. no hearing, not trial. out.

Massive sweeps is not feasable, nor recommened. Just start by keeping the problem from continually getting worse.

And yes, deny all social services other than emergency care to illegals, and as soon as they are healed, over the fence they go.

No schools.
No welfare.
No drivers licenses.
No nothing.

The do NOT have any rights under the bill of rights because that bill of rights only covers US citizens.

by too old for it

Lots of unskilled US citizens out of work, who with a 12-week familiarization course, (about the legnth of USMC boot camp in my day) would be more than happy to help round up, and deport illegal aliens ... and get paid for it.

by wayne m.

Maybe next people will want to criminalize undocumented ownership (and please avoid prejudicial terms like "unlawful taking" or "stealing"). Why should I be penalized for merely having products without the benefit of a sales receipt? I only want to have a better life for my family. Besides these are products Americans do not want; if they wanted them, the products would not have been on the store shelves for me to acquire.

The point is that the US government has the right and responsibility to control immigration. The government has the responsibility to set policy and determine the number of immigrants that we choose to let into the country based upon the needs of the US and the qualifications of the individual immigrants. There are indeed some questions as to whether wages are currently appropriate and whether additional workforce is needed. These questions, however, cannot be answered due to an unknown quantity of illegal labor in the market. The flood of illegal immigration also has terrible side affects those who try to come here legally.

My wife is foreign born, from Thailand. We have had numerous tourist visas for relatives denied by the US Department of State because we were unable to prove that these relatives would not over stay their visas and work illegally. It is apparently not enough provide arrival and departure dates as well as a place of residence should anyone care to come check. Given that my wife has been deprived from seeing her relatives except every 2-3 years when we can afford to travel to Thailand, I have little use for the argument that had we brought them over illegally, not only could they have stayed and worked, but they could get citizenship as well.

There are valid reasons for having immigration laws and violation of those laws harms us all to some degree. Due to the unknown quantities and affects of illegal immigrants, it is not possible to have a rational discussion on the immigration needs of the US. We need to get our immigration policy under control and do something to reduce the number of illegal aliens currently here. We cannot, however, just continue to allow laws to be ignored.

by jdclyde

Have you tried calling your State Represenative about getting your family the visas?

It really DOES hurt the process and encourages illegal activity when the system does not work for those trying to follow it.

by tonythetiger

"The point is that the US government has the right and responsibility to control immigration. The government has the responsibility to set policy and determine the number of immigrants that we choose to let into the country based upon the needs of the US and the qualifications of the individual immigrants."

Perhaps we should then kick out the ones we don't 'need', and why limit it to immigrants? Let's kick out the worst 'native born' and import the 'best' immigrants. Of course, then you'd have to define 'best' and worst' (or worse, start a government agency for the purpose), and even then, once you got rid of the 'worst', the former 'second worst' would become the worst, and you'd have to kick hinm out too, ad nauseum.

Protectionism and elitism are what you are talking about. They appear when one has been resting on one's laurels for too long, and wants to continue to rest on them.

"There are valid reasons for having immigration laws and violation of those laws harms us all to some degree."

The reasons, and the harm, are something invented by someone a lot higher up the food chain than you and I, and are for [b]their[/b] benefit, not yours or mine. Their perch is getting a little shaky, and it scares them.

by mjd420nova

This is the key word. They are here illegally
PERIOD. They come to take advantage of the
health care program, that's why it costs so much now. I don't want to hear about the poor
illegal alien who works for $5. an hour. Why??
Because it's the only job for illegal people
to take. Employers are taking advantage of this
knowing they won't run to the state and
complain. They say they do jobs that we as
AMERICANS won't do. BS I don't want to hear
it. When the employers begin paying for
AMERICANS to do the work, they will have to
pay decent wages. And we'll not have the
burden to bear for the added expense of caring
for alien children. We like to think that
we are a humanitarian people, but that only
goes so far.. Others say "Give 'til it hurts"
It hurts now, The costs go up but the pay
doesn't because the markets are tight. When
will we begin to care for the CITIZENS of this
country. We are a melting pot, but these are
CITIZENS. Do you want to contribute to this
great nation??? Then participate, become a
citizen and put in your fair share before
you try to reap the benefits. Learn the
english language so you know what we are
saying and can communicate with me. I should
not as a CITIZEN have to learn a second
language to understand you. And don't get me
started on the bi-lingual ballots at voting
time, if you can vote legally then you must
be a CITIZEN and understand ENGLISH.

by jdclyde

And as soon as the criminals get their aministy and don't HAVE to take the jobs that are under the radar, THEY won't do these jobs either.

by cactus pete

Almost any job will be done by anyone, if you pay them enough to do it. The standard of living in the US is high enough that many people won't work for less than minimum wage.

