Can you share your knowledge and understanding of the US constitution, a bit?
I was wondering, elsewhere, about laws that exempt themselves from judicial review… I feel that’s a very messed up thing, but do you have a take on it from the constitutional view? Or from the perspective of the historical/ideological/philosophical basis of the constitution? I know the supreme court can scrap an unconstitutional law, but obviously, if exempting a law from judicial review was blatantly and precedentially unconstitutional, even Lieberman wouldn’t bother trying.
The rest of you are welcome too, obviously…
