General discussion


IP Route

By dilligaffer ·
I just received instruction for our Internet Failover. We currently run 2 routers and for the 1st I have instructions "no ip route 3" my only confusion is what is the "3" referencing? Is this dealing with load balancing?
Any information is much appreciated.

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

by Joseph Moore In reply to IP Route

That is weird, AFAIK.
Here is a link to the IP ROUTE syntax for a Cisco IOS router:

Normally, it would be NO IP ROUTE, then the IP, and then the subnet mask, and THEN possibly a gateway, THEN the distance. The gateway is, apparently, optional (I don't know WHY the gateway would be optional, but I am also not a hard-core Cisco guy!).

So, it looks like they just forgot to put in the subnet mask in what they sent you. The "3" is the distance. So, if you have a Class A address space (and since it is then that sure sounds like Class A), I think the command should really be:

hope this helps

Collapse -

by dilligaffer In reply to IP Route

Actually I may have confused you it does read as follows: no ip route 3 - now someone suggested cost metric but I don't think this is the case.

Collapse -

by james.longson In reply to IP Route

The 3 is the metric. The cost of the route. Say you are running EIGRP. EIGRP has a metric of 90. A static route has a metric of 1. Therefore the static route will have a higher prority than EIGRP. Normally you you set the static route with a metric of 250. The static route will be used as a last resort option if EIGRP fails. You have to enable IP classes as well.

Hope this helps

Collapse -

by dilligaffer In reply to

Thank you so much - I did find information on cost metric so I was on the right track - however your explaination is much easier to follow! Poster rated this answer.

Collapse -

by dilligaffer In reply to IP Route

This question was closed by the author

Related Discussions

Related Forums