Discussion Locked

Steve Irwin

0 helpful
236 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

It was little sad to hear the news that Steve Irwin died after being speared in the chest by a Sting Ray's barbed tail.

I am not a regular watcher of his TV shows and neither a fan of his, but I have been impressed with his energy and enthusiasm.

His fans sure would miss him.

He almost seemed immortal :-(

236 replies

by jamesrl

When I saw the footage of him holding his baby in one arm and feeding a croc with another. This wasn't over a fence or anything - this was on bare ground. I saw a clip of him defending himself - saying he is a total professional etc.

This is hubris and bad judgement and frankly exploitive. Does anyone not think he did it for publicity? What reason is there to have a baby within a few feet of a hungry croc?

I am sad to see anyone die. The news report I saw said it was the first death from Sting Ray in Australia in 60 Years.

But don't you have to wonder, Steve had been so lucky for so long, was he "due" to run out?

I am not suggesting he wasn't skilled - clearly to handle thousands of deadly snakes and hundreds of crocs up close, you have to be skilled. But even those with skill sometimes run afoul of fate. Roy Horn raised a tiger from a cub, and it still attacked him. The more death defying things you do, the more likely you are to facing an untimely end.

James

by onbliss

...that feeding of the croc was one such act of Steve's. Putting one in harm's way is one thing, and putting a baby is another.

So your impression on him, was it moulded by that one act of his or were you just less impressed with him in general?

by jdclyde

it only took that one incredibly selfish and stupid act to show James exactly what kind of man Irwin was, and he didn't like what he saw.

Just a guess.

by jamesrl

That one act said so much.That and the fact he defended that act some time afterwards.

That act says alot about a person, and their judgement. I admired his ability with Crocs. But as you say, putting yourself at risk is one thing.

No one is perfect. Steve could have slipped on a wet patch of grass and gone down on his butt. If it was just him getting hurt, thats one thing. Taking a baby into a croc pen, thats nuts. Its reckless and pointless.

James

by old guy

Like most others I felt he was a little over the top but he was funny and he was really informative. Sure his decision about feeding the croc while holding his child was pretty stupid but over all I thought he was pretty cool. He definitely got excited about what he was doing and seemed to really love what he was doing. I hate it for his family but sounds like he went out doing what he loved.

by techexec2

I was appalled that Steve Irwin held his baby while feeding a huge crocodile (and it is like M. Jackson holding his baby over the rail). But, I didn't think of Steve as selfish per se. I think it was just the way he lived his life. He willingly handled 12 foot crocodiles with huge powerful jaws, and poisonous snakes and spiders so venomous that one bite would kill. That's just the way he approached his life. So, it is no surprise and completely consistent that he would carry his baby while feeding a croc. It's something I would never do because I view it differently than he did. I view it as a foolish needless risk to an important human life.

To me, it's no surprise that he died due to an animal attack. But, it is a very sad ending to an extraordinary life. I feel really bad for his wife and children.

The only good thing about his untimely death is that he lived his life on his own terms and without fear.

edit: spelling typo

by tink!

That one incident unfortunately made the media, but you have to realize that we are all human and make errors in judgement quite often. He himself was very comfortable around crocs and understood them enough to know when he was and wasn't in danger. With all his experience the danger level is muted, unlike any of us who'd have our hairs prickling at the site of one behind a steel fence. Therefore he, in his heart, and having total confidence in his skills, felt comfortable having his child in the presence of the croc. After all the hype from the media and the public afterwards he may have realized how badly it looked. But I don't think it changed how he felt about it. How do you think daredevil's children follow in their parent's footsteps?

by hal 9000

He himself freely admitted to being with Crocks ever since he was [b]Hatched From the Egg[/b] and after all this was in his backyard it's not as if he went out of his way to do this.

To me it was nothing more than a proud father with his son introducing him to his life as it will be. His daughter here runs adds for the family business Australia Zoo where she says things like come and visit My Pets. I notice that those adds for AU Zoo have been pulled since his death though.

Col

by jdclyde

Was at the laudrymat cleaning sleeping bags and I saw flash "The Late Steve Irwin" but couldn't hear anything about it.

Looked it up later, and it seems real odd of all the animals that he got up and dangerous with, that the stingray would be the one to take him out. Sad.

