Discussion Locked

Tech Juggler

0 helpful
232 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

This is page 3 of the discussion. Read the opening post

232 replies

by ebblyn2002

Yes, but don't forget to give credit where it is due.

After all these centuries, I am still here, pupil.

by jack-m

Interesting blog. I learned computers for the most part in a conventional manner. One year for Christmas my Dad gave me a Timex-Sinclair computer. If memory serves I could make a clock. It did start me on a 30+ year career in IT. College, post grad school, 1st job with Bell Labs but it was the non conventional tools I picked up along the way that would amaze some people.

By way of example....it's 2am and I'm at a Holiday Inn attempting to fix their switchboard. The book says I should be getting 1.5 volts output from an RS 232 source. My digital meter probe was too big to fit in the aperture. I called someone and they said "take a shunt cord and put the alligator clip on your meter probe. Take a paper clip and straighten it and put the paper clip on the other end of the shunt cord's alligator clip. Insert paper clip in tiny aperture and, viola. 1.5 volts.

Necessity is the mother of innovation. 

by dfirefire

The Commodore 64 was a big help (know nothing = get no result). Same goes for DOS. Experience is the major thing. Knowing that a real floppy drive (5 1/4inch) was light years faster than the tape recorder also helps to get the right perspective (How about the guy that wants to expand from 512Mb to 1Gb because his web pages don't show up fast enough?). Knowing that there is a book (nowadays: a website) about everything you want do achieve. Taking the time to actually Read The Fucking Manual (RTFM) before bothering anyone with a question for which the answer is on page one...

by hughclinton

Perseverance - I just don't give up - you know it can be fixed and if you just try all of your ideas and all the books and all the web pages eventually - you will fix it. Sometimes I even remember what I've done - and I call this... LEARNING.

I still can't do handwriting or art or soccer but I can fix the computer - because I TRY VERY VERY HARD.

by johns

OSSMOSIS This stuff just sorta filters into my brain when I'm around a computer.

I learned because I wanted my own computer for AutoCAD and the wife wouldn't let me buy one (4,800 bucks back then for a 286 set up for CAD). I bought a book on building computers, then bought one piece at a time until I had enough parts......

The neighbors started asking me to "look" at their computers..... then the women at work would ask me to fix their office computers..... now I keep over 100 systems running everyday.

Kinda like leaning to fix a car.....Wanted a car, but couldn't afford one.... bought a wreck, fixed stuff, added different stuff.... soon was running 9 sec quarters on the weekends at the strip..... Next thing I know, everybody wanted me to work on their cars! 

 

Computers are much cleaner to work on and there has never been a time where I had to lay on my back in the dirt to get at something.

by lifesablast

All comments ring very true in my career.  Been there and there.  I have also found that if I'm stuck on a particularly complex problem, I leave it and sleep on it.  My subconcious must be at work cause everything's clearer the next day and I have more options to try which usually lead to a speedy solution.  But the people I support don't know or even care how I did it - just that it works!  I remain amazed at the complexity and power of the mind to problem solve!

by crash84

Of course I started on a 286 in 87. Give a bored employee a computer on a midnite shift and look out. The funny thing is someone had to show me how to turn the damn thing on. Anyway it just snowballed from there. Now I have 3 states and 19 servers to watch over. But the thing that always works for me is, "I tell them that it's magic, just technical magic" or "that's why they pay me the big bucks", since they think we're all millionaires anyway, and they leave it there. Nice thing about my workplace is that most of my users think I walk on water when it comes to computers and I sure don't discourage it, if they only knew ha ha.

by rclark2

Most of the time I just smile. But the hard part is handling the outpouring of gratitude from frazzeled users. My normal response is "Every two weeks, they give me a slip of paper my bank will turn into money. Can you believe they pay me to do this?"

by pj8089

You guys bring back many memories.... I "usually" tell people why I know so much about computers is I have done it wrong more than anyone else !  Starting out on the Timex-Sinclairs, TRS-80's, Commodore 64's and the very first IBM desktop, I have read the DOS 1.0 and the Basic 1.0 books from cover to cover, used Xtree, fdisk, wrote batch files.  Even have done a diskcopy from floppy to a Huge 10 meg. harddrive !   Back then there was no one to ask, it was either read or just do.  Got used to fixing, what I tried to destroy.  The first formal training I ever had was in Austin Texas, at Texas Intrustments training center, to learn "fat fingering".  Ouch... lol those were the days.

