Discussion Locked

Maximize protection for tape backups

0 helpful
8 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.
Tell us what you think about Mike Talon's advice on how to maximize protection when tape is the primary methodology for DR, as featured in the Oct. 22 Disaster Recovery e-newsletter. How does your organization best protect its tape backups?

8 replies

by gilbert49

In general Mike's strategy sounds ok, but there are no provisions for disaster recovery. When disaster strikes his available backup might be 2 weeks old (according to Murphy's law it will happen when he does his weekly full backup before the former version is sent to the off-site vault). I suggest making a copy of each backup tape in the morning and have it sent to the vault.
And I would like to add a remark on special systems like RAIT or double-drives that stripe data on several drives. Theyare useless when disaster strikes unless your backup provider has identical systems running right now. Don't rely on a contract to have them supplied when necessary, it won't work.

by shafique.awan

I for one would not have any backup at the site. We store all our backups offiste. I think that incase disastor strikes which could make the site inaccessible for instance at least we would have the latest data available offsite.

We use GFS and make full backup every night. The tape stays in the office during working hours to facilitate the recovery of any data that we might need during the day. At closing time we remove the Last back up to a remote location. The tape needed the next day ismade available on site the next morning. This way the maximum backup us offsite. Unfortunately we do not have access to Vaults but I think that this is safe enough. We anticipate and plan for localised disaster. If the whole City is distroyed then Iam not sure if there would be anyone avaibale to restore anything.

by bbevel

Real-time replication and high availability (HA) systems are great. But what if a virus or a glitch corrupts your data. Highly available garbage is still garbage ( worthless ). Its essential to have Tape or some form of offline backup even if you use a real time back up.

by zarina

My work place cannot (won't) afford a better and larger capacity tape drive so I put all the daily and monthly (normal and differential) tapes in the fire-proof safes to be made available at all times.
I wonder how fire proof these safes (by Chubb) are because the tapes would be the first to crinkle if intense heat is outside surrounding it. There's definitely no way for me to test this.

by nbp backup

Check the specs of your fire proof safe then see if you can find any specs on your tapes regarding temperatures and dat retention. I know of an Federal law enforcement office that put their tapes in a fire proof safe and kept it on-site. They had anintense fire and the tapes survived, but the data did not. Data should always be kept off-site. Have you thought about online backups as an alternative? They are very inexpensive, often cheaper than tapes.

by paulh

Replies to today's article on data backup and recovery are correct in stating that off-site storage of backed up data is a must for effective disaster recovery. Second, maintaining an archive of previous versions of data is also a requirement in order to recover from data loss or corruption that may take hours or days to discover. A good resource on this topic is at U.S. Data Trust (usdatatrust.com).

by nbp backup

Mike never discusses online backups. This is a superior method of backing up data, especially for small to medium size companies. No media to buy, rotate, retire or replace. No hardware or software to buy or upgrade. No labor. It always gets backed up, it always goes offsite. Best of all you can actually restore your data and do it without a big hassle. You simply select the file you want, click, enter a password, click and your done. A minute or two (sometime seconds) your file is back where it should be.

This discussion is closed to new replies.