My boys watched his show all the time. I personally prefered the south Park tribute to him.

RIP Steve.

by hal 9000

Never do anything for your children.

When he died he was filming something for his daughter not for a show of any kind it was something that is daughter had asked him to do.

Now if he had of ignored his daughters request he would still be alive today. But what I think is funny is that of all the people in his life it will be his daughter who takes it the best and understands that [b]S H I T Happens![/b] Just get on with your life and not look back.

Col

by jdclyde

women! If you use the secret decoder ring, that word translates directly to "trouble".

Yeah, the decoder ring gives you short hand for the messages, so? :)

by maecuff

especially since he is leaving small children. But it's not a shock that he was killed by an animal. I think it was just a matter of 'when'.

by onbliss

...those were the thoughts that ran through my wife's mind. She thought how little his kids were 3yr and 8yr olds.

by maecuff

but I will never understand why people put themselves in harms way (deliberately) when they have children to raise. Kinda like the people who attempt to climb Mt. Everest, die, and leave their wives to raise their children on their own. It just seems selfish to me.

by jdclyde

or "What"?

I always thought it was more an matter of WHAT would get him, not when it would. both are valid, and they intersected just the other day.

Just leaves us with the "Why".

by mjd420nova

Whether we drive a car, work on scaffolds, wash windows from a ladder, or even walk down a flight of stairs, just about everything we do is full of risks that are life threatening.. The outcome of these everyday things are in most cases uneventful, BUT.. How we choose to conduct ourselves are weighed one against another and applied thru experience. Many, many things we do are passed off by all as not dangerous because we've done it before and nothing happened. That doesn't make it any less dangerous but taints our outlook on life in general. Who would have thought that a scared sting ray would be placed in that particular piece of water when Steve passed by. Just like when we all cross thru a light controlled intersection in our cars. All it takes is one drunk driver and we'd all be pushing up daisies. My prayers go to his family and friends and I pray that we all learn a lifes lesson from this unfortunate event.

by onbliss

... Buddha. For leaving his wife and young son, and going in search of enlightenment. But I guess it is something that comes from deep within a person. Some of us who disagree might call it selfish, but to that person it could be harrowing to not do so.

edited: grammar, spelling, clarity

by jdclyde

A hunter first of all would not place themselves in such peril in the first place. Safety Safety Safety.

Second, no hunter would HOLD their child while in a dangerous situation.

He has more in common with M Jackson than he does with a valid hunter. (hanging the baby over the rail, remember?)

by onbliss

..I remember Jackson's episode.
Is'nt Safety a relative thing? What would appear to be safe to you, would not appear safe to me (a non-hunter). You see my point.

by hal 9000

He had backup in that pen so if he had of fallen which I might add he didn't there was backup in place to prevent anything bad happening.

While it's true that Pictures don't lie it's also true that some times they don't tell the entire truth either. If all you could see was that one 30 Second Sound Bite and where to use that to judge the guy attitude on you would be sadly mistaken. In the entire time of AU Zoo there has only been one accident where anyone was hurt and even that one was marked down to accidental happenings. No one was at fault and the person hurt is still working at AU Zoo.

I'm not defending the guy but I can also understand where he was coming from and at the feeding times here there is never just one person in the pen there are always several in there to protect the one feeding the animal and all have food to lure the animal away if necessary. To this point in time there has never been an incident at AU Zoo where anyone has been injured at Crock Feeding Time. One Snake Bite but never a Crock Bite.

Col

by jdclyde

How long do you think it will be before that video is released? There are plenty of people out there that "eat that up".

Just like you can rent the video (don't remember the guys name) that lived amung the bears and defended them, only to have him AND his stupid girlfriend get eaten by one? They SAY that you don't SEE anything, but you hear it. why would someone rent a video to listen to someone get eaten alive by a bear?

I will pass either way. Just like I didn't watch any of the beheading videos, and have no intention of it.

by maecuff

that people view that sort of thing as entertainment. I'm with you. I will not watch it.

by onbliss

...viewed a picture of three Indonesia girls whose heads were severed by some funamentalists. I was reading some discussion forum and somebody had just linked the image right into their post. I hate that when people do it instead of providing links.

