General discussion


retirement schedule

By longennamer ·
The company I work for recently had to replace all their computers at one time because they all were beyond usefullness. I have been asked to develop a plan so that doesn't happen again by replacing a portion of the computers and servers every year. Does anyone have suggestions on retirement schedule for computers, servers, and anything else I should keep in mind.


This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

by Curacao_Dejavu In reply to retirement schedule

Install terminal servers.
you can manage them remotely, all servers on a central location, can deploy programs instantly (only install the program once) scalabitity, only administrators can install the programs.

for information check,,,

You can use even 486's as clients, or thinclient device for under $300.


(if that doesn't work you can always sent the "old" pc's to me :) )

Collapse -

by Cactus Pete In reply to retirement schedule

Generally, we buy the best server we can afford for a particular application, and only replace it when absolutely necessary. They are basically on their own schedules.

For the workstations, we try to replace about 1/3 each year. We, as I suspect most would, start the rotation with the money makers of the firm, and the officers. They can determine otherwise, of course.

Management gets to decide which departments go a what time, or they get to allow 1/3 of each department to go each year.

Should this be an across the board [each department gets to replace 1/3 each year] we give them a certain amount of credits they can use to pick out different types of packages; a desktop with a PDA, a laptop, two desktops, etc.

Basically, we offer to guide their use of technology, but leave the decision to who gets what to each director/manager. With everyone involved, things seem to be generally happier.

Good luck.

Collapse -

by timwalsh In reply to retirement schedule

Several things to take into account:

Obviously the biggest is budget. What budget is available for replacement of capital equipment?

Next is depreciation - In the US there are strict rules that govern how a company can depreciate capital equipment. Does it make finanacial sense to replace equipment the hasn't been fully depreciated? Rules for office equipment (to include computers) state a 5-year depreciation period.

Obsolescence/recovery of costs - With the rate that technology changes, most computers are considered obsolete after about 3 years. Also unless you have en extremely high-end system, resale value after 3 years is usually not worth the effort involved in trying to recover costs.

However, just because a computer is considered obsolete and has no resale value doesn't mean it isn't still useful. Your actual replacement schedule will probably depend on whether you must make use of your computers throughout a specified depreciation period or whether you have the luxury of replacing computers based solely on obsolescence. Your plan should be such that at the end of a replacement cycle (3 yrs, 5 yrs, or whatever makes sense), all computers have been replaced once. Then you start over again. This is the easy part.

The next part of the plan is harder and usually involves office politics. Once you have determined your schedule, you now need to determine WHO gets the newest computers. Is the Boss going to insist that he have the latest, greatest every year? Do you have have engineers whose work requires that they have the latest, greatest every year? Will you have users squawk loudly and continuously because their computers get changed every year (especially when it is only changed for a "newer" computer, but not the newest)? Will the same computers stay with the same users throughout the computer's lifecycle? That is something you will have to figure out with your management's input.

Collapse -

by timwalsh In reply to

Something else to keep in mind is managing the lifecycle plan. Depending on your company's organization, it may be easier to manage the cycle by scheduling replacements along department lines rather than just replacing the same percentage of computers every year. Using this method would mean that some years you may end up replacing more computers than other years. The benefit is that everyone within a department has the same generation of computers, which eases both management of the lifecycle plan as well as user support.

All of the above relates to desktop computers. Replacement plans for servers can be a stickier situation, and have greater implications for your company. Most uses for servers do not need the latest generation of CPU. Also, depending on the function of a server, transferring that function from an old server to a new server can be troublesome. With servers, the old clich? of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" is still very true. With servers, it's usually better to approach them on an individual basis, replacing them only when they run out of steam, can no longer perform their assigned function efficiently, and cannot be economically upgraded.

Hope this helps.

Related Discussions

Related Forums