- Best for complex enterprise projects: IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
- Best for user-friendly experience and integration capabilities: Helix RM
- Best for seamless Azure DevOps integration: Modern Requirements
- Best for integrated test management: SpiraTest
- Best for real-time collaboration: Jama Connect
- Best for versatility and all-in-one functionality: ClickUp
- Best for agile development and scalability: Jira
- Best for remote teams and workflow automation: Wrike
Requirements management tools serve as the backbone for capturing, tracking and managing project requirements. These tools not only help in aligning the project deliverables with business objectives but also play a crucial role in stakeholder communication, compliance adherence and risk mitigation. From basic task tracking to complex compliance management, requirement management tools offer a plethora of features to satisfy the needs of project teams.
Here are ten of the top requirements management tools to help you — whether you’re a project manager, a business analyst or a stakeholder looking to invest in a robust requirements management solution — make an informed decision.
Featured Partners
Top requirements management tools comparison
Although these tools are meant to serve the same purpose, they couldn’t be more different in the way they deliver their capabilities. Here’s how they compare to each other.
| Requirement traceability | Version control | Workflow automation | Impact analysis | Customizable dashboards | Compliance management | Starting price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM DOORS | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Contact for quote |
| Helix RM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Contact for quote |
| Modern Requirements | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Contact for quote |
| SpiraTest | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | $1306/year |
| Jama Connect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Contact for quote |
| ClickUp | Limited | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | $7/user/month |
| Jira | Limited | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | $8.15/user/month |
| Wrike | Limited | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | $9.80/user/month |
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next: Best for complex enterprise projects
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next is a leading tool in the requirements management space, particularly known for its robustness and scalability. DOORS Next enables teams to better manage their project cost and scope. It does this through features like traceability, impact analysis and compliance management, which make it a great choice for handling complex enterprise-level projects.
Pricing
Pricing is available upon request. However, it offers a live demo.
Features
Figure A
- Comprehensive requirement (Figure A) traceability for project alignment.
- Advanced querying capabilities for complex data retrieval.
- Robust compliance management for regulatory adherence.
- Version control for tracking changes and history.
- Impact analysis to assess requirement changes.
Pros
- Highly robust for enterprise use.
- Excellent for managing complexity.
- Industry standard for reliability.
- Strong focus on compliance management.
Cons
- Costly for smaller teams.
- Learning curve is steep.
Why we chose IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM DOORS Next stands out for its comprehensive feature set tailored for complex, large-scale projects. Plus, its industry reputation makes it a go-to choice for enterprises needing advanced requirements management capabilities.
Helix RM: Best for user-friendly experience and integration capabilities
Helix RM offers a blend of user-friendliness and powerful integration capabilities, making it a top choice for teams that prioritize ease of use without having to sacrifice functionality. It allows its users to centralize, reuse and decompose requirements through features like requirement versioning, traceability matrix and seamless third-party integrations.
Pricing
Request a quote on Hilux RM, as official pricing information is not publicly listed.
Features
Figure B
- User-friendly interface for quick adoption.
- Requirement versioning for historical tracking.
- Traceability (Figure B) matrix for requirement relationships.
- Seamless third-party integrations for extended functionality.
- Compliance management for regulatory adherence.
Pros
- Easy to use and adopt.
- Excellent customer support.
- Strong integration capabilities.
- Can be used alongside Jira.
Cons
- Limited feature list.
- Lack of clarity between modules.
Why we chose Helix RM
Besides being user-friendly, it’s a great requirements management tool to use with Jira. This means that it gives you more options on how to use Jira, not only for requirements management but also for task management and bug tracking. You can link requirements from Helix RM to Jira issues and vice versa.
Modern Requirements: Best for seamless Azure DevOps integration
Modern Requirements specializes in offering a suite of requirements management tools that integrate seamlessly with Azure DevOps. For teams already invested in the Azure ecosystem, this tool is an ideal choice, providing features like requirement elicitation, traceability and version control.
Pricing
Modern Requirements offers 4 pricing modules; Agile, Compliance, Enterprise and Enterprise Plus. However, you’d have to contact them for pricing information.
Features
Figure C
- Seamless integration with Azure DevOps for streamlined workflows.