I just don't have the heart to hear or see sounds and pictures of such nature.

by maecuff

it's an indication that you DO have a heart. I can't fathom people being able to see or hear such things without feeling sick or saddened by it.

by leee

The film is 'Grizzly Man,' and no, you don't hear the audio, period. In fact, Werner Herzog (the already-famous director) listened the tape and said that no one should be allowed to hear it, and urged its destruction.

Tim Treadwell (the grizzly guy) was infinitely stupider than Steve Irwin. Irwin was zany, but he respected wildlife. Treadwell anthropomorphized them and assumed them to be as docile as toy teddy bears instead of the one-ton, wild, clawed animals they are. And it was an excellent film, too - if nothing else, it showed what a complete and delusional fool this guy was.

by jdclyde

I had heard that first was him getting torn apart while his girlfriend just stood there, and then game her turn because she was too stupid to run when Treadwell became the first course, AND that you could hear it all.

Are there maybe some versions that have the audio?

Don't answer, as I have no intention of viewing either version. Thanks anyways.

by techexec2

I watched the beheading videos on purpose in an effort to better understand who the enemy is. It gave me a whole new perspective on the "war on terror" that I could never have gotten any other way. Now, not only do I THINK, I also viscerally KNOW the kind of people we are fighting and why soft measures will never work. Never.

People who advocate negotiation, reasoning, or withdrawal from the middle east should watch them. They will never think that way again.

I have no interest in the Steve Irwin video. That's just a tragic end to an extraordinary life.

by jdclyde

[i]"People who advocate negotiation, reasoning, or withdrawal from the middle east should watch them. They will never think that way again."[/i]

These people actually think that we DESERVE this, and we DESERVED 911 and we DESERVE all the other reasons "everyone hates us".

The apologists are completely disconnected from reality and don't realize you can't reason with insane people that are living just to die.

Yeah, they will even tell you about the brave "freedom fighters" of Hezbollah/Hamas and all the like.

by onbliss

...see the interview where he defended himself. Well that incident had made an impact on you.

by Member 25348569

but, like James, I had this guy marked down as a dangerous fool after I'd seen [b]this[/b] little incident.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3365999.stm

Irwin: "But I would be considered a bad parent if I didn't teach my children to be croc-savvy."

Mrs Irwin said her baby enjoyed the experience. "When I put him back in the pram he had big eyes and he was smiling and it was a wonderful sensory experience for him. He dug it," she said.

The kiddy was [b]one month[/b] old. Idiots, the pair of them.

Yes, he was a fun character to watch but...

Neil

by fungus-among-us

"I personally prefered the South Park tribute to him."

LMAO

"I'm gonna catch that croc and stick my thumb up his bum!"

P.S. Mrs Irwin must not have the "instincts" of a human mother... it must be more like how CROCS treat their young. Protect the eggs... once they hatch, it's a free meal.

by onbliss

...on your comment about Mrs Irwin saying her baby enjoyed the experience.

As far as Irwin himself, apart from being fun to watch, can't help from wondering how would a kid grow up when he receives a python for his 6th birthday and catches a croc when he is just 9 yr old. Definitely Irwin was influenced by his parents' conservation efforts.

by jdclyde

to have conservation efforts without being a raving loon?

In the states, they would have said he was ADD and put him in prozac.

by jamesrl

I am a Canadian, and therefore, we have a different political context. I am a lifelong member of the conservative party, but primarily a fiscal conservative rather than a social conservative.

Will we disagree on foreign policy - inevitably yes. But if you looked at a spectrum of areas, you might find we might actually agree more than we disagree.

James

by onbliss

As I was reading the discussion forum, and as I scrolled down the pictures suddenly were there. So what makes you think I DO have the heart? It will be an interesting to how you came to this opinion, as I have never gone searching for such pictures or sound bites before.

As far as the feelings, it is just a mixture of feelings. Can't put one or two words to it. And if one mulls over it, it just gets horrible.

by jdclyde

NEVER point a loaded weapon at anyone you are not planning on shooting (for self defense).

ASSUME EVERY weapon is loaded, all the time.

------------------------------

If you remember those two simple rules, hunting is safer than driving down the highway.

As for prey, if you are hunting something dangerous or there are dangerous animals in the area you are hunting, you are never alone, and you have at least one person with a heavy firearm ready at all times looking for nothing but defense against the dangerous animals.