Gee, I wonder how that works...

So it is the fault of employers that this has gotten so out of hand. They have artificially created additional demand for low wage jobs by hiring illegal workers and exploiting them. Vicious circle...

I remember seeing a show where a farmer was complaining that if you don't let these people come here to work, no one will harvest his crop. Year after year.

If you can't afford to pay workers what they demand, year after year, don't plant that much crop!

by jdclyde

because a lot of the money that the criminals make gets sent back to family in Mexico, so a lot of US dollars get funneled directly into the Mexican economy, having never been taxed in the US.

Oh yeah, the corrupt people in charge are going to want to clean up the corruption.

But then again, this is all an imaginary problem, because OZ has clearly shown us that NO ONE wants to immigrate to the US, legally or otherwise. ;\

by jdclyde

And how will you take this. Will you go to that store tomorrow, that let YOU down today?

Not in a large city, so if it wasn't on the news, I wouldn't even know about it.

by oneamazingwriter

that I go to often, jd. That store has been open on legal holidays, but it's closed today to support illegal immigrants. On principle they lost my business. If people don't agree with laws the thing to do is to register to vote and vote to change them. Since illegal immigrants can't register to vote I don't feel that they have any right to dissent.
Apparently they want to stage a revolution and "fix" this country so that it becomes like the one they are running away from. They don't know what they don't know.
I may not be able to stop things that I don't agree with, but I don't have to supoort them when they are illegal.
There's a big difference between inviting a guest or taking in a foster child, and having my home broken into and having that person tell me anything at all about the way I choose to run my home. A thief/intruder is a thief/intruder. A guest is a guest. Adopted family is adopted family.
(Yes, all three stores were run by Spanish speaking people.)

by tig2

As a former Southern Californian (yes folks- there really ARE native Californians)I can say with some level of confidence that you only missed one key thing. Quit making Spanish speaking a requirement to get just about any job in California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. I was required to learn Spanish- self defense, mostly- as a kid. Unfortunately, the only second language that I have ever really needed to have was French- I worked in Canada a few years back.

I personally don't think that there will be any real impact at all. I know that there are jobs that these people do. I also know that race isn't a requirement to do them. Willingness is.

I'm with you, jd. Build a bigger fence if that is what it takes. Illegals don't like the fact that they are required to learn English in order to get an education, find a decent job, or receive services? Tough.

In my opinion, the issue goes beyond whether or not they have gotten into the country illegally. It is the fact that having gotten here, they assume that it is now up to us to take care of them. I have better things to do with my $$$. I don't want my tax $$$ going to that either.

And frankly, if they are so upset by the way they are treated in this country, they are welcome to leave.

And while I recognize that illegals are the point in this discussion, my sentiments apply equally well to anyone from some place else.

I believe in America and support America and Americans. I am tired of being asked to support folks who come here and then complain about the country and its culture. They are all welcome to be excused.

I'll get off my soapbox now...

by too old for it

Welcome to America ... Now Speak English!

STANDARD English, thank you. (This goes for some who be at here a couple generations, and are axeing why they can't seem to get past a job interview.)

And if they don't like it? To paraphrase the late Charles Lichtenstein: We will be down at the dockside waving you a fond farewell as you sail off into the sunset.

by dr dij

I guess I won't see you paak the caa in havad yad?

or 'aincha gun pas the earl' (earl, you know, goes in mota caas)

by tig2

And while you are learning to speak American English, how about you do a quick culture check and figure out how you will conform!

I guess I can almost handle the ones axing questions as opposed to asking them. At least they're trying.

When I was working in Quebec (and murdering French no matter how hard I tried) I discovered that people didn't really care if I spoke French fluently. They cared if I TRIED. The only place where I draw a line on that is professionally. The language of technology, like aircraft, is English. I expect my peers to communicate in that language without fail. Woefully, my expectations are not often met.

And I agree. Don't like it? Buh Bye!

by dr dij

that part is not their fault. it is because of the US population mindset that we have to give free services to everyone. it is because we have endless handouts: welfare, food stamps, health care, disability scams, etc.

I'd suggest: don't force hospitals to deny benefits to illegals. Instead they don't get paid for the services by govt if they are not citizens paying taxes. This way, they would allowed to render any emergency services if they wanted to and could afford it.

by jdclyde

they HAVE to accept anyone with an emergency and I would not have it any other way, for any reason.

These peoples bills do not get picked up by the Government, they get picked up by the rest of the patients that pay their bills. there is a estimated amound of services they will have to write off every year, and that amount is figured into overhead when they determine the price for the rest of us. The exact same process as theft from your local store.

