General discussion

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #4294302

    Is Traditional Coding Still Relevant in the Age of AI and Low-Code Develop.

    by scotcbrown0 ·

    Tags: 

    With the rise of AI-powered tools and low-code/no-code platforms, software development is becoming more accessible to non-programmers. Many businesses are now building applications without writing extensive code, which raises an interesting question—will traditional coding eventually become obsolete?

    As a developer, I often wonder about the long-term impact of these technologies. Will advanced AI models take over complex programming tasks? Or will traditional coding always be essential for performance, security, and customization?

    Have you worked with low-code or AI-assisted development? Do you think it’s the future, or is it just a trend?
    Would love to hear your thoughts!

You are posting a reply to: Is Traditional Coding Still Relevant in the Age of AI and Low-Code Develop.

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our Community FAQs for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.

All Comments

  • Author
    Replies
    • #4294389
      Avatar photo

      Reply To: Is Traditional Coding Still Relevant in the Age of AI and Low-Code Develop.

      by rproffitt ·

      In reply to Is Traditional Coding Still Relevant in the Age of AI and Low-Code Develop.

      Yes. At some point the project will need someone that knows not to subscript/index a pointer.

      • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 5 days ago by Avatar photorproffitt.
      • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 5 days ago by Avatar photorproffitt.
    • #4294558

      Reply To: Is Traditional Coding Still Relevant in the Age of AI and Low-Code Develop.

      by garloom26 ·

      In reply to Is Traditional Coding Still Relevant in the Age of AI and Low-Code Develop.

      I believe AI will most certainly leave a lasting impact on development, but will not completely eradicate the need for manual coding. Important tasks will still need people to go in and check code for obvious vulnerabilities or oversights the AI might have missed. I think of it as more of speeding up the process, rather than replacment.

Viewing 1 reply thread