People that go bear hunting for example, have someone with them with a heavy rifle, just in case.

A safe walk in the woods. Just know and respect the woods.

by maecuff

misunderstood me.

My apologies. What I meant is that it would be heartless to NOT be affected by these images. You obviously ARE which says to me that you have a lot of heart. Are we clear now? :)

by jdclyde

She said it shows you have "A" heart for feeling that way, not that you have the heart to enjoy the viewing of such films.

It was meant in a good way. Trust me.

by onbliss

misunderstood, then it is me who should ask for apologies, not you :-)

So here it goes: Sorry for misunderstanding you.

by maecuff

chip and dale thing here, couldn't we? No..no it was ME, I'm sorry..

to avoid that, I'll just say that I accept your apology and that you should not be so thick-headed in the future. :)

by onbliss

Well I am not a hunter nor a Croc expert, so I will listen to what you folks say.

But I know one thing, it is always wise to practice caution with an hungry animal around, especially with a croc :-)

When I was a young boy, we had just got a new pet - German Sheperd, and I remember it kind of growling and scratching me when my dad was feeding him. It must have considered me as a competition when I went near his food. Both the dog and me were young.

edited: sentence structure

by maecuff

more worried about the OTHER hunters in the woods who don't understand the two rules.. Or the ones who do, but who have had waaay too many beers to be walking around with a loaded gun.

by jdclyde

Only a fool goes through life with no fear. It is someone that is brave that doesn't let that fear stop them from accomplishing their goal.

Fear is a sign of intellegence as well. Part of the survival mechanism.

by maecuff

And that is correct. Being fearful of everything would be a bad thing. But fear is important. Without fear, we'd never survive. It's GOOD to be afraid of some things.

by techexec2

I also said he took foolish needless risks. The point about living "without fear" is that he was not living "by fear" that so many people do.

Obviously, my post was critical of his living foolishly.

You're barking up the wrong tree. Both of you.

by jdclyde

Assume each and everyone that is in the woods is a complete moron and avoid them like the they have wolfpeople02 personality. At all costs.

Far fewer people get hurt from "friendly fire" than people that "didn't know the gun was loaded".

Two guys are out hunting, and one accidentily gets shot. The second guy bundles him up, and gets him to the hospital.

The doctor comes out of he operating room, so the man runs up and says "Well Doc, is he going to make it?"

The Doctor looks at him and replys, "I could have saved him if you hadn't gutted him".

Sorry, old joke. Bad joke. old bad joke.

by techexec2

You misunderstood what I said. The people I'm talking in the paragraph below ARE the apologists.

"People (the apologists) who advocate negotiation (with Al Qaeda), reasoning (with Al Qaeda), or withdrawal from the middle east (as a solution to "the problem") should watch them (the videos). They will never think that way again."

The murderers in the videos brutally murdered innocent civilians, not combatants (combatants should not get that kind of death either). What the killers did, and the way they did it, tells you very clearly the kind of crazy inhuman people we are dealing with over there.

We did not bring their wrath upon us. They already hated our guts, or people like us, and it goes back for centuries.

by onbliss

....ofcourse yes. But you could say Irwin had his "own" personality. Some liked it, some did not like it.

by jdclyde

and we are talking about the same people, for the same reason.

I just don't think watching the video will change the way they "feel". I would say "think" but it is clear that they DON'T "think".

I don't think watching these videos would make any difference to the same people we are both talking about.

by techexec2

"...I don't think watching these videos would make any difference to the same people we are both talking about..."

Well, you might be right, and I might be wrong, about THAT. :-)

And, if so, I say "off with their nuts"! We don't want another generation of THOSE people! :-)

by hal 9000

In this case it was a [b]Yank Woman[/b] who drove him on. Before his current wife came on the scene he was broke working his way just to pay for fuel on a clapped out old 4 Wheel Drive and old beat up tinny.

Then onto the scene came a Yank who dragged him into something else which he seemed to accept and do but here in this case when he died he wasn't filming for anyone but his daughter as something that she had asked for and he was doing it for her as a special gift.