Give them the care, but if they turn out to be illegals, have the police be there when they are released and escort them directly to the border. Do not pass go, do not collect $200.

by sleepin'dawg

Think about it. Some of us will be able to pay the increased prices of food but many won't

[b]Dawg[/b] ]:)

by jdclyde

yes, I could use eating a little less... ;\

I figure I have two months to drop about 20 lbs to get to where I will be able to keep up with my boys better. I can still out run them, but that won't last much longer if I don't get back on it!

by cactus pete

Some people are willing to die for freedom. I suppose I'm willing to pay more for food.

In fact, I have been paying more and more every year.

If it's a great concern, I'm sure corporate officers could reduce their compensation packages a little, too. They can probably still eat.

I wish I could hear what John Kenneth Galbraith would say about this...

by dr dij

print more money; inflation won't hit for a year or two, or it can hide behind cheaper goods coming in from China, and companies paring to the bone becuase of rising costs.

and then he'd tell the bureau of statistics to fudge the figures, make 'seasonal adjustments' to employment figures, and 'excluding energy' adjustments so the inflation figures looked low.

And just plain out lie: he'd tell them to count purchasing of a PC as 10 times its value in capital investment and productivity gains.

Sadly the govt has listened to him and they are doing these things.

by dr dij

did see a special of experimenting with robots to harvest all types of crops.

then of course, we'll have to deal with the robotic subclass revolting (Bender from Futurama is pretty revolting :)

by mickster269

I think she would have problems with a potential outcome of introducing Robots to the workplace...

by unclerob

..."Start by controlling corruption and narco-trafficking. Just a thought."

If the most powerful country in the world can't accomplish the above, how would you expect a country with limited resources like Mexico to be able to do this?

It's hard to fix a problem when no one currently knows the solution. Don't blame Mexico for it's inability to control corruption & drugs, the problem seems to be afflicting most countries nowadays including the U.S.

by dmambo

I know that this statement comes from my gut and totally lacks any hard evidence, but I'll be stupid enough to put it forward anyway. I feel pretty confident in saying that drug trafficking in Mexico is more closely linked to goverment corruption that it is in the US. In the States, it's more of a problem of controlling the demand, which by its own nature is a decentralized process, and more difficult to control. Producer and conduit countries, and I have to believe that Mexico is one, have a greater concentration of power in the drug trade. I'm not sure that can exist without something of a blind eye by the authorities.

I'd be happy to entertain any evidence to the contrary that would sway my opinion.

by tonythetiger

When my wife and I went to a town meeting to discuss how we could help Hurricane Katrina victims. All the 'solutions' were rated, not by whether it was needed or how much it would help, but by who would get the most credit for it. It was quite disgusting, and I said so quite loudly.... as I was leaving.

by jdclyde

that it was YOU that was seen as "out of order" for your comments, not the people that were trading lives and suffering for political chips.

I do believe that this is the best country in the world. What does that say for the rest of the world though?

by jamesrl

So let me ask you, did you come to the idea that you were in the best country in the world through lots of research?

James

by mickster269

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12535896/

"MEXICO CITY - The United States reacted cautiously on Saturday to a Mexican measure that would make it legal to carry small amounts of cocaine, heroin and other drugs for personal use. "

Heck, they can carry personal stashes around soon.

~editied to unconfuse-title.

by mirrormirror

Is it just me or has traffic been much better today? Traffic on the drive in this morning was great! Kinda nice! If this is a direct result of no immigrants clogging up our highways, I say keep it up! More reason for me as a US citizen to say goodbye to all those illegals.

by oneamazingwriter

03/28 : Student protest in Whittier area students from Pioneer, California and Whittier high schools walked out of classes to protest the proposed federal immigration bill March 27, 2006. The protestors put up the Mexican flag over the American flag flying upside down at Montebello High.

That came in my email just now with photos of students doing as it describes. As I looked at the pictures I was furious! Let them boycott anything they want today...they do that most of the time anyway. They work here and send their wages to their native country, and have no intention of becoming citizens.

As for the kids who left that school...it would make sense to me to shut that school down. Why not? Why have tax payers supoort rebels who fly the flag upside down? RRRRR!!!!

And that from a woman who prefers not to anger. It takes a lot to set my fuse off. It's set.

by jdclyde

I have lived here my whole life! :D

Nothing beats personal observation! ;\

(thats ok. you canuks are a close second..... :p )

by tonythetiger

The answer is unleashed capitalism.

"illegal aliens do not pay taxes in the vast majority of the cases"

The tax system could easily be changed to correct that particular problem :)

"build a wall to keep it from getting worse.
crack down on any and everyone that hires these criminals.
throw any crimials back over the fence as you come across them, every time you come across them. no hearing, not trial. out."

Either you want government interference in people's lives or not. In for a penny, in for a pound.