by charliespencer

I tell them I just have a different set of skills. Sure, I can fix a computer, but I have no idea how to negotiate a lease contract, drive a forklift, forecast annual sales, or schedule a production line; all skills possessed by the people I support.  I learned many my skills the same way they learned theirs: school, OJT, trial and error, etc.

by ravnor

Good list!  ^_^

I imagine we've all had the experience of getting a call about a computer problem and when we get there and try to replicate it, the computer works just fine.  "But it REALLY WAS doing that.  What did you do?  Does the computer sense your presence and obey you??" the user exclaims.  I just mumble something about the "laying upon of hands" or that "I'm good with small animals and computers..."

by master3bs

Great comments from everyone.  They've taken me back.

My first computer was a Laser 128K, which was an Apple IIe clone.  I learned Apple Basic on it, which helped.  Unfortunately I largely taught myself so years later I had to relearn good programming techniques.

To show you what kind of a visionary I was at the time, I was baffled when hard drives came out.  I couldn't imagine how they could possibly be better than floppies.

by bfilmfan

You missed the one about the visit to the lab and the radioactive Tandy TSR-1 bit you granting you strange and unusual abilities like clinging to floppy drives and ability to sense when a bit was being flipped in a router.

Maybe you can get Toby to play you in the movie and have David Warner playing as your arch-nemesis, the clueless program manager.

by iprue

When asked how I fixed something or learned about computers I respond "It's MAGIC".

by gr.steers

I enjoyed your answers a lot!  I have had same questions asked of me over 25 years of working with computers, and I have finally settled on the reply "Its Magic!"  No other explanations seemed to matter.  So when I retired from my regular job, I set up a small home business called "Gerry's Computer Magic", and now they don't have to ask. They know its Magic!

 

by master3bs

It started when somebody sent me a link to a video on youtube.com. It was fairly interesting. I surfed the site for a bit, then went back to my regularly scheduled day.

Then I came into possesion of a webcam. Then I started using it to record videos. Then I found a better video editing program than Windows Movie Maker. Now I'm hosting two videos on youtube.com. More will likely follow.

The possible interest will be from those that enjoy video editing, and perhaps video watching. I am very tempted to embed the videos here, but that's just poor internet etiquette.

So for those that might care:
The second was made as a promo for a crisis pregnancy center.

by Jay Garmon

First, glad you like video, because we're looking to add more to the
site. Second, you couldn't embed video in a TR blog if you wanted to,
because we filter out the <object> tag that allows you to do so
(long story, involving source code and security standards).

I'd be curious to know when and where people find video an appropriate
content type, and how it should be presented (embedded or otherwise).

by master3bs

Not allowing the object code is actually an excellent idea.  I was curious if it would work or not.

As far as where and how to do videos here, I think an additional tabbed section (ie news, blogs, people, etc) would be best.

I would much prefer the ability to download the video over embedding.  Embedding is a nice secondary feature, if an option could be given.  But it is annoying to have to redownload videos on some of the hosting sites every time I want to watch or show it to somebody.

by shiny_topadm

A related question:

With the growth in popularity of these things, do I need to allow them to be accessed over our [small business's] network?  I currently have the biggest "known" names like youtube, googlevideos, etc. blocked at the firewall.  The video portions of the various big-name news sites are allowed (they tend to have very small clips).  Is this content likely to increase our need for more bandwidth?  I've already been asked about the filesize limit of our email attachments because of video files that people want to send and receive!

by charliespencer

Geek, J.Ja and I went 15 rounds with Jason Hiner on the subject of podcasts last week.  Our objection was to an article that was available in one format only, that being audio.  I'm inclined to raise the same concerns about video at TR.  Unless the video demonstrates a subject that can only be conveyed in that medium, it should be accompanied by a corresponding text or other non-multimedia article (screen captures, transcribed interviews, step-by-step instructions, bullet-point highlights, etc.).  Not all of us have the bandwidth to handle video, the software to display it, or the speakers or sound capablity to hear it.  I'm not saying don't do video, just asking that it be accompanied by text whenever possible.

