General discussion

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #2296981

    Processor

    Locked

    by ebgasper ·

    We are currently about to purchase four computers and one of my peers recommended computers with the Intel Celeron processor. The computers will be running Windows XP operating system. Can anyone provide me with any pros and cons about this processor.

All Comments

  • Author
    Replies
    • #2686678

      Reply To: Processor

      by oz_media ·

      In reply to Processor

      eleron is basically designed for low end low cost machines, generally student emachines or limited use home machines for general email and web surfing.

      A PIII will offer split level2 caching and much faster performance due to higher Front Side Bus (FSB)clocking speeds than Celeron procesors.

      A Pentium 4 has a faster FSB still making i tmore suitable for powerdesktops and mulitmedia processing.

      Bottom line, you’ll get exctly what you pay for, Celeron will lead to numerous crashes, slow network performace than Pentium processors.

      Windows XP is has EXTREMELY high resource needs,it is a slow running OS if you don’t have LOTS of RAM and a fast FSB. Celeron with XP would be a scary thought in for any business application. I worked at a company where I recommended a certain line of PC’s, they took my advice but then went out and bought almost a dozen Celerom drive machines, there are still two left that I have isolated from the network, the others went home with users for the kids at a good price, they required more maintenaance than anything I’ve ever used and were CONSTANTLY crashing and causing peoblems.

      They are NOT designed for business use, do yourself a favour, SPEND the Pentium money you will NEVER look back and regret it, unless you go with Celerons of course.

      • #2686677

        Reply To: Processor

        by oz_media ·

        In reply to Reply To: Processor

        Lastly I would avoid no name white boxes. I have been there done that and now only deal with OEM’s, mainly Compaq EVO or IBM Intellistations. They are designed for business, they have great support, 5-year on site warranties, a better support center than retail machines and all of your drivers and updates are found at a single site, often as a single file.

        Buy your computer ONCE and have them work for years. OR Buy your computers and upgrade each year, try to find compatible drivers and BIOS updates, search high and low for parts manufacturers who you can MAIL your harware to for possible repair or replacement.

        It’s your choice, time and money, spend now save later.

      • #2673007

        Reply To: Processor

        by ebgasper ·

        In reply to Reply To: Processor

        Thank you very much for your response. Because of your informative response, we decided not to purchase the computer.

    • #2686662

      Reply To: Processor

      by thechas ·

      In reply to Processor

      It depends on how you are using your systems.

      For general home and office use, Celeron CPUs will work just fine.

      For CAD work, video editing, or high end games, you will want the additional power of a P4.

      Chas

      • #2686660

        Reply To: Processor

        by thechas ·

        In reply to Reply To: Processor

        Just a side thought,

        Many of the name brand systems with Celeron processors are “price point” systems.

        They tend to have on-board or integrated video.
        On-Board video will slow down system performance much more than the difference between a Celeron and a Pentium CPU.

        Chas

      • #2673008

        Reply To: Processor

        by ebgasper ·

        In reply to Reply To: Processor

        Thank you very much for your response. Because of your informative response, we decided not to purchase the computer.

    • #2686630

      Reply To: Processor

      by juergen hartl ·

      In reply to Processor

      If you are considering a Celeron processor then price seems to be an important consideration. In that case I would look into buying AMD based systems. A comparable priced system will always outperform a Celeron based system!
      In general previous answers are correct, however it is more important to have more memory (at least 256Mb) and an adequate grafics card than pure precessor power. Any processor with more than 1.2Ghz will run XP in a acceptable manner.

      • #2673009

        Reply To: Processor

        by ebgasper ·

        In reply to Reply To: Processor

        Thank you very much for your response. Because of your informative response, we decided not to purchase the computer.

    • #2673040

      Reply To: Processor

      by mr-rich ·

      In reply to Processor

      If you are considering Intel processors, stay away from Celeron. Some Celerons have cache *not much)and some do not. XP is a complicated OS and need taken care of to operate properly. Down the road Celeron will definitely give you problems. PIII & P4 are ok if you have money. AMD based systems will outperform Intel’s Celeron and most P3 & P4 systems. I personally have a P4 2ghz and 2 Athlon 1.3ghz system. Both Atlons out perform the P4 in all software process. I spent less than $700 for ea Athlon and approx $2000 for the P4. This is my opinion, I am into video editing and gaming, so I need the best performance. Of cours I just purchase 2 new processor for my Athlon systems, that makes another $200 invested. And my P4, sitting in the closet with my Amiga and Franklin.

      • #2673010

        Reply To: Processor

        by ebgasper ·

        In reply to Reply To: Processor

        Thank you very much for your response. Because of your informative response, we decided not to purchase the computer.

    • #2673011

      Reply To: Processor

      by ebgasper ·

      In reply to Processor

      Thanks everyone for your responses. Based on the input received, we’ve decided to not purchase the computers.

    • #2673006

      Reply To: Processor

      by ebgasper ·

      In reply to Processor

      This question was closed by the author

Viewing 5 reply threads