Immigration (legal or not) is not the problem. It's like imigration is the rain, and our broken government is the leaky roof. Think it through. There is enough opportunity in this country to support twice its current population. They are not only potential employees (surely an alternative to shipping jobs to India ;) ) and potential union busters, they are potential consumers!

"And yes, deny all social services other than emergency care to illegals,"

Deny all social services other than emergency care to [b]anyone[/b]. IOW get rid of social services period.

"The do NOT have any rights under the bill of rights because that bill of rights only covers US citizens."

Who did the Declaration of Independence apply to ("All Men are created equal...")?

Keeping them out is punishment just the same as taxes punish those who try to be successful. It's us trying to be like those who punish us. It's protectionism pure and simple (if you're afraid they're going to take your job, then I would submit that the problem is with you, not them). And weren't we complaining about that just a few years ago?

by jdclyde

complaining that i am the problem and not them! :0

Fix the process to make it possible for people to legally come in (as I said before).

MAKE them use that fixed process to become legal citizens.

I have NEVER said anything against immigration, other than to say the process is broken.

I have stated we need to ALLOW more people to immigrate here, provide they wish to integrate into our society and do not have a criminal record. (not counting parking tickets and the like).

I WANT more tax payers, not less. Fixing the process to allow people to legally come in would be good for everyone accept for the hawks that take advantage of illegals.

Declaration of Independence does not apply to anyone accept for US citizens. You will recall that at the time of that writing, "All men" ONLY meant White land owners. So you tell ME who it applied to? :D Black men were not covered, nor were women. It is shocking for kids today to learn that black men got the right to vote before women of ANY color were allowed to. Again, tell me who it was INTENEDED to apply to?

Of course, I would be [b]very interested [/b]if you had links to anyplace that would show in a legal point that it means otherwise? If so, PLEASE start new discussion because it would be too interesting to be buried as a subthread here. ;\

by tonythetiger

the "you" was figurative.

"I have NEVER said anything against immigration, other than to say the process is broken."

It's not the only process that's broken.

"I have stated we need to ALLOW more people to immigrate here, provide they wish to integrate into our society and do not have a criminal record. (not counting parking tickets and the like)."

Nor 'stupid' laws that should never have been enacted in the first place.

'I WANT more tax payers, not less.'

Consumption tax would fix that.

"Fixing the process to allow people to legally come in would be good for everyone accept for the hawks that take advantage of illegals."

We're in total agreement.

"Declaration of Independence does not apply to anyone accept for US citizens."

Uh, when it was written, there [b]was[/b] no 'US'.

"Of course, I would be very interested if you had links to anyplace that would show in a legal point that it means otherwise?"

Legal points are useless when the process that made the applicable laws is severely broken.

by jdclyde

that the US government is printing money that is not backed up with proper amounts of Gold?

Got a link you would care to share?

Thanks.

by sleepin'dawg

but I can honestly say I didn't expect to see much. The day is far from over; who knows???

[b]Dawg[/b] ]:)

by sleepin'dawg

Thanks to Galbraith and others of a similar bent. I am ashamed to admit the man was born a Canadian. He emmigrated to the US back sometime in the 30s and became a life long Democrat, which says much about his economic theories. He could just as easily been a communist. Other than Greenspan, I can think of no other individual who has had such an effect on the US economy, much of it detrimental.

The only nation on the gold standard, which immediately comes to mind, are the Swiss and each and every Swiss Franc is backed by double its value in gold; by law. One major reason for the stability of their currency.

[b]Dawg[/b] ]:)

by dr dij

hospitals with NO emergency services

in fact here in LA due to cost overruns,
(uninsured, etc)
emergency rooms are dropping dead and closing
like trees in the amazon

by dr dij

frail, 'ugly bags of mostly water' (quote from the silicon creatures on startrek)

if those organics think they can lounge around and can't even BUY them, you have to rent or lease them.

seriously, as long as we don't make them TOO smart, we just have to worry about 'nature finding a way' with them.

by jmgarvin

We've had some college students demonstrating (when don't they) and a few signs, but for the most part, NOBODY FRIGGIN' CARES.

You want to know why? Illegal immigrants need to stay quiet or get shipped back...Why come out and say "arrest me and ship me home!!??"

Stupid and pointless...oh and you college students blocking up traffic on Central, I hate you...with all my being I hate you...

by jdclyde

that could have been an interesting discussion. :D

As for consumption taxes. You will hear all day long what a hate monger you are for unfairly taxing the poor poor because a "bigger portion of their income goes towards needs". This is of course said as if it is somehow unfair that some people have worked hard to excel and thus have more money.

But again, we do agree that it is the best solution.

by tonythetiger

I just won't buy it. They are already paying the taxes in everything they buy, they just don't know it.