If it is used, reserve it for something that actually shows or demonstrates a technique or technology.  Don't waste it on interviews, speeches, point-and-click screen actions, etc.  All of that can be conveyed in other forms.  On the other hand, if you've got video of Jaqui using Powerpoint, now we're talking.

by master3bs

Disclaimer: The actual length of time between events may differ slightly from reality. Truth to tell, the actual time lengths could make the story more humorous, but I'm doing this from memory. Give me a break, okay?

Day 1: Upper
Management notes that my new Behavior Management System Database runs efficiently
and saves several hours every week on data entry time.

Day 5: Upper
Management notes that the old training database continues to have
problems. The formulas don?t calculate
accurately and its too easy to make input errors. Perhaps, they ponder aloud, Scott could
overhaul it or completely remake it.

Day 6: I am asked to make updates to the Behavior
Management System. It works so well,
they want to put unrelated information into the database. I sigh and get to work.

Day 10: The requirements for the Behavior Management System change. Nobody informs me.

Day 21: I complete
the changes to the system.

Day 22: I am asked
why I did not implement the new requirements.
I tell upper management why and discover they are not big fans of
sarcasm.

Day 31: The
training staff asks if I can create a new report on their old Training
Database. I begin to do so, shuddering
at the spaghetti logic code in the system.
I say a prayer, thankful that I?ve not been asked to work on that system.

Day 33: I
complete the new report.

Day 40: I finish
the Behavior Management System. Again.

Day 50: Upper Management
asks my supervisor when I?ll be finished on the Training Database. Later in the day, I am assigned the task.

Day 51: I begin
trying to coordinate a meeting time with everyone involved in Training to
properly gather requirements.

Day 63: Having given up on ever meeting with all six
employees, I take what I can get and have the meeting anyway. What I can get turns out to be three. Including myself.

Day 65: Having
reviewed the code and the requirements I conclude that I need to completely redesign
the system, while at the same time being able to import the old legacy data.

Day 70: I?m asked
why I haven?t finished the system yet. I
tell them I haven?t had time. Them: How
much time do you need?

Me: About a month.

Them: That?s unacceptable.
This was assigned three months ago.
We?ll task you out. Work on
nothing besides this and emergencies. Have
it ready in a week. This is our number
one priority.

Me: I can?t. Two
weeks; maybe.

Day 77: Much to
my surprise, I finish early.

Day 78: They don?t
look at the system. They?re too busy. There are too many higher priorities.

Day 90: I train
the person who will be entering the data

Day 95: I train
him again.

Day 100: He begins
entering data into the new Training Database

Day 101: Upper
management begins pondering aloud whether more unrelated data should be entered into
the Behavior Management System.

by master3bs

I'm a geek.  I also love basketball.  I admit both
freely.

So when the juvenile detention facility I work at hosted a staff vs staff
basketball game with the inmates watching, I was eager to play.  The
results were pretty much what you'd expect.

At one point the staff were going to play the inmates, but the medical
department said the temperature and heat index were too high, so they could
only watch as the computer geek embarrassed himself.

That?s not entirely true. 
I had three assists, three blocks, four rebounds and one busted
shoe.  I forgot that we were playing
today, but avid fan that I am, I opted to play in my dress shoes, dress pants
and a t-shirt.  I refused to lay my
security keys down, so they hung off my belt loop during the entire game.  This, of course, did nothing to enhance my
image. I only missed one shot though. Guess how many I tried?

I can also achieve a sunburn in moonlight.  By the end of the day I?ll probably look like
a lobster.  At least my deodorant wore
out so I can smell bad.

The worst part of it? 
All those people I?ve been apologizing to because I?ve been too busy to
get to their minor tech issues? 
Yep.  They were there.  So I have some explaining to do later.

