Our forums are currently in maintenance mode and the ability to post is disabled. We will be back up and running as soon as possible. Thanks for your patience!

General discussion


RAID 5 Performance

By jlbpotter ·
I have a server running W2K Server with 4 HDDs configured in a hardware RAID 5. One of my drives failed and I am currently running on 3 drives. This server has a SQL 2000 database on it. I am not going to be able to replace the HDD for 2 or 3 days. Can I expect much of a performance issue or slow downs running the server this way? Thanks

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

by jschein In reply to RAID 5 Performance

You shouldn't see much of a performance issue as that drive was mainly used for redundancy. However, not having 4 or 24 hour support leaves alot to the imagination on a server.

Most of my servers have 4-6 drives and I have actually had 1 drive fail, then a few hours later, another fail... (Bad drives). If you have 4 and are down to three, just be concerned, if another fails you will have a few issues arise... performance, errors, etc.

Possibly this could be a pro / con meeting with the bosses to buy updated support for your servers just for this reason alone.

Collapse -

by jlbpotter In reply to

Poster rated this answer.

Collapse -

by jlbpotter In reply to RAID 5 Performance

That is what I thought but I just wanted to hear from someone else. By the way I have a P.O signed for 3 more HDDs for this server so that we have some backups. Thanks for your time.

Collapse -

by jlbpotter In reply to RAID 5 Performance

This question was closed by the author

Related Discussions

Related Forums