Discussion Locked

Anna777 Reappearence

0 helpful
9 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Anna777
In recent weeks their has been a post of your points being padded by another member in the Forum,one GI Joe,upon futher investigation it shows that you have received points from this individual to suggest that you are not following the guide lines of the site

Recently there has been a number of questions posted that presented this theory and you would not comment or rebute the suggestions that this was happening,upon futher investigation it is suspect that once the question was posted, you have not particippated in answering questions in the last three weeks.

So what are your feelings on this topic and what defense can you ofer that this is not the case.

9 replies

by timthetoolman

Hi Soulrider,

Yes, its a little disappointing that Anna should feel that she needs to cheat the system to gain more points. Afterall the points are essentially worthless.

My thoughts on them are that as long as I have enough to top out the big5 questions list whenever I feel I need to get a question answered quickly, then I have enough.

I can only assume that Anna wants to be part of the top 5 answerer's list too. Seems a little pointless to me...

I'd like to see Anna back as she has posted many worthwhile answers and has helped many people. In fact I think she got to around 80,000 points "under her own steam".

A worthy answerer in my opionion.

And one who will be missed unless she comes clean.

Cheers,
Tim.

by dmiles

This question was posted as a attention grabber for Anna777,but I have noticed that she does not provide answers that come from myself,to which I have specifically posted questions to get her response because she provided very technical answers.

by timthetoolman

Hi Souldrider,

Thats OK. I just wanted to let her know that we know what she's done and if she can swallow her pride, come back tail between her legs and continue posting here, then we (or at least I) would be happy to have her back.

And so would the people she helps!

Good posting soulrider. I wonder if she's still reading?

Cheers,
Tim.

by dmiles

Hi Tim
I too support her coming back because i feel she is valuable asset to the community,yet I am unsure of her reluctance to answer or post any comments,this does damage her credibility and then what motivates one to cheat when you are offering to share your knowledge to help others.
Hopefully she is still reading,yet by her actions,it seems that her intentions supports her behavior that she is unwilling to step forward to defend herself. I will keep the question open for now and hope that she responds.
But,I doubt she will because she is aware of the consequences of her actions.

by maxwell edison

Hello Soulrider,

I too have noticed Anna777’s reappearance as well as her (I assume her) conspicuous absence in the dialogue with the view all open links questions. I also find it interesting that she’s avoided almost all of my questions for whatever reason. (The only one she’s answered was 73606, and I suppose therein lies the reason it was the last. Interesting indeed.) It’s quite puzzling to me, however, that while she’s obviously attempting to accumulate points by whatever means necessary, she’s avoiding questions of mine which, in the past, has almost been a guarantee of hundreds, perhaps even a thousand or more points to whomever posts an answer – any answer. I also suspect that she’ll avoid this one as well.

In previous discussions about points and their value (or lack thereof), I’ve always maintained that the points are worthless except as a way of saying thanks for someone’s generous giving of their time and knowledge. I still maintain that the “thanks” aspect is a valuable use of the points. However, after considering the impact of my last several questions, I’ve reconsidered that opinion.

The points do indeed have value - a great deal of value - as I have illustrated and taken advantage of. A lot of points given to a question attracts a lot of attention. And if a person has the points to give, a question can be kept at the top of the list for maximum exposure. That is indeed a valuable tool. I suppose it’s like the difference between a $5 tip (or no tip at all) and a $100 tip to the maitre d’ at a fancy restaurant. While being a cheapskate gets you a small table by the kitchen door after a two hour wait, being generous with your tips will get you the best table in the house without having to wait, and you might even get a free bottle of wine in the process. These points are no different.

by maxwell edison

That makes me wonder what she’s going to do with the points. She’s never asked a question, and that’s the only way they can be redeemed. If one doesn’t plan on using them, why spend the time accumulating them?

Something else that is rather perplexing is the fact that some people have posted messages about others being “banished” from the site for misuse of the point system, while others are allowed to do it unencumbered. If TechRepublic punishes one for doing it, they should at least be consistent. They are obviously turning a blind eye to some, while shining the light on others.

Oh well, such is life, to each his own, whatever floats your boat, and all those other quips.

I try not to worry too much about the other guy, especially if it’s concerning something that’s of no real consequence to me. If I do, I run the risk of losing focus of those things that really are important.

Regards,

Maxwell

by maxwell edison

P.S. I agree with Tim that Anna777 has provided some valuable answers to questions, and I'm not at all suggesting that she be "bannished" from the site. On the contrary, I'd like to see her continue to help as she has so obviously done in the past.

In addition, and I'm not sure if everyone realizes this, but if you award points for a question posted, while those points are deducted from your "point bank", that number is not subtracted from the "top scorers list". If that was the case, I would have dropped off the list about 100,000 points ago.

Maxwell

This discussion is closed to new replies.