Women are always at the root of all problem. :p

Col ]:)

by onbliss

...he was filming something called "Ocean's Deadliest" or something. And naturally assumed it was for a show.

by hal 9000

And he was getting something for his daughter. Over here she fronts some adds for the Family Business and makes out that it's [b]Her Place[/b] and the animals there are [b]Her Pets[/b] at the end she says something along the lines of maybe you'll get to see my Dad as well but that's more of any anticlimax than anything else. At the end when she says the bit about her father she holding onto an Elephants Trunk but you see her playing with the tiger cubs and some of the other animals.

Col

by maecuff

of bullsh*t I've seen in a while. :)

Are you suggesting that men can't think or make decisions for themselves??

by hal 9000

I might be slightly Cynical. :^0

But I can make decisions for myself but if they are not the ones that [b]SHMBO[/b] wants I learn to compromise and do as she wants after all [b]She's always right & I'm always wrong unless I agree with her.[/b] :p

My daughter is exactly the same as well so I just do as they tell me to do because I like a [b]Quite Life[/b] without constantly being Nagged! :(

Yep it's always the womans fault whenever anything nasty or good happens. :D

Col ]:)

by techexec2

You know, I almost put that at the end of my post! I just didn't want to add disrespect to my disagreement!

Woof! :-)

by onbliss

...is she doing after this incident? And what is his wife's reactions? Looks like even the Australian PM has expressed his sorrow. Must be something really big in Australia.

by tig2

It is sad to see him gone. But I valued the way he chose to live. Not my choice but his wasn't my life to live.

I have felt for some time now that failure to live your passion is the greatest regret you can have. When you are living as fully as you want to, you are LIVING. I am more the skid into the end with a martini in one hand saying, "Whee, what a ride!" type.

It is terribly sad that his wife, Terri, will not have him going forward. But given that her background is zoology as well, I don't see her returning to the States. I figure her for carrying on the work that Australia Zoo has done so well over the past years, both in breeding and supporting animals.

I saw an interview with him several years ago in which he made the following prophetic statement, "I will likely die as a result of something to do with an animal. I just hope it isn't a croc. I can see you all now- 'Always knew a croc would get him!'"

Truly sorry to see such a wonderful advocate for animals pass on.

Edited for clarity

by tig2

I know you know about the duckies!

Truthfully, there was a time in my life when I lived very carefully. Was willing to go a long distance for risk mitigation. There were many things that I was in fear of.

That changed for me when I thought that my life was going to be limited. I came to the realisation that I would rather live out loud than quietly in a corner.

And recently I proved to myself that there is truly nothing I cannot do if I am willing to put the hard work in. Something I thought I knew. Now I am certain.

Makes a major difference.

by onbliss

.... looks like he did not want crocs to get the bad name.

[i]
I saw an interview with him several years ago in which he made the following prophetic statement, "I will likely die as a result of something to do with an animal. I just hope it isn't a croc. I can see you all now- 'Always knew a croc would get him!'"[/i]

by tig2

He didn't want any animal to get a bad name. He constantly stressed that if something goes wrong, it was HIS error, not the animal.

There aren't many that brought what he did to understanding and valuing animals and the importance of them. He will be missed.

I believe that Animal Planet and Discovery (Animal Planet's parent corp) have established a fund in his name to benefit the AU Zoo and provide Bindi and Bob educational funding. What do you want to bet that Bindi goes into zoology? I think she will. Possibly Bob too.

by hal 9000

Remember the IRA who are Catholics did exactly the same thing on an almost daily basis to anyone who they thought where traitors to the cause.

Only instead of cutting off their heads they would use a Power Drill and drill out the Knee Joints as an example to others not to cross them.

Somehow eventually the Poms managed to Negotiate with the IRA. The PLO which was originally an outright Terrorist Organisation was accepted as a valid Political Party as well and many others so with time everything can be cured. It's only the rabid Religious people who believe that they are doing the right thing that scare me S H I T L E S S as to me they are the scary ones.

Col

by tink!

Ok, I'm going to attempt an analogy. I believe that Steve is getting way too much flack on the one incident with his baby. Granted [b]I[/b] would [b]never[/b] put any of my kids is such a situation, but [b]he[/b] is an entirely different life.

Ok, we are not in a life-threatening field. But try to pretend that a PC virus really is.