So what does this have to do with IT?  Well, sometime this weekend, I?ll probably
break out the XBOX and play a game of basketball on it.  This time, I?ll win.

by master3bs

Here are my thoughts on Superman Returns. Becuase it's important to me, that's why. There will be some spoilers, but I'll warn you ahead of time so you can read up until that point.

I had very high hopes for this film, and as always when that is the case, it took some time afterwards to digest how I truly felt. First though, let's remember some of the ideas that were thrown around for a "Superman movie" that thankfully didn't get made:

- Nicholas Cage as Superman
- Giant spiders
- Fighting polar bears at the Fortress of Solitude
- Tim Burton directing which would have included
- A completely different costume
- A Superman that could not fly
- Intersteller war with Krypton
- Lex Luthor as a CIA Agent

There's more, but you get the point. The film itself? Loved it. There are things I can nitpick about and I probably will. But I loved it, for four reasons.

1) It gave tributes to the Superman movies and comics
2) It contained some of the best superhero action scenes ever (I'm specifically thinking about the plane scenes)
3) The cast was great
4) I believed a man could fly again.

1) The opening sequence blew me away. Remember I saw it on an IMAX screen too. It looked, sounded and felt just like Superman I & II. Only better. It brought out all those feelings I used to have watching I & II (and also III & IV, back when I didn't know any better)

The lines & parallel scenes from the first films were there. The classic Action comics cover was there. The love for Superman was there. Making this a loose continuation of the first two films was a stroke of genius.

2) I?ll add this to the action bit. The film did an excellent job of creating tension, even when I knew things would work out. That?s hard to pull off.

3) Brandon Routh looked a bit young as Superman at times. But he also looked like Superman. It took one scene with him in the suit for me to buy into it. He reminded me of Reeves, but the part was his own.


Kevin Spacey was incredible as Lex Luthor. I expected a decent job by him based on what I had read, but really I was blown away. he was funny but dark. You could see the Hackman character going this direction.

Kate Bosworth sounded nothing like Margaret Kidder. I really appreciated that.

4) Superman looked and felt? like Superman.

Let?s address some issues now. The cape had no S on the back. Until a friend pointed that out, I didn?t even notice it. I?m ashamed, but its true. Obviously though, it didn't detract. If that's the worse the film has to offer, we're in good shape.

But there is a plot point that people are discussing. I want to address it, so if you haven't seen the film and don't want to know (which I didn't) what happens, stop reading now and come back after you've seen the movie.

S
P
O
I
L
E
R

S
P
A
C
E

Lois had a son. *sigh* The son belonged to Superman. *sigh* This makes for some controversy, and rightly so. However, it didn?t detract from the film for me and here?s why. This is based on the first two Superman movies; and for my money this was implied in the second film. Yeah, you didn?t have to go that direction, and if I had made the film (heh) I wouldn?t have. Still, while not overt, it was implied in that film that the relationship was? intimate. Watch it again and tell me if I?m wrong (I?ll be watching it again myself.)

It certainly does open up interesting story ideas for the sequels. Time will tell if they are good story ideas.

There is also the issue of why Superman left. It?s been rightly pointed out that Superman told the President at the end of II that "I'll never go away again." If you?re going to buy into my II rationalization for the son, this has to be addressed. And here?s what I came up with?

Sorry. I?ve got nothing.

Finally, a friend asked this in an email: <respectful tips of the hat turn into blatant copying? Several lines were direct swipes from the original Donner movies. Several scenes seemed to be copies, including the opening credits.>>

That?s a good question. I have a poor answer: ?I?ll know it when I see it.? And it wasn?t the case here. I was thrilled to see those in there. They added to the film.

by tubadenis

Good review

Although I've been planning on going to see the movie but didn't get spare time to do so, you've just given me more incentive to take my butt off the computer chair and go watch it with my 3 sons.  Somewhere in there, I knew that Kevin Spacey would make a great Lex.

Thanks again for the review, because us regular people don't tend to criticize movies the same way the critics do and we get a more unbiased reviews from viewers.

Tubadenis

by yobtaf

I pretty much agree with this review. It's worth going to see even if you don't like super hero films.