Their ignorance is not a good reason not to do it.

by mjd420nova

Where does it stop?? The cross the border
illegally, and suck up the welfare, health care and food stamps. FOR FREE?? No, the citizens pay for those services, and the illegals don't
pay penny one into the system. Like a leach, the suck, and suck, until the host dies. Do we
have to wait until no one but the richest
can afford a doctor, or a house, or any of
those items we call part of the AMERICAN
DREAM. CLOSE THE BORDERS NOW.

by jdclyde

Illegals stood up to show how important they are to our daily life, and for the most part showed us that they meant nothing.

Here are a few numbers being thrown around by the advocates of allowing crimials to not be called criminals.

about 4% of our workforce is made up of illegal aliens.
We currently have about 4.6% unemployment.

hmmmmmmmmm ;\

by tig2

Near as I can tell, the only disruption was from the disturbance in San Diego where officers were pelted with rocks and bottles and had to quell the rioting that resulted.

So much for "peaceful protest".

A quote from a friend- "That AMERICAN flag you (illegals) are carrying happens to be MY flag. YOU ILLEGALS are NOT Americans. Don't "f" with MY flag."

Perhaps flag waving is not the advantage it was meant to be...

by jdclyde

"How dare you call criminals criminals"?

"How dare you enforce laws"?

"How dare you not just GIVE us anything we want"?

But I DID call it that there would be more American flags and less of the rest.

Should have been an INS agent on every corner, taking pictures and video. Go ahead and march on by. Don't mind us. Say "cheese"!

by mickster269

I called my son last night, to see if there was any problems in his hometown (he lives 180 miles away, with his mom in a more rural part of Kentucky).

He said there was no display of solidarity with the migrant workers there - they were all too busy working.

As a side note, he also complained how hard it was for HIM to find a job. He's 17, and looking for a part-time entry level job. He understands that with no experience, being young , etc, that there are most likely mops, dishes, and trash bags in his immediate employment future.

BUT! There are no job openings in his home town for entry level workers! They are all taken by (as he put it) "People who's first language isn't English".

I am no way claiming that all the minimum wage jobs there are being taken by illegal aliens. But I WOULD hazard to guess that more than one job is.

"Americans" too lazy to do some of the jobs out there? Not likely. I think it's more now that "Americans" don't have the oppertunity to get those jobs.

- edited for horrendous spelling errors.

by wayne m.

I am not sure how to respond other than to reiterate a couple of key points: immigration policy is widely recognized as a sovereign responsibility and, due to long standing disregard for this policy, it is not possible to rationally evaluate current US immigration needs. I consciously avoided discussing any means of redressing the current situation and I do not wish to redirect this thread.

I had assumed that it was widely accepted that nations control their own borders. To anyone who feels this is not true, I suggest the following experiment. Fly to any international airport and try to enter the country without going through immigration control. Anyone who tries this is likely to be shot, literaly. Furthermore, countries like Mexico restrict worker movement within their own borders. A Mexican must be issued a special work permit to travel to any of the resort areas such as Cancun or Cozumel. Where are the protesters for the right to sneak into the resort to change bed linens? Why is the US singled out to have a free-for-all border crossing?

I had also thought that my second point was self-evident, that due to a large illegal alien driven underground economy, it is impossible to objectively evaluate the affects on the US economy and the level of need for immigrant workers. I am not sure who the unidentified "they" might be, but it is my suspicion that "they" benefit from illegal workers as opposed to being harmed. The key point, however, is that due to the hidden nature of illegal immigration, it is not possible to evaluate the affects and who is affected.

By having ignored the issue for years, the US has allowed a problem to grow, unchecked, to monstrous proportions. Resolving the problem will be painful. At this point, however, I am not interested in discussing possible resolutions, even legitimate ones. I am more interested in consensus that a problem exists.

A government is set up to benefit its citizens, not the citizens of another government. Feel free to disagree with this concept, but do not single out the US when other nations are far more restrictive. Accept this proposal however, and agree that the US does have the right to control entry and oppertunity for non-US citizens.

by tonythetiger

"it is not possible to rationally evaluate current US immigration needs."

Obviously the market is doing that for us.

"A government is set up to benefit its citizens,"

It may have been set up that way, but now the tail is wagging the dog. Our government is supposed to be the servant, not the mommy. MY definition of "benefit its citizens" does not include allowing able-bodied citizens to sit on their lazy asses and suck the government teat until I am bled dry! They shouldn't be in the people business at all. Life is work and there's no reason for anybody to expect anything different. If you cant't or don't want to contribute to society, and you can't find someone else to [b]voluntarily (that's a key word)[/b] pay your way, then you should not be in society.