We often tell users NOT to do certain things because we know the potential of virusess, hijackings and identity theft (and some just plain dumb errors) is huge if they do. However, because we are experienced in such things, how many of us would not be willing to teach our young children how to maneuver around such areas that we tell the ordinary person to avoid?

Because we are so familiar with our field, we have a comfort zone that is far beyond that of the ordinary person. Within this comfort zone we tend to share this knowledge and training with our children. The same principle applies to anyone, in any field.

Pick any dangerous job you can think of. Think about the children of that person who does that job. Now sometimes people with dangerous jobs don't WANT their children to follow their footsteps and avoid teaching them, but I think the majority begin exposing their children right away.

Like football star dads. Professional or not, if a dad wants his son to be a football star too, don't they immediately start exposing the young one to football everywhere and in everything? (Again, not really life-threatening...but remember this is just a scenario comparison)

Such is what happens with Steve and his kids. Steve and Terry are immersed in their life. Their life IS Crocs and Wildlife. Therefore it is only natural for them to expose their children to this Life...within the limits of [b]their[/b] comfort zone. The big difference is that their comfort zone is nothing like our own. Because we don't live our lives immersed in dangerous wildlife. So let's all take a step outside of our own shoes and realize that their perspective is not delusional, but in a completely different path than our own. Therefore it is not for us to judge such actions.

Ok I think I'm done :)
Tink
[i](mother of 3 young children whom I'd never let near a croc, but have no problems letting them play Res Evil)[/i]

by techexec2

I agree with you Tink. That is just how Steve lived his life. Even for him, holding his baby while feeding a 12 foot croc was a foolish risk. What if he tripped, fell, and dropped it? There's no special knowledge or skill there. It's just foolish! But, it IS how he lived his life.

JD/Mae: Woof! :-)

by Member 25348569

"It IS how he lived his life" That's OK for him then but I don't think that his baby had much of a choice.

Bravery is confronting a twelve foot croc.

Stupidity is doing so whilst holding your baby under your arm.

End of message.

by maecuff

people living the way they want. I don't always understand it, but I won't say they SHOULDN'T. It is just my opinion that people who have children to raise who choose to live their lives in a dangerous way, are behaving selfishly.

meow.

by hal 9000

But as yet they haven't made an appearance and are sitting at home coming to terms with what has happened.

The family is staying out of the spotlight right at the moment but I think that no matter what they want something big will happen regarding Memorial Services after his funeral. His body has been brought back to his home now early this mourning actually and is now in a Funeral Home locally. I just hope that the Media leaves the family alone to get through their grief without intrusion.

At the moment they seem to be fairly decent and haven't bothered any of the workers at AU Zoo either they have just accepted the Press Announcement and it's business as usual there but there are heaps of flowers and the like being placed outside of the entrance and a lot of the children are undergoing counselling in the schools.

I never thought of Steve Irwin as a Flower person and I really think that he would much prefer donations to [b]Wildlife Warriors[/b] rather than floral tributes but maybe latter today Terri will make some sort of public statement. I just hope that she's not driven to it before she's comfortable doing it.

Currently his Manager has been the Front Person for the Press and I hope that it will stay that way.

Col
[i]Note Remember to replace the batteries in the keyboard. :(

by onbliss

...to my wife, that it is likely that his kids will get into zoology and wildlife. Atleast his daughter.

by hal 9000

That her Backyard AU Zoo is her private playground and her father was only a nuisance there to stop her doing what she wanted to do. He let her play with the Elephants and the like but not the bigger Crocks or Snakes which got up her nose no end.

I think that you have a pretty safe bet going there. :)

Col

by tig2

Considered to be lunatic?

Couple of points and I will shut up. He developed AU Zoo to be a combination of conservancy (breeding programmes) and education. He recognised that people fear things that they don't understand and sought to develop understanding.

His flamboyant character, in my opinion, helped that effort as people were drawn to him, drawn to watching him.

AU Zoo has been a leader in animal conservancy efforts as well as providing a home for animals in a bad way. They nursed sick animals, would answer calls from the public to remove nuisance animals and more. At one point, they were the reason that many animals were not distroyed when a zoo was closed down. They went in and got those animals out. They were able to do this becasue he was successful with a television show that was essentially about his life.