- Traceability (Figure C) features for tracking requirement changes.
- Version control and variant management for tracking software package and variant history.
- Compliance management to reduce compliance reporting efforts.
- Visualization tools for high-fidelity aids, designs and reports.
Pros
- Tailored for Azure DevOps.
- Modular pricing structure.
- Strong focus on traceability.
- Excellent for agile teams.
Cons
- Limited outside Azure DevOps.
- May require training.
Why we chose Modern Requirements
Modern Requirements stands out for its seamless integration with Azure DevOps. Its modular pricing and a strong focus on traceability show that it’s a versatile tool for various project sizes.
SpiraTest: Best for integrated test management
SpiraTest stands out for its integrated approach to test management within the requirements management framework. It also offers other features, like administration and data migration, while offering full support for desktop and mobile devices. For teams that need to closely align their testing and requirements processes — all while keeping costs in check — SpiraTest is worth considering.
Pricing
SpiraTest’s pricing options bill users through either Cloud or Download options. The Cloud plan has options on whether to be billed annually or monthly, with annual billing starting at $1,306 per year for three concurrent users.
Features
Figure D
- Requirements management (Figure D), release management and document collaboration.
- Reporting and organization features for project management, reporting and analytics.
- Bug tracking, customization and build management capabilities.
- Automated, manual and exploratory test management.
Pros
- Robust version control features.
- Strong focus on test management.
- Easy to set up and use.
- Great customer support.
Cons
- Steeper learning curve for beginners.
- UI can be unintuitive.
Why we chose SpiraTest
Unlike a number of the tools on this list, SpiraTest’s pricing information is publicly available, which enables prospective users to figure out costs off the bat. Additionally, SpriaTest is not just a requirements management tool but also a complete quality assurance solution.
Jama Connect: Best for real-time collaboration
excels in fostering real-time collaboration among team members and offers robust impact analysis features. It delivers end-to-end compliance, process improvement and risk mitigation, among other features. Jama Connect can serve teams that need to work closely together and understand the implications of requirement changes in real time.
Pricing
Contact Jama for a quote, as pricing isn’t publicly offered.
Features
Figure E
- Live traceability (Figure E) to ensure product quality and better change management.
- Real-time collaboration for cross-functional communication.
- Test and quality management capabilities.
- Review center for centralized feedback.
- Risk and hazard analysis to ensure compliance through integrated risk management.
Pros
- Strong focus on team collaboration.
- Multiple user license types.
- Comprehensive reporting features.
- Higher quality requirements authoring.
Cons
- Fewer out-of-the-box integrations.
- Its interface can come off as complex.
Why we chose Jama Connect
Jama Connect is particularly strong in the areas of real-time collaboration and impact analysis, making it a great tool for constant communication among all kinds of stakeholders.
ClickUp: Best for versatility and all-in-one functionality
ClickUp is known for its versatility and all-in-one functionality. It delivers a multi-faceted tool for more than just requirements management, with features like task management, time tracking and even goal setting in addition to its requirements management capabilities.
Pricing
Aside from a free plan, ClickUp’s paid plans start at $7 per user per month when billed annually and $10 per user per month billed monthly.
Features
Figure F
- Versatile platform for multiple project needs.
- Task management (Figure F) for organized workflows.
- Time tracking for productivity insights.
- Goal setting for team alignment.
- Task priorities for a clear order of operations.
Pros
- Highly versatile platform.
- Affordable pricing options.
- User-friendly interface.
- Strong community support.
Cons
- Its variety of features can be overwhelming.
- It’s a rather general project management tool.
Why we chose ClickUp
ClickUp stands out for its versatility and all-in-one functionality. It’s great for project management features in addition to requirements management. Its affordability and strong community support add to its appeal.
For more information, read the full ClickUp review.
Jira: Best for agile development and scalability
Jira is a well-known tool in the agile development space, offering robust requirements management features that scale with your team. If your organization follows agile methodologies and you need a tool that can adapt to growing needs, then you should consider Jira.
Pricing
Jira’s paid plans start at $8.15 per user per month billed monthly and cost $850 per year for 1-10 users.
Features
Figure G
- Agile (Figure G) development support for iterative processes.
- Scalable architecture for growing teams.
- Customizable workflows for tailored processes.