I?just have a couple of personal comments:

Unless something better comes out this year, Superman Returns will win the Academy award for visual effects. Not only was there new and innovative technology but this is the first film to use the new Panavision Genesis camera.

The main title design was so?influenced by the original film that it's virtually a copy of it. I'm not saying that this is bad. On the contrary, I think that it was a tribute to Richard Greenberg the designer of the original titles not to mention that the designer of the new titles started in the industry working for Richard. However, as far as I could see, there is no mention of Mr?Greenberg in the credits. I think Kyle Cooper, the current designer, should have insisted on?acknowledging his mentor.

by jaybofma

I am glad that you enjoyed the movie.  I, however, am more of a purest, I guess.  And perhaps I am biased, as I grew up reading some of the later comics and watching the TV series.  But I openly admit this bias and cherish it.

I have no intention to see this movie, as the makers seem to think that the nationality, spirit and sentiment of the absolute majority of their moviegoers and targeted audience is too controversial to include in the historical story line.  One has to read the comics, see the old TV series, and reflect on the period in which the cartoon and series were developed, to see how important and strong  "...the American Way" was to the true Superman.  It is sad that "...the American Way" is no longer politically correct in Hollywood.  But if that is so, then I can surely refrain from spending my $20 - 30 (for two with refreshments) to see this not-so-super man.  And I won't even bother to shell out the $4.00 when it is out in video.

To me, the theater and movies are more about art, and less about entertainment.  After all, the best art, regardless of medium, brings entertainment as well as raising important themes and ideals while stirring discussion and debate.  If the movie makers are so strongly against the American Way, then they should stop being hypocrites, and make more apropos movies than one that was drawn from such roots.  They should stand up for their beliefs and make a political statement, rather than cut out a few lines that they think will cost them a few million in gross.  And let's be honest, that is a mere pittance compared to the hundreds of millions they would gross even if banned in theaters and rentals of France for the inflammatory "...American Way" theme!

by seo

I saw the movie and really enjoyed it! As for my wife, who does not recalled Reeves playing this role, she thinks Routh was much better looking.

Even though all of the scenes were gigantic in itself, there was one thing missing that could've helped make this movie memorable -- the music could've been better placed during moments of tension and triumph.

If you will, recall the scene where Superman was lifting that continent. This scene should've show what he did to lift this huge piece of land. All I saw was this huge piece of land rising from the ocean and he was struggling to take it out of Earth. For some reason, I don't recalled hearing any music before or after his involuntary descend to Earth.

Overall, if you have kids over 13 years of age, take them to go see it. Good father and son movie!

 

 

 

by master3bs

Mr. James: Don't mess with the man with the wayback machine Dave, I can make it so that you were never born.

From Mr. Peabody's Improbable History segment on The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle to Mr. James on NewsRadio and on to the internet itself, the Wayback Machine has cemented itself as an important part of our culture. Or, failing that, it is now a way we can look back at the history of internet culture.

Found here at archive.org the Wayback Machine has in its archives websites dating back to 1996. I enjoyed finding websites I had a part in creating that have since been modified or no longer exist. I even managed to find some nice javascript code that I had written and didn't want to have to recode.

Remember when Webcrawler was one of the internet's top search engines? For that matter, take a look at Yahoo today and Yahoo back then. You've come a long way baby! The site also offers interesting collections of memorable dates and the applicable websites.

The site has a lot of interesting areas, but the Wayback Machine is the most compelling. Play around with it and if you find any archived sites of interest, feel free to post them as comments to this blog entry.

For the sake of this blog I tried to find the earliest TechRepublic website available. There is an entry for April 29, 1999 but it put me into an infinite loop. The October 13, 1999 entry informs me the site was down for maintenance. The November 17, 1999 entry told me I couldn't view it because I needed version 4.0 or above of IE or Netscape. Shame on Techrepublic for being so biased against FireFox back in 1999. (heh) But wait, it doesn't work in IE 6.0 either!

Finally, a March 1, 2000 entry let me in. The lead article was "Twelve simple steps to troubleshooting TCP/IP problems" by Jim Wells.

All the archives for TR can be found here: http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.techrepublic.com

This discussion is closed to new replies.