I do events like the 3 Day to draw attention to a disease in search of a cure. Over the course of fundraising for that effort, I was called fearless many times. There was nothing I wasn't willing to do. While I am not nearly as flamboyant as Steve Irwin, I certainly was as passionate about my cause as he was about his. What's the difference?

I feel strongly that animals have lost a great advocate. I firmly believe that Terri and the children will do everything they can to continue his work. I wish them all the luck.

by techexec2

It's amazing how people on TR like to parse words. One...false...word...and WHACK! :-)

We mainly agree here.

I think Steve took a lot of foolish risks with himself and his child (in this one incident we are picking on). But, he chose to live his life like that. Carrying his child was just "passing on the family business" to him. That's the point.

You and I think it is a foolish family business, but it was HIS family business. For me, putting his health and life on the line with huge crocs, deadly snakes, and deadly spiders was taking foolish unnecessary risks.

Tink is right. We should not be judging the man's entire extraordinary life by this one incident (feeding the croc while carrying his baby). His adventures, however risky, did bring a lot of information about animals to all of us and he loved what he did. That is how we should remember him.

by Member 25348569

One thing that we Brits have is Natural History with David Attenborough done by the BBC. Nothing that anyone else has done or will do will ever match what that guy has done and seen and filmed in the last fifty years (yes, fifty!).

Steve Irwin - well, when you've seen one crocodile, you've seen them all. I don't find him particularly extraordinary. In fact, he was pretty one dimensional, sensationalist and uninformative.

Sorry, but [b]this[/b] is what Natural History journalism and programming is about.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/programmes/who/david_attenborough.shtml

by onbliss

Not even Cousteau, eh? I used to watch Cousteau on his Calypso while I was a kid. Recently, I heard his son also has followed his father's footsteps.

Just because David did a lot does not lessen Irwin's contribution. It was just not crocodiles that he dealt; his work involved wildlife habitat restoration and preservation, kangaroos, kualas etc.

by marchred

Neilb

I was certainly no fan of Steve Irwin however I have read a number of articles on him since his death and the one thing that rings true is his commitment to conversation ... here's a snippet from one article:-

"Unlike others blessed with wealth, Irwin didn?t make donations to improve his image, but instead created his own charity Wildlife Warriors 'to safeguard Australia?s?wild animals and their habitats'. Since his death, Wildlife Warriors has been bombarded with donations, causing its website to fail for most of yesterday. The Age also noted that Irwin also 'bought huge tracts of land in Australia and abroad to protect and restore habitat for native species.' In making his purchases, Irwin 'met the Australian Wildlife Conservancy, which raises money to buy Australian land for conservation, to discuss strategies and identify which land was important.'"

So, like him or hate him (and I'm in the 'Crikey, he made me cringe' corner), the truth of the matter is that Steve Irwin did make a huge contribution to conservation.

by maecuff

one incident can be pretty telling sometimes, can't it?

For example, what if a married man loves his wife, buys her presents, cleans up after himself, takes care of the kids, earns a good living, does all the yard work..etc. But ONE time, he gets mad and beats the crap out of his wife. All those GOOD things don't make up for the ONE bad thing. Not at all.

And I'm not saying that what Steve Irwin did is comparable to spousal abuse, I'm just saying that ONE incident can be enough to cloud someone's judgement.

by jdclyde

The point is that it is stupid and reckless endangerment to have put his son into that situation.

If something goes wrong with the feeding, it would take everything he has to save his own life. What happens to baby with even one small slip?

There are many ways to make bring his son up around the animals without putting them in that situation. The fact that here was such an outcry and investigation by protective services shows that this was "not good". If he wasn't a 'big star" and was a common shmoe like the rest of us, he would have lost his son to the state. But he "promised not to do it agian".

by marchred

As an aussie, I used to cringe whenever I saw Steve Irwin on TV, as I knew that the image he portrayed was not me.

Since hearing of his death, I've read a lot of articles on the person that was (nay IS) Steve Irwin and I have to agree with ONBLISS - one cannot help but be impressed with his energy and enthusiasm. I saw a replay of a TV interview in which he stated he was the "... proudest aussie there is ...." I'm not sure there's such a thing as the 'proudest aussie' because all aussies take our pride in who we are seriously, but one thing is for sure, Steve Irwin did a lot to promote the Australia he truly loved and it is that which should be his legacy not a single act which many feel was stupid. [PS I'm over it now, but ...:)]

It is sad to see someone so relatively young die, but as his friend said, "... He died doing what he loves best and left this world in a happy and peaceful state of mind."