You're right about one thing, some of these people need to be kicked out. We just disagree on which ones.

by dr dij

Wow, it cut WAY down on freeway traffic!
I didn't need to goto ANY store that was closed!

I say let's extend this protest INDEFINITELY!!

and as DMambo so succinctly suggested, have them extend their boycott to social services, police, hospital, welfare, foodstamps, disability and more!

About the only horrid thing was a few stores in Boyle Heights were threatened with violence if they did not close.

And some anarchists attacked police in MacArthur Park (which was melting after dark, someone left some cake out in the rain.. :) They like to piggyback onto any other demonstrations.

Viva la United States!

by tig2

How dare you step out of the corner of political correctness and demand that we start seeing the evidence of our own eyes?

I think that what ticked off my friend is that he DOES value the flag and all that it represents. The folks carrying it around yesterday- not so much.

Oddly enough, the point you make about INS was made to me several times yesterday.

The problem seems to be that, while growing in strength and number, we of this opinion are still a minority. There is still a belief that if there is any chance that someone might, maybe, perhaps, become even slightly disturbed by what is said- it must not be said.

I am all for productive communication. I draw the line when the definition of "productive" is the same as "meaningless".

edited to correct a typo

by jdclyde

are the people that are unwilling to do ANYTHING about the problem, but complain.
[i]
"We can't do anything because there are too many here blahblahblah, what are we going to do, round them all up and throw them all back blahblahblah."[/i]

START by STOPPING the problem from getting worse. Close down the border.

THEN when the FLOW is stopped, we can start bailing out the boat, as we come across them.

Illegal? Throw them back. No hearing, no goodbyes, no rights. A direct ride to the border and drop them off. What they do from there is not our concern.

If they WISH to apply for legal status, (as I have said so many times now) have a NEW system that only takes a few months to process the people.

Why is that so hard?

Oh yeah, automatic machine gun turrets on the wall with motion detectors and infrared. Cross the barb wire fence and come within 30 feet of the REAL wall, your worm food.

by too old for it

Joint task force here celebrated "Day Without Immigrants" by busting a Mexican-run dope smuggling ring, and seizing 25 kilos of cocaine.

by jdclyde

I wonder if they already had the bust planned or if they set the time in honor of this great day? ;\

All penalties for all crimes should be double if you are not even suppose to be here.

by tonythetiger

Some of them would have a better life in our prison system than they did in the country they came from.

by too old for it

... I asked a college educated friend of mine (who prefered "black" to any hyphenated tomfoolery) why people used "axed".

He said they were just lazy.

Hmmm?

by oz_media

"Day without Immigrants", well I almost got out my bucket and spaade to head south as there woul dbe nobody in America. Then I read your post and you referred to illegal immigrnts.

First of all, while I agree that illegal immigrants are a major proble, in the US, I have to laugh at everyone's reactions to multiculturalism in the US.

Yuo guys haven't even begun to be multicultural. When in the US sure you see the token chinese of Japanese guy, the token East Indian etc. But you really only have an influx of Spanish/Mexican immigrants.

try visiting Canada, Vancouver especially, you wil see every immigrant known to man, and some you may need to look up on Wikopedia. Compared to Vancouver, the US is not a very culturally diverse country at all, but all we hear about is immmigrants in the US. YOu need to REALY start to separate immigrants and illegal immigrants/aliens.

America without mmigrants? You wouldn't be posting here and nor would 99% of the other peers, you are all immigrants to the USA,with exception to any native Americans here, I don't care when you were born.

To hear how multicultural you are, then to see what a MINORITY group immigrants really are there is a laugh. Again, yes you have a huge flow of mexican immmigrants, but that doesn't really make you international or multicultural.

I thought it was funny though to see a dozen Mexicans standing outside the hardware store waiting for cash jobs. So I suppose when you need a garden dug they are alright but after that you don't want them around anymore.

remember, "Don't feed the bears", if you stopped takign advantage of the cheap labour they wouldn't be so eager to enter your country.

by jamesrl

While I don't disagree with Oz about Canada being more multicultural (which is in my opinion a benefit) than the US, thats not the point.

Canada can only take so many immigrants per year (about 250,000 a year). Many more people want to come, so there is an extensive waiting list. Some qualified applicants wait 3-4-5 years to come. Others come on a visitors visa and then dissapear into the underground economy.

Like Los Angeles, we have thousands of illegal immigrants building houses, acting as domestics, cutting lawns and cleaning hotels. These people are often paid less than a legal immigrant or citizen would be paid.

But perhaps we shouldn't be so hasty to let the illegals stay. Some of those jobs would be gladly taken up by some people drawing unemployment or welfare and that would help the economy and lower the tax burden.

Some of those people waiting to get in legally are the entrepreneur class where they come in with at least 100,000$ to invest in a business. Why should they wait?

