Instructor-led or self-study?
Hi all, I have decided to obtain the Windows 2000 MCSE certification. I need some advice on whether to invest some money (quite a bit of money)for an instructor-led course or do it by self-study. I have already obtained my A+ and MCP in Win 98.
I get mixed opinions from different people, some say i am better off doing it myself, but then instructor-led course would probably save me some time, and have someone who know the subjects, to guide me when required.
But then there one thing that I’m a bit concern about, is that if all the networks the instructor have ever administered are those computers in the training centre, would that be enough? OR can I trust Microsoft own evaluation – meaning the training centre must have met certain standard to become or stay as a MCTEC.
BTW, I am over 30’s and am working in a call centre as a 1st line tech support technician giving advice and troubleshooting all PC’s related problems, for customer who purchased PCs from the retail side of this big company.( a company that does not treat its staff with respect and support, and pay crap wages).
I have been here for 2 yrs and have reach the top of the ladder in term of responsibility/position/salary. I am very interested in networking, and am planning to do Network+, then proceed to MCSE 2000. I know age may count against me as I’m over 30’s, thus keen to get some experience and certification to get me a foot in the door to start my networking career,
So, instructor-led or self study? all advice welcome. Thanks
Ps: Sorry if you have seen this posting on another board cos’ i mistakenly post to the network admin board. Sorry.