Crikey, as an aussie I'd much rather be branded as a khaki wearing, crocodile hunter than a cold-hearted detainer of children in refugee centres.

Vale, Steve Irwin - rest in peace, cobber

by zlitocook

To die and even worse for him, he may have lived if he did not remove the barb and if he had a medical crew on hand.
I would have thought he would have met his maker from a croc. Or shark. I did like watching and making fun of the crazy antics of the ausies. The other guy who keeps annoying and teasing the snakes and crocs. I thought he would get it but it was the guy that was trying to help.

by onbliss

...of heart rather than his pulling the barb out - well that's what I heard some experts claiming.

by jdclyde

did the IRA believe by blowing themselves up they would get their orgy in heaven?

Did their family recieve a million bucks to take care of them after the bread winner was gone?

Did the IRA strap bombs into children and send them into crouds?

The IRA did a lot of bad things,and I will admit to being ignorant of a lot of it, but they were amatures compared to the lunitics in radical islam. Did the IRA seek world domination as a superstate?

by ontheropes

It's been a month, at least, now so any misunderstanding is clearly Onbliss's fault.

(I have an explanation for this post ready anytime you need it Onbliss :| )

:p

edit: "at least" is two words isn't it?

by marchred

Doh!!! Steve Irwin was probably committed to strine as a conversationalist. Struth, can I dig a deeper hole here :)

by deadly ernest

he was no prefessional. He was more an adrenalin and media junky. According to those who knew him well and worked with him, before he became a media darling - he was contemptious of safety rules and never did his research properly.

He never took outrageous risks because he never did any risk calculations to say they were outrageous. Many of the people who worked with him on the shows only worked a short time as they felt there was insufficient safety thinking and insufficient checking of an area before going in.

His shows were good because he had excellent support and script writers. Also he's about as Australian as Crocodile Dundee is - and about as typically Australian as Charles Manson or George Bush are typical Americans.

I'm sorry to see him die like this, but I'm not sorry to see he's not making any more shows. Now if we can only can the reruns.

And for those who ask, many of his minders reconed, at the time, that the baby at the croc feeding was a publicity stunt as he was waning in the public eye. I wasn't there, but there is a hell of a difference between exposing the baby to crocs by having someone hold the kid at the fence and taking them into the enclosure - which by the way, was totally against the rules of that facility.

by maecuff

all like that. I may joke about it, but we do practice compromise in my house. I don't know the validity of birth order and behavior, but I've read that two first borns should never be a couple, because they are too head strong. My husband and I are both first borns and both very head strong. We may not always agree and we both REALLY want our own way, but we usually come to an agreement without MUCH bloodshed..

by dmambo

While I was on vaction this summer, My family was walking on some rocks on the shore of the Bay of Fundy when my daughter said there was a guy with a snake. Sure enough, on the sand below the rocks, there was a couple and the man was attempting to catch a snake by the tail as we watched from about 10 yards up on the rocks.

Eventually, the snake escaped from the guy and his girlfriend who had been using a long stick to keep the snake in the sand. As the couple was climbing back up the rocks I asked the guy what kind of snake it was. He said he had no idea.

I can only believe that this dork had seen one too many Croc Hunter or Jeff Corwin show and figured he knew what to do. Next time, I hope the snake has better luck.

by techexec2

You make a good point that all parents should consider carefully. I respect your view that it is "selfish", but just don't agree with that judgement.

There are many examples of parents where the "family business" is dangerous and is passed on from generation to generation:
- Military personnel (countless)
- Firefighter (countless)
- Fisherman (countless)
- Oil rig worker (countless)
- Race car driver (e.g. Andretti, Unser, etc)
- Daredevil circus acts (e.g. the "Great Wallendas")

I just don't agree that it is "selfish" for these people to have children. But, I do think they should think carefully about it. For example, they should make plans for their children's care should something happen to them.

I respect your view.

P.S. I'm sure you know that all of the "woof" stuff is frivolity about you and JD picking on my use of "living without fear" as opposed to "living based on fear".