James

by jdclyde

I have read the MANY posts OZ has had, and this could not POSSIBLY be true or he would never have said many of the things he has and continues to say about the US.

There ARE no illigals in Canada, because you openly welcome all people and have a smooth system for all the world because EVERYONE wants to move there.

There is no crime or underground.

There is no unemployment.

How you can say these things with a straight face is beyond me! ;\

[/dripping sarcasm]

by jdclyde

No one in this post that I saw was saying anything about getting rid of immigrants, and ALL that I was were agaisnt illegal immingranst.

(of course there are never any illegal aliens in Canada, right?)

No one in this post was bragging about how multicultureal we are, or how great the mix is, so this little whine is really out of place. We are not looking to have an even mix of every shape and size, but an opportunity for anyone that wants it. If you think this is something extra special, well don't hurt yourself patting yourself on the back.

The people that WANT to come here, can, provided they do it legally. Most are in favor of fixing this system to become legal as well (including me).

Of course as per YOUR never ending rants, this is all about nothing because NO ONE in the WORLD wants to go to the US.

As for the title needing to be changed, IF you had been paying attention to the news, it was NOT just the illegal aliens that were protesting, (in theory) but having support from people that DID go through the legal process as well. Ask the people that experienced stores that were closed if they were all owned by illegals or not. But logic would take away from just one more chance to go off on this bash.

Can anyone else believe OZ did not make a single statement how this is somehow the fault of Bush? How did that ever get left out?

Hope you enjoyed your self-rightious laugh that you had all alone.

by mickster269

No one above has said anything about LEGAL immigrants. I would dare say that 99 % of all people residing in the US had ancestors that came from a different country. Mine certainly did.

But my immigrant relatives came to the USA LEGALLY. They filled out the paperwork, waited in line, and went through channels to arrive and live here legally.

That is where we are drawing the line.

And as for your multi-cultural rant, I suggest you visit New York City, Chicago, San Fransico, Seattle, Or a dozen other major metropolitian cities. They've had multi-cultural neighborhoods before Vancouver even exisited. Our whole country is multicultural, since every single one of us can trace relatives back to a country outside of the USA.

Even the "Native" Americans came from somewhere else, either by Siberia, a raft from Asia, or a ...uhh spaceship. Since the "cradle of Man" is currently proposed to be in Africa, everyone on this continent can say thier forefathers "immigrated".

Sorry, Oz- but I think your comments are a bit out of line here.

by tryten

Hispanics ARE the MAJORITY GROUP in Texas!!! Followed by white, black, asian. I am white in Texas...I dont get to see any benefits from being a minority. Maybe all the white people in Texas should have a "No White Person" day and not work for a day or two until white people in Texas get minority benefits such as Equal Opportunity Employment. Nothing like being handed a job because you are a minority, even though there sometimes IS someone who IS a majority group member and is more qualified.

by oz_media

"Day without Immigrants", well I almost got out my bucket and spaade to head south as there woul dbe nobody in America. Then I read your post and you referred to illegal immigrnts.

First of all, while I agree that illegal immigrants are a major proble, in the US, I have to laugh at everyone's reactions to multiculturalism in the US.

Yuo guys haven't even begun to be multicultural. When in the US sure you see the token chinese of Japanese guy, the token East Indian etc. But you really only have an influx of Spanish/Mexican immigrants.

try visiting Canada, Vancouver especially, you wil see every immigrant known to man, and some you may need to look up on Wikopedia. Compared to Vancouver, the US is not a very culturally diverse country at all, but all we hear about is immmigrants in the US. YOu need to REALY start to separate immigrants and illegal immigrants/aliens.

America without mmigrants? You wouldn't be posting here and nor would 99% of the other peers, you are all immigrants to the USA,with exception to any native Americans here, I don't care when you were born.

To hear how multicultural you are, then to see what a MINORITY group immigrants really are there is a laugh. Again, yes you have a huge flow of mexican immmigrants, but that doesn't really make you international or multicultural.

I thought it was funny though to see a dozen Mexicans standing outside the hardware store waiting for cash jobs. So I suppose when you need a garden dug they are alright but after that you don't want them around anymore.

remember, "Don't feed the bears", if you stopped takign advantage of the cheap labour they wouldn't be so eager to enter your country.

by jdclyde

to overthrow the corrupt Mexican government that continues to make Mexico such a horrible place to live?

Or is it time for the people of Mexico to stand up and instead of running away from the problem, make Mexico a respectable place to live?

I just know that I don't have a solution for it.

by tig2

I have no problem with Mexico doing whatever Mexico needs to do to promote a better standard of living. I DO have a problem with the expectation that seems to be out there that I am somehow responsible for dealing with their problem.

