General discussion

  • Creator
  • #2175619

    Backup Server


    by qmmtq ·

    I look after a network with 2 servers. Both are Dell Poweredge 2850’s. One is running SBS2003 (2 drives RAID 1, 73 GB) looking after mail and print sharing and the other is a DC running W2K3 (6 drives – 2 in RAID 1 34 GB, 43 in RAID 10 136 GB) handling file sharing and backup – using Arcserve v11 and an LTO 100GB tape drive. I am looking to setup a backup server, essentially a server that we can get up and running with a minimum of effort if either of the main servers fail – it may even be a server that we can pick up and take away in an environment type disaster.
    I have a Dell Poweredge 700 with 240GB (RAID 0) of drive space. I am looking for suggestions on how best to set this up to be a backup server – automatic failover would be nice but not essential, data a day old would not be a problem (we do daily tape backups) either. Should I set it up as a DC and then do a daily restore of the data? Can I have a “backup” of the exchange part of SBS so I can restore the daily tapes? Should I look at Brightstor High Availability Server? Can I have 2 servers replicating to one box?

    Any input would be much appreciated.

All Comments

  • Author
    • #3331215

      Wrong forum

      by deepsand ·

      In reply to Backup Server

      This is a tech. problem, in search of a solution.

      It properly belongs in “Technical Q&A,” not in “Discussions.”

      Please re-post there.

      Thank you.

      • #3331206

        My apologies

        by qmmtq ·

        In reply to Wrong forum

        Please accept my apologies – I will repost it in the correct forum

        • #3347244

          It’s a common error.

          by deepsand ·

          In reply to My apologies

          The structure of TR, particularly that button for posting comments to articles, does nothing to guide posters to the correct forum.

          This is a problem that has been addressed in several discussions, with no resolution in sight.
          TR seems to be reluctant to make the site “more complex.”

Viewing 0 reply threads