Maxwell, please save your comments for someone who deserves them more than BFilmFan and those others of us who have contributed to the feeding frenzy over entawanabi's posts. The man - entawanabi - is a complete idiot.
I agree with you that if someone asks a question, however stupid or however bad the spelling or grammar, we don't really have the right to stick it to the questioner without better reasons. Entawanabi, however, sets himself up for anything we care to dish out because of his [b]responses[/b] to questions and articles. I include for your perusal the top four from his list of posts. I haven't read the rest - yet.
A response to a TR article on a delayed MS patch:
Of course we all know in perfect world of programming there were no mistakes made (and if there were they were caught before they left the floor_Let's assume this is so for this argument: Nowwe then look at "US" who are of course less perfect, "IT WEREN"T US"; so who did do it? The premise I pose and find in my field of expertise; Boy, do I want to snicker at me when I see what ya'll can do; Is your system founded?; How many decades ago was that?; Just where is it operating and from what basis - I'm seeing some stuff that is not cool -?; Boot, Boot, Boot, and REBOOT, INSTALL, RE-INSTALL, Whoops! What happenned to the boot disc HOW OLD IS IT?
Maam, if you or someone is haveing trouble with there mouse reread in the Mouse program instead of replaceing the complete set-up, usually this is sufficient. It also highlights that occasionally that these things FADE, I think is the correct term, with use.
--------------
In this post, he answers a perfectly reasonable question about wireless security with complete tosh:
The first part is to design your, or consider the structure of your user name and password Operation, that will provide most of your problems solutions, the second part is provided with a registerred 'IP', an Identification Protocol. I'm not sure where to get one but that is\was the common practise.24
--------------
Another response to a question on network access problems - in full!
It is one of the rudimentary things: for a lot of reasons 'THEY' could no longer be networked together correctly. It is a place to start.
--------------
A response to a user with Access Denied problems on his home LAN:
IP(Identification protocall) they have to be known to both machines, this normally is not the problem but bringing it up addressing it, it is out of the way. Next, this can be problematic of elderly machines and rarely elderly wiringnext is the operations scaled to the machine(s)- I've no way of doing much with this subject and maybe someone else will be able to remember the vocabulary requiring a minimum amount of mega-bytes for something to work at all, IS THERE A WAY TO TELL HOW MANY RESIDENT OPERATIONS AND FUNCTIONS ARE HOLDING HOSTAGE 'megs", Ikow I'm the only one that messes up that darn CAP LOCK button! Finally IF this is 'a' used set or one is used is it possible that the security operations are finnally catching up?
--------------
There is more and it does make for fun reading.
These are responses to questions. I rest my case.
Neil
p.s. Sorry, I just had to add this answer re: a lost partition
Your 'drive`spins at a certain rate, out near the edge the gravities are high, the bucket weighs three pounds but when you swing it in a circle ay arms length it weighs much more, after a few years the medium spins off; agood example of extreme medium loss is a very small feild on your screen that is not expandable and you never seem to be able to save anything well, also you can toss your antenna as wellas its coating; so then do you have any storage medium left that is coherent? And how much. As far as recovery is concerned: in DOS 2.2 is Drive.RECif your drive is properly set-up and founded this will recoer what is possible including from fibers that used to hold the storage medium.