I am an American whose tax dollars should be supporting America. In other words, while I can intellecutalize about what Mexico should do, I don't think it is my job to do it for them.

(and no, jd; I did not think you were headed down the path of "let's fix them". I am just trying to keep work assignments where they belong... :) )

by jdclyde

and the protests didn't take place until evening.

There is a fairly large hispanic population in Grand Rapids.

With a 7% unemployment rate in Michigan right now, it seems no one was stupid enough to risk their jobs over this because there are so many people that would scoop up that free job real quick.

No violent protests that I heard of, and everything was pretty low key.

Biting the hand that feeds you is never a good idea, and there are plenty of people that lost their jobs because of skipping work for the LAST demonstration.

And the employers are fighting paying unemployment benifits to the people that were fired for refusing to come into work. Refusing work is NEVER looked upon favorably by the labor department.

I personally didn't see a single store closed, nor ANY sign that this was even taking place.

We DO get a lot of migrant workers here in Michigan too. Every year they come up to do the fields and bust their a$$'s off in that hot sun all day long, the whole family. Every winter they are back to Texas or Mexico.

by jamesrl

There have been a few deportations lately. Typically they give the order and enforce it months later, and some people try to hide in between.

Last month there was the case of the man from Portugal and the woman from Brazil, both illegals, who married and had a child in Canada. The rule states that you must be deported to your country of origin and these people were crying in front of the TV camera about how cruel the government was forcing them apart. Turns out they had been scheming all along and left the day before their scheduled deportation and both went to Portugal. I shook my headabout how many media were duped.

Last week there was the case of a couple with kids who dissapeared when they got their order. The enforcers discovered that although they moved the kids were at the same school, so they went to the school and detained the kids. They asked the kids to call their parents and then handed the phone to the immigration officers who said, come down here so we can serve you the papers. That might have been slightly over the edge, but I understand the frustration of the officers.

We don't have as many illegals in Canada as the US, even as a percentage basis, as they have to either fly or come across the US border. But they exist. I remember the refugee scam - Portugese people claiming to be Jehovah's Witnesses because apparently JWs were persecuted in Portugal. That loophole was closed, others still exist.

Unemployment in Canada has been higher than the US for some time. One of the reasons why the Canadian economy is doing better than the US in terms of growth is that it had been less productive and below the US economy, so it was easierr to make big gains.

Crime is less, but it isn't non-existent. We do export a lot of pot, and grow ops are still criminal here.

There definately is an underground economy, both of illegal workers (contruction in Toronto estimated to be 25% illegals) and Canadian citizens who work part time in underground (tradesmen).

What probably ticks both Oz and I off are the arguments that US makes that Canada is some kind of haven for terrorists. Fox, no matter that they have gone on record apologizing in the past for this, still continues to allow commentators to say that some of the 9/11 terrorists came through Canada. They know its a lie and they repeat it. The US congress just yesterday published a report about terrorists in Canada, and just happened to neglect the fact that the persons of interest they mentioned were already in custody of Canadian law enforcement under national security provisions. I resent the hell out of those baseless self serving political bullsh!t accusations.

But I can't lie, we aren't perfect.

James

by jdclyde

Oz is doing it enough for the both of you! :D

I personally resent the hell out of ALL the baseless self serving political BS spouted everytime all politican WORLD WIDE opens their mouths.

by geekchic

and of all places Texas...some of the smaller Mexican restaurants were closed but the stores were still full of customers, gas lines were still there and traffic was still a pain.

I think that this "rally" is only hurting their cause. I for one have nothing against people from other countries coming to the United States to take part in the "American dream". However, I DO have a problem with people coming here illegally.

Most of the people that live in the US had ancestors that were immigrants but they came here and legally became citizens.

I think that thing that bothers me the most is that during the rallies you primarily see flags from other countries being waved and people wearing t-shirts from their home countries. If they really want to win the hearts and support of Americans and become citizens, shouldn't they be waving the U.S. flag??? Plus, I have talked to a few of the "illegals" right here in our town and they say that since they are working and paying taxes that they should be allowed to become citizens. But, when I ask "how are you paying taxes when you can't have a social security number unless you are an American citizen?", they walk away...

I for one am tired of paying taxes that support illegals medical bills and education. Not to mention constantly worrying about being hit by a driver with no license or insurance.

by tryten

Which is HIGHLY odd considering its the Hub City for illegals entering the country.

Also odd because Hispanics make up nearly 35% of the population in Houston...that makes them the majority group.

The only odd thing is what a friend of mine told me about the grass farm he works at. 6 workers did not show today so they were immediately replaced with 6 "Legal" workers. Some people just dont know how to keep quiet.

by cactus pete

If the largest group in Houston accounts for 35% of the population, they are not the majority.