I don’t think it’s a bad thing at all to have the training with no experience. It’s certainly better than no training and no experience. At least there’s a basis from which to build. After all, that happens all the time when people get out of college with one or more impressive degrees. In addition, the person posting the question has Army experience in his past, and the military always trains and “certifies”, so to speak, before putting that person into the practical application of that training. (They’re trained for a particular MOS before they apply that training.)
I’m a proponent of NOT leaving pertinent details off a resume. We frown on the practice of misrepresenting one’s qualifications and/or experience by exaggerating on a resume, so leaving off applicable information would be just as misleading. Personally, I think that by getting the certifications as described indicates that the person not only shows initiative, but that he also has a well-rounded, albeit general, knowledge of the subject, and has a unique ability to learn new things quickly and thoroughly. We all know that education only starts at graduation, and that learning – especially in this industry – is a life-long process. Why should this circumstance be any different?
Here’s an example of how the issue could be addressed:
Career Objective:
I am seeking a position where I can apply the principles I learned while earning mycertifications, and I would like to do so in a way that’s immediately helpful to (the company name) by bringing a positive work ethic, a willingness to follow directions, and a knack for solving problems. Understanding that training and certifications are not as effective without the practical experience to compliment such training, I would prefer a subordinate position under someone with the practical experience necessa