And I only saw what was effectively a Throw Away Line in a Report on M$ and their Word Processor legal Case.
[i]Since the i4i case, Microsoft has announced plans to appeal the ruling, starting with an emergency motion that would avert having to post a bond for millions of dollars in damages. If successful, the motion would also cover the $40 million the judge imposed for “trial misconduct” against Microsoft’s attorneys.[/i]
What I found interesting was the last sentence
[i]If successful, the motion would also cover the $40 million the judge imposed for “trial misconduct” against Microsoft’s attorneys.[/i]
So what I wonder did M$ Legal Team do to warrant a $40 Million Fine for [b]Trial Misconduct?[/b]
Much more importantly do they think that because they are representing M$ that they don’t have to play by the rules that the rest of us do?
Or hasn’t anyone told them that Peeving off the Judge hearing the case you are defending isn’t cleaver?
I wasn’t overly concerned about the original Legal Action but I did find that last Paragraph very interesting and all I can say is they got exactly what they deserved. :^0
Col 0:-)