- Real-time collaboration for team communication.
- Sub-tasks feature for a fast way to add and manage requirements.
Pros
- Strong focus on kanban and scrum methods.
- Highly scalable platform.
- Extensive third-party integrations.
- Customizable to specific needs.
Cons
- Can be complex to set up.
- It can easily get really expensive.
Why we chose Jira
Jira is particularly strong in supporting agile development methodologies. Its extensive third-party integrations and customization options strengthen Jira’s position and add to its versatility.
For more information, read the full Jira review.
Wrike: Best for remote teams and workflow automation
Wrike excels in providing features that cater to remote teams and offers robust workflow automation capabilities. With a range of capabilities, including automation, dashboards, streamlined proofing, cross-tagging and project resource planning, Wrike is a top choice for organizations that have distributed teams and seek to automate various aspects of their requirements management process.
Pricing
Besides a free plan, Wrike’s paid plans start at $9.80 per user per month.
Features
Figure H
- Remote team support for distributed workforces.
- Workflow automation for streamlined processes.
- A requirements management template (Figure H).
- Customizable dashboards for personalized tracking.
- Strong reporting and performance analytics features.
Pros
- Excellent for remote teams.
- Strong workflow automation.
- User-friendly interface.
- Extensive customization options.
Cons
- Limited advanced RM features.
- Users may find its UI to be complex.
Why we chose Wrike
Wrike stands out for its focus on catering to remote teams and its robust workflow automation features. It offers a template that allows users to quickly jump into tracking the requirements, reviews, approvals and statuses of projects.
For more information, read the full Wrike review.
Key features of requirements management tools
When it comes to requirements management tools, there are several features that prospective buyers should be aware of. These features not only streamline the process of managing requirements but also offer unique capabilities that can make a significant difference in project outcomes. Below are some of the key features that were also highlighted in the comparison table.
Requirement traceability
Requirement traceability is crucial for keeping track of each requirement from its inception through its completion. It allows teams to understand the impact of each requirement on the project, making it easier to manage changes and assess risks. In complex or regulated industries, requirement traceability ensures that nothing falls through the cracks and that compliance is maintained.
Version control
Version control is essential for tracking changes and revisions to requirements over time. With this feature, you get a historical record of changes, making it easier to revert to previous versions if needed and to understand the evolution of requirements. And since mistakes or changes can be easily rectified, version control provides a safety net that can save both time and resources.
Workflow automation
Workflow automation is a feature that automates repetitive tasks and processes, thereby increasing efficiency. It allows teams to focus on more complex tasks by automating the simpler, more mundane aspects of requirements management.
Workflow automation is about efficiency and consistency. By automating repetitive tasks, teams can focus on more complex and value-added activities. Aside from being a significant time-saver, it also reduces the likelihood of human error, which is particularly useful in industries where time-to-market is critical.
Customizable dashboards
Customizable dashboards offer more than just personalized tracking; they provide actionable insights. By tailoring the dashboard to show key performance indicators (KPIs) and other essential data, teams can make informed decisions faster. These dashboards enable teams to keep a finger on the pulse of projects, helping to identify issues before they become problems.
Compliance management
Compliance management features help teams adhere to industry standards and regulations and lower the risk of legal repercussions. They are particularly important for projects in regulated industries like healthcare, finance and manufacturing.
How do I choose the best requirements management tool for my business?
Choosing the best requirements management tool for your business is not a one-size-fits-all decision. The tool that’ll work best for you will be dependent on multiple factors, which are unique to your organization’s needs, size and industry. However, there are some rather universal considerations that can help you choose. Aside from your organization’s needs, these include your industry, budget, integration capabilities and scalability.
For instance, regulated sectors may prioritize compliance features, while smaller teams might opt for budget-friendly options like ClickUp. Larger or agile-focused teams may benefit from the scalability of Jira. Finally, prioritize the key features that you need to ensure the tool you choose aligns with your project needs.
Methodology
For this comparison, we first selected a variety of tools that we expected to approach requirement management quite differently. We then compared and examined these tools according to their common features and prices, which augmented our hands-on experience with some tools. This helped us establish what we liked and what had room for improvement for each tool. Verified user reviews also helped us understand what users loved and loathed with each tool.