General discussion

Locked

Too much RAM?

By patracy_uk ·
Reading comments in a discussion I came across these comments from Chas;
That said, I suspect that the root cause of your bad CDs is too much RAM.

There is a known W98 bug if 512MB or more RAM is installed. I limit ALL of my W9X boxes to 384MB.

The 'bug' is VERY configuration dependant. Anything from new hardware to an updated driver can trigger the bug.

Try removing some RAM and burning a new CD to see if that corrects the bad burn issue.

and it could explain some problems I'm having.
The question is this, why [briefly] does this happen and will changing the OS allow me to boost the RAM above 512?
Also, am I being thick, how does he limit W9x boxes?
tia Pete

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

5 total posts (Page 1 of 1)  
| Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -

by TheChas In reply to Too much RAM?

Pete,

Microsoft has acknowledged that there is a problem with more than 512MB of RAM and Windows 98 / Me.

The problem is in the core Windows code.

See these Microsoft Knowledge Base Articles for more information:

http://tinyurl.com/slr2

http://tinyurl.com/3elp

The statement of the bug being configuration dependant springs from the fact that some systems function fine with 1GB of RAM.
There are many variables that effect whether a system will suffer from the bug.
The main issue, is how the BIOS, memory controller and devices deal with each other as a system.
I have personally seen systems slow to a crawl after increasing RAM from 256MB to 512MB. Removing the extra RAM fixes the problem.

There are 2 ways to limit a system to 384MB of RAM:

Install no more than 384MB.

Set a maxmem statement in the system files so that Windows ignores RAM beyond that amount.
Theoretically, you could install 512MB and set a maxmem to 500MB to maximize memory yet avoid the bug.

There are also benchmark test results that show "optimum" performance with 196MB of RAM on a W98 system. In the test, the same system with more than 196MB of RAM actually had lower performance scores.

Windows 2000 and XP do not suffer from the large RAM bug.
Of course, since Microsoft could not test the code with larger amounts of RAM than the best systems available at the time of development, there may be a large memory bug in the W2K / XP code, we just don't have the systems that would show it yet.

Chas

Collapse -

by patracy_uk In reply to

Poster rated this answer.

Collapse -

by davidr In reply to Too much RAM?

I believe Chas covered everything that needs to be said, but I thought I'd add that I am running a spare pc here at work that has a 800MHz P3 and 1Gig of Rambus RAM. This pc is working flawlessly for me. We have some pc's with 2.8 Ghz P4's and 2 Gig of 2700 DDR RAM that also run fine.

Dave

Collapse -

by patracy_uk In reply to

Poster rated this answer.

Collapse -

by patracy_uk In reply to Too much RAM?

This question was closed by the author

Back to Desktop Forum
5 total posts (Page 1 of 1)  

Related Discussions

Related Forums